Multi-candidate immunohistochemical markers to assess radiation response and prognosis in prostate cancer: results from the CHHiP trial of radiotherapy fractionation.


Journal

EBioMedicine
ISSN: 2352-3964
Titre abrégé: EBioMedicine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101647039

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 22 08 2022
revised: 20 12 2022
accepted: 25 12 2022
pubmed: 29 1 2023
medline: 15 2 2023
entrez: 28 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Protein markers of cellular proliferation, hypoxia, apoptosis, cell cycle checkpoints, growth factor signalling and inflammation in localised prostate tumours have previously shown prognostic ability. A translational substudy within the CHHiP trial of radiotherapy fractionation evaluated whether these could improve prediction of prognosis and assist treatment stratification following either conventional or hypofractionated radiotherapy. Using case:control methodology, patients with biochemical or clinical failure after radiotherapy (BCR) were matched to patients without recurrence according to established prognostic factors (Gleason score, presenting PSA, tumour-stage) and fractionation schedule. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of diagnostic biopsy sections was performed and scored for HIF1α, Bcl-2, Ki67, Geminin, p16, p53, p-chk1 and PTEN. Univariable and multivariable conditional logistic regression models, adjusted for matching strata and age, estimated the prognostic value of each IHC biomarker, including interaction terms to determine BCR prediction according to fractionation. IHC results were available for up to 336 tumours. PTEN, Geminin, mean Ki67 and max Ki67 were prognostic after adjusting for multiple comparisons and were fitted in a multivariable model (n = 212, 106 matched pairs). Here, PTEN and Geminin showed significant prediction of prognosis. No marker predicted BCR according to fractionation. Geminin or Ki67, and PTEN, predicted response to radiotherapy independently of established prognostic factors. These results provide essential independent external validation of previous findings and confirm a role for these markers in treatment stratification. Cancer Research UK (BIDD) grant (A12518), Cancer Research UK (C8262/A7253), Department of Health, Prostate Cancer UK, Movember Foundation, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Royal Marsden/ICR.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Protein markers of cellular proliferation, hypoxia, apoptosis, cell cycle checkpoints, growth factor signalling and inflammation in localised prostate tumours have previously shown prognostic ability. A translational substudy within the CHHiP trial of radiotherapy fractionation evaluated whether these could improve prediction of prognosis and assist treatment stratification following either conventional or hypofractionated radiotherapy.
METHODS METHODS
Using case:control methodology, patients with biochemical or clinical failure after radiotherapy (BCR) were matched to patients without recurrence according to established prognostic factors (Gleason score, presenting PSA, tumour-stage) and fractionation schedule. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of diagnostic biopsy sections was performed and scored for HIF1α, Bcl-2, Ki67, Geminin, p16, p53, p-chk1 and PTEN. Univariable and multivariable conditional logistic regression models, adjusted for matching strata and age, estimated the prognostic value of each IHC biomarker, including interaction terms to determine BCR prediction according to fractionation.
FINDINGS RESULTS
IHC results were available for up to 336 tumours. PTEN, Geminin, mean Ki67 and max Ki67 were prognostic after adjusting for multiple comparisons and were fitted in a multivariable model (n = 212, 106 matched pairs). Here, PTEN and Geminin showed significant prediction of prognosis. No marker predicted BCR according to fractionation.
INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS
Geminin or Ki67, and PTEN, predicted response to radiotherapy independently of established prognostic factors. These results provide essential independent external validation of previous findings and confirm a role for these markers in treatment stratification.
FUNDING BACKGROUND
Cancer Research UK (BIDD) grant (A12518), Cancer Research UK (C8262/A7253), Department of Health, Prostate Cancer UK, Movember Foundation, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Royal Marsden/ICR.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36708693
pii: S2352-3964(23)00001-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104436
pmc: PMC9900483
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Geminin 0
Ki-67 Antigen 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104436

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 12518
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 7253
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests DD reports personal fees from The Institute of Cancer Research, during the conduct of the study; In addition, DD has a patent EP1933709B1 issued. EH reports grants from Cancer Research UK, during the conduct of the study; grants from Accuray Inc., grants from Varian Medical Systems, grants and non-financial support from Astra Zeneca, grants and non-financial support from Janssen-Cilag, grants and non-financial support from Bayer, grants from Roche Products Ltd, grants and non-financial support from Merck Sharp & Dohm, grants from Prostate Cancer UK, grants and non-financial support from Aventis Pharma Limited (Sanofi), outside the submitted work. AW reports a fellowship from Cancer Research UK during the conduct of the study as well as subsequent funding from AstraZeneca and imCORE. BG, HT, CG, CS, FD, CC and NS have nothing to disclose.

Auteurs

Anna Wilkins (A)

Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom. Electronic address: anna.wilkins@icr.ac.uk.

Barry Gusterson (B)

Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

Holly Tovey (H)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

Clare Griffin (C)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

Christine Stuttle (C)

Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

Frances Daley (F)

Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

Catherine M Corbishley (CM)

Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

David Dearnaley (D)

Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom.

Emma Hall (E)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

Navita Somaiah (N)

Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH