Assessing the methodology used to study the ascending aorta haemodynamics in bicuspid aortic valve.

Computational fluid dynamics  Aortic valve

Journal

European heart journal. Digital health
ISSN: 2634-3916
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Digit Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101778323

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 27 11 2020
revised: 30 01 2021
entrez: 30 1 2023
pubmed: 11 6 2021
medline: 11 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Modern imaging techniques provide evermore-detailed anatomical and physiological information for use in computational fluid dynamics to predict the behaviour of physiological phenomena. Computer modelling can help plan suitable interventions. Our group used magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics to study the haemodynamic variables in the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valve before and after isolated tissue aortic valve replacement. Computer modelling requires turning a physiological model into a mathematical one, solvable by equations that undergo multiple iterations in four dimensions. Creating these models involves several steps with manual inputs, making the process prone to errors and limiting its inter- and intra-operator reproducibility. Despite these challenges, we created computational models for each patient to study ascending aorta blood flow before and after surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging provided the anatomical and velocity data required for the blood flow simulation. Patient-specific in- and outflow boundary conditions were used for the computational fluid dynamics analysis. Haemodynamic variables pertaining to blood flow pattern and derived from the magnetic resonance imaging data were calculated. However, we encountered problems in our multi-step methodology, most notably processing the flow data. This meant that other variables requiring computation with computational fluid dynamics could not be calculated. Creating a model for computational fluid dynamics analysis is as complex as the physiology under scrutiny. We discuss some of the difficulties associated with creating such models, along with suggestions for improvements in order to yield reliable and beneficial results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36712393
doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztab022
pii: ztab022
pmc: PMC9707862
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

271-278

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Références

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Jan;47(1):246-254
pubmed: 28390180
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Aug;156(2):e41-e74
pubmed: 30011777
Radiology. 2010 Apr;255(1):53-61
pubmed: 20308444
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 15;370(20):1920-9
pubmed: 24827036
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Dec;40(6):1342-6
pubmed: 24265266
Physiol Rev. 2009 Jul;89(3):957-89
pubmed: 19584318
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jan;153(1):8-20.e3
pubmed: 27847162
Dev Dyn. 2008 Oct;237(10):2804-19
pubmed: 18816864
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Nov;34(5):1226-30
pubmed: 21928387
Circulation. 2014 Feb 11;129(6):673-82
pubmed: 24345403
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jul;36(1):128-38
pubmed: 22336966
JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Apr 29;5:2048004016645467
pubmed: 27170842
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Sep 26;15(146):
pubmed: 30257924
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Sep 07;18(1):55
pubmed: 27599727
Radiographics. 2002 May-Jun;22(3):651-71
pubmed: 12006694
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 13;10(1):13724
pubmed: 32792540
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Aug 25;66(8):892-900
pubmed: 26293758
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jun;43(6):e180-6
pubmed: 23248206
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2009;11:109-34
pubmed: 19400706
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 6;55(14):e27-e129
pubmed: 20359588
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1992 Mar-Apr;2(2):143-53
pubmed: 1562765
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Apr;45(4):e118-24; discussion e124
pubmed: 24420369
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jul;4(7):781-7
pubmed: 21757170
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:806261
pubmed: 22645456
Acad Radiol. 2015 Jun;22(6):690-6
pubmed: 25769698
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2016 Nov;31(6):585-592
pubmed: 27583373
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Aug;17(8):877-84
pubmed: 26377908
Kardiol Pol. 2014;72(12):1169-252
pubmed: 25524604
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jul;6(4):499-507
pubmed: 23771987
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2005 Oct;8(5):295-305
pubmed: 16298851
JAMA. 1999 Dec 1;282(21):2035-42
pubmed: 10591386
J Biomech. 2017 Jan 4;50:63-70
pubmed: 27855987
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008 Dec;5(12):821-8
pubmed: 18941438
J Heart Valve Dis. 2006 Jan;15(1):20-7; discussion 27
pubmed: 16480008
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jun;153(6):1263-1272.e1
pubmed: 28268004
J Biomech Eng. 2015 Apr;137(4):041005
pubmed: 25588057

Auteurs

Joy Edlin (J)

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St George's Hospital, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, UK.

Justin Nowell (J)

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St George's Hospital, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, UK.

Christopher Arthurs (C)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.

Alberto Figueroa (A)

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Marjan Jahangiri (M)

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St George's Hospital, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, UK.

Classifications MeSH