The effect of confounding data features on a deep learning algorithm to predict complete coronary occlusion in a retrospective observational setting.
Artificial intelligence
Deep learning
ECG
STEMI
Journal
European heart journal. Digital health
ISSN: 2634-3916
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Digit Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101778323
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
05
10
2020
revised:
18
12
2020
accepted:
19
01
2021
entrez:
30
1
2023
pubmed:
20
2
2021
medline:
20
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Deep learning (DL) has emerged in recent years as an effective technique in automated ECG analysis. A retrospective, observational study was designed to assess the feasibility of detecting induced coronary artery occlusion in human subjects earlier than experienced cardiologists using a DL algorithm. A deep convolutional neural network was trained using data from the STAFF III database. The task was to classify ECG samples as showing acute coronary artery occlusion, or no occlusion. Occluded samples were recorded after 60 s of balloon occlusion of a single coronary artery. For the first iteration of the experiment, non-occluded samples were taken from ECGs recorded in a restroom prior to entering theatres. For the second iteration of the experiment, non-occluded samples were taken in the theatre prior to balloon inflation. Results were obtained using a cross-validation approach. In the first iteration of the experiment, the DL model achieved an F1 score of 0.814, which was higher than any of three reviewing cardiologists or STEMI criteria. In the second iteration of the experiment, the DL model achieved an F1 score of 0.533, which is akin to the performance of a random chance classifier. The dataset was too small for the second model to achieve meaningful performance, despite the use of transfer learning. However, 'data leakage' during the first iteration of the experiment led to falsely high results. This study highlights the risk of DL models leveraging data leaks to produce spurious results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36711180
doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztab002
pii: ztab002
pmc: PMC9707936
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
127-134Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Références
Eur Heart J. 2000 Feb;21(4):275-83
pubmed: 10653675
Soc Stud Sci. 2018 Feb;48(1):25-56
pubmed: 29160165
BMJ. 1999 Nov 27;319(7222):1426-9
pubmed: 10574869
Nat Med. 2019 Oct;25(10):1467-1468
pubmed: 31551578
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 16;18(12):e323
pubmed: 27986644
Am Heart J. 2000 Feb;139(2 Pt 1):352-8
pubmed: 10650310
J Electrocardiol. 2019 Nov - Dec;57S:S65-S69
pubmed: 31668636
Lancet. 2009 Jul 25;374(9686):273-5
pubmed: 19394076
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Oct;24(5):1521-1536
pubmed: 28936795
N Engl J Med. 2009 May 21;360(21):2165-75
pubmed: 19458363
EuroIntervention. 2013 May 20;9(1):54-61
pubmed: 23685295
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177
pubmed: 28886621
Pediatrics. 2006 Jan;117(1):261-2
pubmed: 16396897
Circulation. 2000 Jun 13;101(23):E215-20
pubmed: 10851218
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):65-69
pubmed: 30617320
Lancet. 2019 Oct 5;394(10205):1225
pubmed: 31537414
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Aug 1;98(3):331-7
pubmed: 16860018
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 May;95(5):1015-1039
pubmed: 32370835
Emerg Med J. 2002 Mar;19(2):129-35
pubmed: 11904259
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):24-29
pubmed: 30617335