Impact of technique on bifurcation stent outcomes in the European Bifurcation Club Left Main Coronary Trial.
bifurcation
coronary occlusion
drug-eluting stent
left main
myocardial infarction
Journal
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
ISSN: 1522-726X
Titre abrégé: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100884139
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2023
02 2023
Historique:
revised:
18
08
2022
received:
08
07
2022
accepted:
15
01
2023
pubmed:
30
1
2023
medline:
3
3
2023
entrez:
29
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Techniques for provisional and dual-stent left main bifurcation stenting require optimization. To identify technical variables influencing procedural outcomes and periprocedural myocardial infarction following left main bifurcation intervention. Procedural and outcome data were analyzed in 438 patients from the per-protocol cohort of the European Bifurcation Club Left Main Trial (EBC MAIN). These patients were randomized to the provisional strategy or a compatible dual-stent extension (T, T-and-protrude, or culotte). Mean age was 71 years and 37.4% presented with an acute coronary syndrome. Transient reduction of side vessel thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow occurred after initial stent placement in 5% of procedures but was not associated with periprocedural myocardial infarction. Failure to rewire a jailed vessel during any strategy was more common when jailed wires were not used (9.5% vs. 2.5%, odds ratio [OR]: 6.4, p = 0.002). In the provisional cohort, the use of the proximal optimization technique was associated with less subsequent side vessel intervention (23.3% vs. 41.9%, OR: 0.4, p = 0.048). Side vessel stenting was predominantly required for dissection, which occurred more often following side vessel preparation (15.3% vs. 4.4%, OR: 3.1, p = 0.040). Exclusive use of noncompliant balloons for kissing balloon inflation was associated with reduced need for side vessel intervention in provisional cases (20.5% vs. 38.5%, OR: 0.4, p = 0.013), and a reduced risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction across all strategies (2.9% vs. 7.7%, OR: 0.2, p = 0.020). When performing provisional or compatible dual-stent left main bifurcation intervention, jailed wire use is associated with successful jailed vessel rewiring. Side vessel preparation in provisional patients is linked to increased side vessel dissection requiring stenting. Use of the proximal optimization technique may reduce the need for additional side vessel intervention, and noncompliant balloon use for kissing balloon inflation is associated with a reduction in both side vessel stenting and periprocedural myocardial infarction. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02497014.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Techniques for provisional and dual-stent left main bifurcation stenting require optimization.
AIM
To identify technical variables influencing procedural outcomes and periprocedural myocardial infarction following left main bifurcation intervention.
METHODS
Procedural and outcome data were analyzed in 438 patients from the per-protocol cohort of the European Bifurcation Club Left Main Trial (EBC MAIN). These patients were randomized to the provisional strategy or a compatible dual-stent extension (T, T-and-protrude, or culotte).
RESULTS
Mean age was 71 years and 37.4% presented with an acute coronary syndrome. Transient reduction of side vessel thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow occurred after initial stent placement in 5% of procedures but was not associated with periprocedural myocardial infarction. Failure to rewire a jailed vessel during any strategy was more common when jailed wires were not used (9.5% vs. 2.5%, odds ratio [OR]: 6.4, p = 0.002). In the provisional cohort, the use of the proximal optimization technique was associated with less subsequent side vessel intervention (23.3% vs. 41.9%, OR: 0.4, p = 0.048). Side vessel stenting was predominantly required for dissection, which occurred more often following side vessel preparation (15.3% vs. 4.4%, OR: 3.1, p = 0.040). Exclusive use of noncompliant balloons for kissing balloon inflation was associated with reduced need for side vessel intervention in provisional cases (20.5% vs. 38.5%, OR: 0.4, p = 0.013), and a reduced risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction across all strategies (2.9% vs. 7.7%, OR: 0.2, p = 0.020).
CONCLUSION
When performing provisional or compatible dual-stent left main bifurcation intervention, jailed wire use is associated with successful jailed vessel rewiring. Side vessel preparation in provisional patients is linked to increased side vessel dissection requiring stenting. Use of the proximal optimization technique may reduce the need for additional side vessel intervention, and noncompliant balloon use for kissing balloon inflation is associated with a reduction in both side vessel stenting and periprocedural myocardial infarction.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02497014.
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02497014']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
553-562Subventions
Organisme : Medtronic Europe
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Hildick-Smith D, Egred M, Banning A, et al. The european bifurcation club left main coronary stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBC MAIN). Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3829-3839.
Hildick-Smith D, Behan MW, Lassen JF, et al. The EBC TWO study (European Bifurcation Coronary TWO): a randomized comparison of provisional T-stenting versus a systematic 2 stent culotte strategy in large caliber true bifurcations. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:e003643.
Albiero R, Burzotta F, Lassen JL, et al. Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions, part I: implanting the first stent in the provisional pathway. The 16th expert consensus document of the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2022;18:e362-e376.
Lassen JL, Albiero R, Johnson TJ, et al. Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions, part II: implanting two stents. The 16th expert consensus document of the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2022;18:457-470.
Murphy JL, Patel N, Vengrenyuk Y, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention on bifurcation lesions with moderate to severe coronary calcium: a single-center registry study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;98:35-42.
Dou K, Zhang D, Xu B, et al. An angiographic tool for risk prediction of side branch occlusion in coronary bifurcation intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:39-46.
Song PS, Song YB, Yang JH, et al. Efecto en los resultados de la intervención y los resultados clínicos a largo plazo de la predilatación de la rama lateral para lesiones coronarias en bifurcación tratadas con la técnica de stent condicional. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2014;67:804-812.
Hahn JY, Chun WJ, Kim JH, et al. Predictors and outcomes of side branch occlusion after main vessel stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1654-1659.
Chevalier B, Mamas MA, Hovasse T, et al. Clinical outcomes of proximal optimization technique (POT) in bifurcation stenting. EuroIntervention. 2021;17:e910-e918.
Park TK, Lee JH, Song YB, et al. Impact of non-compliant balloons on long-term clinical outcomes in coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the COBIS (COronary BIfurcation Stent) II registry. EuroIntervention. 2016;12:456-464.
Moussa ID, Klein LW, Shah B, et al. Consideration of a new definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization. JACC. 2013;62:1563-1570.
Madhavan MV, Tarigopula M, Mintz GS, Maehara A, Stone GW, Généreux P. Coronary artery calcification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1703-1714.
Banning AP, Lassen JF, Burzotta F, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for obstructive bifurcation lesions: the 14th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2019;15:90-98.
Dérimay F, Rioufol G, Nishi T, et al. Optimal balloon positioning for the proximal optimization technique? An experimental bench study. Int J Cardiol. 2019;292:95-97.
Lassen J, Burzotta F, Banning A, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main stem and other bifurcation lesions: 12th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2018;13:1540-1553.