Protocol for the effectiveness evaluation of an antenatal, universally offered, and remotely delivered parenting programme 'Baby Steps' on maternal outcomes: a Born in Bradford's Better Start (BiBBS) study.

Antenatal Baby steps Infant Maternal mental health Maternal-child sensitivity Parenting programme Quasi-experimental Routine data

Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 01 2023
Historique:
received: 11 07 2022
accepted: 20 01 2023
entrez: 28 1 2023
pubmed: 29 1 2023
medline: 1 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Poor perinatal mental health and maternal sensitivity towards a child in the early years can carry a long-term cost to individuals and to society, and result in negative child outcomes such as poor mental health and social emotional issues. Despite the recognition of early intervention and prevention, there is mixed evidence regarding antenatal parenting interventions that aim to enhance perinatal mental health and maternal sensitivity to prevent negative child outcomes. 'Baby Steps' is a relationship-based antenatal and postnatal parenting programme. The service evaluated in this study is delivered in a low-income and ethnically diverse community via Better Start Bradford. This study aims to assess whether the universally, and remotely delivered Baby Steps programme is effective in improving postnatal maternal sensitivity (primary outcome) and postnatal maternal mental health (secondary outcome) when compared to services as usual 6-10 weeks post-birth. It will also assess differences in birth outcomes, and differences in the prevalence of poor perinatal mental ill health through routine data. The feasibility of collecting cost and health related resource use data for a future economic evaluation will be explored. The study is a quasi-experimental evaluation in a single centre. All participants are drawn from Born in Bradford's Better Start (BiBBS) interventional family cohort study. Intervention participants will be matched to a demographically comparable control group using propensity score matching. The required minimum sample is n = 130 (ratio 1:1) to detect a medium effect (± 2.35, d = .50) on the primary outcome-maternal-child sensitivity, using the Mothers Object Relations Scale Short Form (MORS-SF). Secondary outcomes include the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), Generalised Anxiety Disorder assessment 7 (GAD-7), identification of poor perinatal mental health through routine data, and birth outcomes (delivery method, gestation period, low birth weight). Service delivery costs and health resource use will be gathered from routine data. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of Baby Steps for enhancing maternal-child sensitivity and maternal mental health when delivered universally and remotely. The findings regarding programme effectiveness, process, and costs will be relevant for researchers, service commissioners, and service staff. This study was prospectively registered with ISRCTN (22/04/2022, ISRCTN12196131).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Poor perinatal mental health and maternal sensitivity towards a child in the early years can carry a long-term cost to individuals and to society, and result in negative child outcomes such as poor mental health and social emotional issues. Despite the recognition of early intervention and prevention, there is mixed evidence regarding antenatal parenting interventions that aim to enhance perinatal mental health and maternal sensitivity to prevent negative child outcomes. 'Baby Steps' is a relationship-based antenatal and postnatal parenting programme. The service evaluated in this study is delivered in a low-income and ethnically diverse community via Better Start Bradford. This study aims to assess whether the universally, and remotely delivered Baby Steps programme is effective in improving postnatal maternal sensitivity (primary outcome) and postnatal maternal mental health (secondary outcome) when compared to services as usual 6-10 weeks post-birth. It will also assess differences in birth outcomes, and differences in the prevalence of poor perinatal mental ill health through routine data. The feasibility of collecting cost and health related resource use data for a future economic evaluation will be explored.
METHODS
The study is a quasi-experimental evaluation in a single centre. All participants are drawn from Born in Bradford's Better Start (BiBBS) interventional family cohort study. Intervention participants will be matched to a demographically comparable control group using propensity score matching. The required minimum sample is n = 130 (ratio 1:1) to detect a medium effect (± 2.35, d = .50) on the primary outcome-maternal-child sensitivity, using the Mothers Object Relations Scale Short Form (MORS-SF). Secondary outcomes include the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), Generalised Anxiety Disorder assessment 7 (GAD-7), identification of poor perinatal mental health through routine data, and birth outcomes (delivery method, gestation period, low birth weight). Service delivery costs and health resource use will be gathered from routine data.
DISCUSSION
This study will evaluate the effectiveness of Baby Steps for enhancing maternal-child sensitivity and maternal mental health when delivered universally and remotely. The findings regarding programme effectiveness, process, and costs will be relevant for researchers, service commissioners, and service staff.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
This study was prospectively registered with ISRCTN (22/04/2022, ISRCTN12196131).

Identifiants

pubmed: 36709270
doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15111-1
pii: 10.1186/s12889-023-15111-1
pmc: PMC9884130
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

190

Subventions

Organisme : National Lottery Community Fund
ID : 10094849
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Yorkshire and Humber
ID : NIHR200166

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

BMJ. 2002 Sep 21;325(7365):652-4
pubmed: 12242181
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2012 Oct;43(5):683-714
pubmed: 22407278
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Oct 29;5:119
pubmed: 31687175
J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 1;282:1323-1329
pubmed: 33601711
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Jun 1;53(6):1112-1117
pubmed: 29684154
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 21;20(1):93
pubmed: 31964366
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 24;8(10):e022152
pubmed: 30361401
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Oct 30;8:70
pubmed: 18973665
Psychiatry Investig. 2019 Apr;16(4):300-305
pubmed: 31042692
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Mar;20(3):381-6
pubmed: 21351876
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:200-208
pubmed: 33892086
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7
pubmed: 16717171
Prev Sci. 2000 Dec;1(4):213-25
pubmed: 11523749
Acta Paediatr. 2011 Nov;100(11):1495-503
pubmed: 21535134
Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Jul;2(3):109-12
pubmed: 21897887
Psychol Med. 2022 Jul;52(10):1875-1882
pubmed: 33138872
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;34(1):23-36
pubmed: 30341708
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 29;16:270
pubmed: 27473074
Infant Behav Dev. 2008 Jan;31(1):71-80
pubmed: 17714790
Nephrology (Carlton). 2020 Jul;25(7):513-517
pubmed: 32147926
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2019 Sep;22(3):367-387
pubmed: 30796674
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jun 1;156(6):577-578
pubmed: 33825815
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 04;15:711
pubmed: 27488369
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):364-372
pubmed: 30585389
Women Birth. 2021 May;34(3):219-230
pubmed: 32360106
BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 4;19(1):260
pubmed: 30832626
Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):541-6
pubmed: 17448732
Psychol Med. 2020 Jun;50(8):1368-1380
pubmed: 31298180
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 01;8:248
pubmed: 29449816
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 15;16(3):e0248631
pubmed: 33720994
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061
pubmed: 34593508
Prev Sci. 2018 Oct;19(7):880-893
pubmed: 29629506
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;63(1):78-87
pubmed: 34187093
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):978-91
pubmed: 23064411
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):163-73
pubmed: 18752852
Pediatr Res. 2018 Oct;84(4):487-493
pubmed: 29967527
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;60(12):1343-1350
pubmed: 31495929

Auteurs

Kate E Mooney (KE)

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK. kate.mooney@york.ac.uk.
Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK. kate.mooney@york.ac.uk.

Tracey Bywater (T)

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Josie Dickerson (J)

Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.

Gerry Richardson (G)

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.

Bo Hou (B)

Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.

John Wright (J)

Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.

Sarah Blower (S)

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH