Facilitating animacy perception by manipulating stimuli exposure time.

animacy perception gaze manipulation mere exposure orienting behavior visual attention

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 12 08 2022
accepted: 15 12 2022
entrez: 30 1 2023
pubmed: 31 1 2023
medline: 31 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Animacy perception-discriminating between animate and inanimate visual stimuli-is the basis for engaging in social cognition and for our survival (e.g., avoiding potential danger). Previous studies indicate that factors in a target, such as the features or motion of a target, enhance animacy perception. However, factors in a perceiver, such as the visual attention of a perceiver to a target, have received little attention from researchers. Research on judgment, decision-making, and neuroeconomics indicates the active role of visual attention in constructing decisions. This study examined the role of visual attention in the perception of animacy by manipulating the exposure time of targets. Among Studies 1a to 1c conducted in this study, participants saw two face illustrations alternately; one of the faces was shown to be longer than the other. The participants chose the face that they considered more animated and rounder. Consequently, longer exposure time toward targets facilitated animacy perception and preference rather than the perception of roundness. Furthermore, preregistered Study 2 examined the underlying mechanisms. The results suggest that mere exposure, rather than orienting behavior, might play a vital role in the perception of animacy. Thus, in the reverse relationship between visual attention and animacy perception, animate objects capture attention-attention results in the perception of animacy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36710764
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017685
pmc: PMC9879210
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1017685

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Saito, Motoki, Nouchi and Sugiura.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Vision Res. 2012 May 1;60:16-21
pubmed: 22425778
Percept Mot Skills. 2009 Aug;109(1):79-94
pubmed: 19831089
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Aug;143(4):1476-88
pubmed: 24548281
Cognition. 1995 Aug;56(2):165-93
pubmed: 7554793
Emotion. 2012 Jun;12(3):540-51
pubmed: 22251055
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 16;104(42):16598-603
pubmed: 17909181
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13852-7
pubmed: 21808009
Perception. 2000;29(8):943-51
pubmed: 11145086
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1122-1135
pubmed: 25582810
Percept Psychophys. 2007 May;69(4):591-5
pubmed: 17727112
Perception. 2017 Dec;46(12):1386-1411
pubmed: 28758537
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Jun;118(6):1118-1145
pubmed: 31971441
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Oct;111(4):493-504
pubmed: 27295328
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Jun;21(3):670-5
pubmed: 24197657
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Oct;13(10):1292-8
pubmed: 20835253
Psychol Sci. 2014 Oct;25(10):1943-8
pubmed: 25193944
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Dec;6(12):1317-22
pubmed: 14608360
J Autism Dev Disord. 2006 Nov;36(8):983-92
pubmed: 16897392
Emotion. 2019 Jun;19(4):746-750
pubmed: 30080075
Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):402-8
pubmed: 12930468
Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Aug 25;9:285
pubmed: 28890696
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:6-11
pubmed: 30368108
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Apr;71(3):445-50
pubmed: 19304635
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Sep;144(1):190-206
pubmed: 23845447
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 31;112(13):4170-5
pubmed: 25775604
Psychol Sci. 2010 Dec;21(12):1854-62
pubmed: 21097720
Food Res Int. 2021 Jul;145:110389
pubmed: 34112392
Evol Psychol. 2013 Nov 03;11(5):1011-26
pubmed: 24184882
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 19;371(1686):20150075
pubmed: 26644594
Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;21(11):1724-30
pubmed: 20974713
J Neurosci. 2011 Sep 14;31(37):13214-23
pubmed: 21917804
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Aug;4(8):299-309
pubmed: 10904254
Perception. 1982;11(2):173-86
pubmed: 7155770
Front Neurosci. 2017 Aug 24;11:468
pubmed: 28894413
Neuron. 2016 Jun 15;90(6):1299-1311
pubmed: 27263972
Dev Sci. 2020 Nov;23(6):e12969
pubmed: 32248606
Vision Res. 2006 Oct;46(20):3331-5
pubmed: 16765404
Psychol Bull. 2017 May;143(5):459-498
pubmed: 28263645
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Jun;3(6):625-635
pubmed: 30988476
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Apr;90(4):543-55
pubmed: 16649854
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 11;101(19):7487-91
pubmed: 15123799
Front Psychol. 2012 Jun 13;3:193
pubmed: 22707945
Neuroimage. 2000 Sep;12(3):314-25
pubmed: 10944414

Auteurs

Toshiki Saito (T)

School of Fundamental Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan.

Kosuke Motoki (K)

Department of Management, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Rui Nouchi (R)

Institute for Development and Ageing and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Motoaki Sugiura (M)

Institute for Development and Ageing and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Classifications MeSH