Racial and ethnic disparities in Medicare Part D medication therapy management services utilization.
Comprehensive medication review
Medicare Part D Medication Therapy Management
Pharmacist
Racial and ethnic disparities
Service utilization
Targeted medication review
Journal
Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy
ISSN: 2667-2766
Titre abrégé: Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918266300706676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
13
06
2022
revised:
05
11
2022
accepted:
06
01
2023
entrez:
30
1
2023
pubmed:
31
1
2023
medline:
31
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Medicare Part D medication therapy management (MTM) program has positive effects on medication and health service utilization. However, little is known about its utilization, much less so about the use among racial and ethnic minorities. To examine MTM service utilization among older Medicare beneficiaries and to identify any racial and ethnic disparity patterns. A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 2017 Medicare administrative data, linked to the Area Health Resources Files. Fourteen outcomes related to MTM service nature, initiation, quantity, and delivery were examined using logistic, negative binomial, and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Racial and ethnic disparities were found with varying patterns across outcomes. For example, compared with White patients, the odds of opting out of MTM were 8% higher for Black patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.14), 57% higher for Hispanic patients (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.42-1.72), and 57% higher for Asian patients (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.33-1.85). The odds of continuing MTM from the previous years were 12% lower for Black patients (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.86-0.90) and 3% lower for other patients (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95-0.99). In addition, the probability of being offered a comprehensive medication review (CMR) after MTM enrollment was 9% lower for Hispanic patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.85-0.97), 9% lower for Asian patients (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.87-0.94), and 3% lower for other patients (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95-0.99). Hispanic and Asian patients were more likely to have someone other than themselves receive a CMR. Racial and ethnic disparities in MTM service utilization were identified. Although the disparities in specific utilization outcomes vary across racial/ethnic groups, it is evident that these disparities exist and may result in vulnerable communities not fully benefiting from the MTM services. Causes of the disparities should be explored to inform future reform of the Medicare Part D MTM program.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The Medicare Part D medication therapy management (MTM) program has positive effects on medication and health service utilization. However, little is known about its utilization, much less so about the use among racial and ethnic minorities.
Objective
UNASSIGNED
To examine MTM service utilization among older Medicare beneficiaries and to identify any racial and ethnic disparity patterns.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 2017 Medicare administrative data, linked to the Area Health Resources Files. Fourteen outcomes related to MTM service nature, initiation, quantity, and delivery were examined using logistic, negative binomial, and Cox proportional hazards regression models.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Racial and ethnic disparities were found with varying patterns across outcomes. For example, compared with White patients, the odds of opting out of MTM were 8% higher for Black patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.14), 57% higher for Hispanic patients (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.42-1.72), and 57% higher for Asian patients (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.33-1.85). The odds of continuing MTM from the previous years were 12% lower for Black patients (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.86-0.90) and 3% lower for other patients (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95-0.99). In addition, the probability of being offered a comprehensive medication review (CMR) after MTM enrollment was 9% lower for Hispanic patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.85-0.97), 9% lower for Asian patients (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.87-0.94), and 3% lower for other patients (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95-0.99). Hispanic and Asian patients were more likely to have someone other than themselves receive a CMR.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Racial and ethnic disparities in MTM service utilization were identified. Although the disparities in specific utilization outcomes vary across racial/ethnic groups, it is evident that these disparities exist and may result in vulnerable communities not fully benefiting from the MTM services. Causes of the disparities should be explored to inform future reform of the Medicare Part D MTM program.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36712831
doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100222
pii: S2667-2766(23)00003-3
pmc: PMC9874058
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100222Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG040146
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Xiaobei Dong: None. Chi Chun Steve Tsang: None. Jamie A. Browning: None. Joseph Garuccio: None. Jim Y. Wan: None. Ya Chen Tina Shih: None. Marie A. Chisholm-Burns: Received funding from Carlos and Marguerite Mason Trust. Samuel Dagogo-Jack: Led clinical trials for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novo Nordisk, Inc., received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Merck & Co. Inc., and Sanofi, and has equity interests in Jana Care, Inc. and Aerami Therapeutics. William C. Cushman: Received grant funding from Eli Lilly. Junling Wang: Received funding from AbbVie, Curo, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), and serves on Heath Outcomes Research Advisor Committee of the PhRMA Foundation.
Références
Fed Regist. 2014 May 23;79(100):29843-968
pubmed: 24855709
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Sep;37(9):1581-1588
pubmed: 34039232
Health Serv Res. 2000 Feb;34(6):1273-302
pubmed: 10654830
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Sep;16(9):1208-1214
pubmed: 31859225
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 7;22(1):159
pubmed: 35130899
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 May - Jun;60(3):456-461
pubmed: 31926872
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 Jul;65(4):492-501
pubmed: 20034992
J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2019 Aug;2(4):373-382
pubmed: 31460497
Health Serv Res. 2008 Apr;43(2):552-68
pubmed: 18370967
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Sep;52(9):829-837
pubmed: 29577766
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2008 Sep-Oct;48(5):648-53
pubmed: 18826904
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Jul - Aug;60(4):571-579.e1
pubmed: 31953120
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2012;52(6):e144-52
pubmed: 23229976
Med Care. 2016 Aug;54(8):765-71
pubmed: 27116106
Med Care. 2020 Jan;58(1):e1-e8
pubmed: 31688554
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jan;175(1):76-87
pubmed: 25401788
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 May;40(5):802-811
pubmed: 33939507
Gerontologist. 2009 Dec;49(6):828-38
pubmed: 19531806
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Sep;24(9):904-910
pubmed: 30156456
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Nov;22 Suppl 2:289-93
pubmed: 17957413
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Dec;20(12):1162-82
pubmed: 25443511
Prim Care. 2005 Sep;32(3):755-75
pubmed: 16140126
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Nov;17(11):1863-1876
pubmed: 33766505
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Sep;27(16 Suppl):S292-S299
pubmed: 34529368
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2008 May-Jun;48(3):341-53
pubmed: 18595820
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jan;23(1):13-21
pubmed: 28025924
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jun;25(6):688-695
pubmed: 31134865
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2021 Sep;14(3):101-109
pubmed: 35261713