Subcortical Functional Connectivity Gradients in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.
Journal
medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences
Titre abrégé: medRxiv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101767986
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Jan 2023
09 Jan 2023
Historique:
entrez:
30
1
2023
pubmed:
31
1
2023
medline:
31
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Functional gradients have been used to study differences in connectivity between healthy and diseased brain states, however this work has largely focused on the cortex. Because the subcortex plays a key role in seizure initiation in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), subcortical functional-connectivity gradients may help further elucidate differences between healthy brains and TLE, as well as differences between left (L)-TLE and right (R)-TLE. In this work, we calculated subcortical functional-connectivity gradients (SFGs) from resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) by measuring the similarity in connectivity profiles of subcortical voxels to cortical gray matter voxels. We performed this analysis in 23 R-TLE patients and 32 L-TLE patients (who were otherwise matched for age, gender, disease specific characteristics, and other clinical variables), and 16 controls. To measure differences in SFGs between L-TLE and R-TLE, we quantified deviations in the average functional gradient distributions, as well as their variance, across subcortical structures. We found an expansion, measured by increased variance, in the principal SFG of TLE relative to controls. When comparing the gradient across subcortical structures between L-TLE and R-TLE, we found that abnormalities in the ipsilateral hippocampal gradient distributions were significantly different between L-TLE and R-TLE. Our results suggest that expansion of the SFG is characteristic of TLE. Subcortical functional gradient differences exist between left and right TLE and are driven by connectivity changes in the hippocampus ipsilateral to the seizure onset zone.
Sections du résumé
Background and Motivation
UNASSIGNED
Functional gradients have been used to study differences in connectivity between healthy and diseased brain states, however this work has largely focused on the cortex. Because the subcortex plays a key role in seizure initiation in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), subcortical functional-connectivity gradients may help further elucidate differences between healthy brains and TLE, as well as differences between left (L)-TLE and right (R)-TLE.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
In this work, we calculated subcortical functional-connectivity gradients (SFGs) from resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) by measuring the similarity in connectivity profiles of subcortical voxels to cortical gray matter voxels. We performed this analysis in 23 R-TLE patients and 32 L-TLE patients (who were otherwise matched for age, gender, disease specific characteristics, and other clinical variables), and 16 controls. To measure differences in SFGs between L-TLE and R-TLE, we quantified deviations in the average functional gradient distributions, as well as their variance, across subcortical structures.
Results
UNASSIGNED
We found an expansion, measured by increased variance, in the principal SFG of TLE relative to controls. When comparing the gradient across subcortical structures between L-TLE and R-TLE, we found that abnormalities in the ipsilateral hippocampal gradient distributions were significantly different between L-TLE and R-TLE.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Our results suggest that expansion of the SFG is characteristic of TLE. Subcortical functional gradient differences exist between left and right TLE and are driven by connectivity changes in the hippocampus ipsilateral to the seizure onset zone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36711498
doi: 10.1101/2023.01.08.23284313
pmc: PMC9882434
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Preprint
Langues
eng
Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateIn
Références
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Nov;23(11):1421-1432
pubmed: 32989295
Commun Biol. 2020 Mar 5;3(1):103
pubmed: 32139786
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2007 Dec;28(6):416-23
pubmed: 18074998
Brain. 2012 Aug;135(Pt 8):2350-7
pubmed: 22669081
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 15;170:83-94
pubmed: 28666880
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Mar;10(3):186-98
pubmed: 19190637
Epilepsy Behav. 2012 Nov;25(3):350-7
pubmed: 23103309
Brain Connect. 2019 Mar;9(2):174-183
pubmed: 30398367
Epilepsia. 2021 Nov;62(11):2589-2603
pubmed: 34490890
Neuroscientist. 2012 Aug;18(4):360-72
pubmed: 22235060
Neuroimage. 2021 Apr 15;230:117831
pubmed: 33549757
Neuroimage Clin. 2015 May 22;8:536-42
pubmed: 26110111
Neurology. 2011 Jan 11;76(2):138-44
pubmed: 21148116
Neuroimage. 2020 Dec;223:117322
pubmed: 32882388
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Oct;34(10):1866-72
pubmed: 22936095
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Jan;36(1):258-87
pubmed: 25181316
Nat Commun. 2021 Apr 13;12(1):2225
pubmed: 33850128
Brain. 2019 Jan 1;143(1):175-190
pubmed: 31860076
Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 15;167:104-120
pubmed: 29155184
Schizophr Bull. 2020 Mar 07;:
pubmed: 32144421
Epilepsia. 2021 Dec;62(12):2941-2954
pubmed: 34642939
Neuroimage. 2019 Jul 1;194:272-282
pubmed: 30894331
Neuroscientist. 2006 Dec;12(6):512-23
pubmed: 17079517
Hippocampus. 2009 Jun;19(6):517-25
pubmed: 19437496
Epilepsy Res. 2014 Dec;108(10):1770-81
pubmed: 25445238
Nat Methods. 2019 Jan;16(1):111-116
pubmed: 30532080
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Sep;55:76-81
pubmed: 29958756
Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 4;10(1):1022
pubmed: 30833582
Neuroimage. 2020 Sep;218:116960
pubmed: 32454205
Commun Biol. 2019 Oct 10;2:370
pubmed: 31633061
Neuroimage. 1999 Feb;9(2):179-94
pubmed: 9931268
Epilepsia. 2020 Jun;61(6):1221-1233
pubmed: 32452574
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 1;113(44):12574-12579
pubmed: 27791099
Front Neurosci. 2014 Dec 11;8:411
pubmed: 25565942
Neuroimage. 2022 May 1;251:118987
pubmed: 35151850
Brain Res. 2010 Apr 6;1323:152-60
pubmed: 20132802
Epilepsy Res. 1993 Jul;15(3):247-52
pubmed: 8223421
Neuroimage. 2006 Sep;32(3):1070-9
pubmed: 16872843
Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Aug 01;5:349-58
pubmed: 26236626
J Neurosurg. 2013 Aug;119(2):288-300
pubmed: 23706058
Brain. 2022 May 02;:
pubmed: 35511160
Seizure. 2017 Jan;44:37-41
pubmed: 28017580
N Engl J Med. 2000 Feb 3;342(5):314-9
pubmed: 10660394