Nurse-to-nurse handoff with distractors and interruptions: An integrative review.


Journal

Nurse education in practice
ISSN: 1873-5223
Titre abrégé: Nurse Educ Pract
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101090848

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 01 11 2022
revised: 10 12 2022
accepted: 19 12 2022
pubmed: 30 1 2023
medline: 25 2 2023
entrez: 29 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

An integrative review of the literature was conducted to explore perceptions of distractors and interruptions during nurse-to-nurse handoff. Handoff distractors and interruptions are recognized as barriers to effective nurse handoff and may lead to preventable and costly medical errors. However, little is known about the perception of these barriers to nurses and strategies to mitigate distractors and interruptions during nurse-to-nurse handoff. Using the framework of Whittemore and Knafl, four electronic databases were searched for articles written in English and published in the last five years. Inclusion criteria included: qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods or quality improvement papers focused on distractors/interruptions during nurse handoff. A multi-author independent review of articles was completed with a rigorous process of data extraction and quality assessment. A total of 17 articles were reviewed with findings categorized into the following themes: perceptions of handoff, characteristics of handoff, or logistics of handoff. Nurses reported that interruptions and distractions were a limitation in handoff quality and handoff efficiency, occurring during inter-shift and unit-to-unit handoff. The two most common types of interruptions and distractions were people (patient, family) and environmental factors (equipment alarms). An organized and standardized approach to handoff was recommended, but few specific examples were reported. Despite recent research related to interruptions and distractions in nurse handoff, few evidence-based strategies have been identified that effectively mitigate these patient safety problems. More evidence is needed to determine best practice methods for handoff training for nurses and nursing students.

Sections du résumé

AIM OBJECTIVE
An integrative review of the literature was conducted to explore perceptions of distractors and interruptions during nurse-to-nurse handoff.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Handoff distractors and interruptions are recognized as barriers to effective nurse handoff and may lead to preventable and costly medical errors. However, little is known about the perception of these barriers to nurses and strategies to mitigate distractors and interruptions during nurse-to-nurse handoff.
METHODS METHODS
Using the framework of Whittemore and Knafl, four electronic databases were searched for articles written in English and published in the last five years. Inclusion criteria included: qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods or quality improvement papers focused on distractors/interruptions during nurse handoff. A multi-author independent review of articles was completed with a rigorous process of data extraction and quality assessment.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 17 articles were reviewed with findings categorized into the following themes: perceptions of handoff, characteristics of handoff, or logistics of handoff. Nurses reported that interruptions and distractions were a limitation in handoff quality and handoff efficiency, occurring during inter-shift and unit-to-unit handoff. The two most common types of interruptions and distractions were people (patient, family) and environmental factors (equipment alarms). An organized and standardized approach to handoff was recommended, but few specific examples were reported.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Despite recent research related to interruptions and distractions in nurse handoff, few evidence-based strategies have been identified that effectively mitigate these patient safety problems. More evidence is needed to determine best practice methods for handoff training for nurses and nursing students.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36709660
pii: S1471-5953(23)00012-4
doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103550
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103550

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest No potential or actual conflicts of interest were declared. This project received no funding.

Auteurs

Kathryn J Vanderzwan (KJ)

Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Illinois Chicago College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: kszige1@uic.edu.

Susan Kilroy (S)

Department of Human Development Nursing Science, University of Illinois Chicago College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA.

Amy Daniels (A)

University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Jennifer O'Rourke (J)

Loyola University, Marcella Niehoff School of Nursing, Maywood, IL, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH