From population- to patient-based prediction of in-hospital mortality in heart failure using machine learning.

artificial intelligence heart failure in-hospital mortality prediction machine learning

Journal

European heart journal. Digital health
ISSN: 2634-3916
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Digit Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101778323

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 31 01 2022
revised: 18 03 2022
accepted: 30 03 2022
entrez: 30 1 2023
pubmed: 31 1 2023
medline: 31 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Utilizing administrative data may facilitate risk prediction in heart failure inpatients. In this short report, we present different machine learning models that predict in-hospital mortality on an individual basis utilizing this widely available data source. Inpatient cases with a main discharge diagnosis of heart failure hospitalized between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2018 in one of 86 German Helios hospitals were examined. Comorbidities were defined by ICD-10 codes from administrative data. The data set was randomly split into 75/25% portions for model development and testing. Five algorithms were evaluated: logistic regression [generalized linear models (GLMs)], random forest (RF), gradient boosting machine (GBM), single-layer neural network (NNET), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). After model tuning, the receiver operating characteristics area under the curves (ROC AUCs) were calculated and compared with DeLong's test. A total of 59 074 inpatient cases (mean age 77.6 ± 11.1 years, 51.9% female, 89.4% NYHA Class III/IV) were included and in-hospital mortality was 6.2%. In the test data set, calculated ROC AUCs were 0.853 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.842-0.863] for GLM, 0.851 (95% CI 0.840-0.862) for RF, 0.855 (95% CI 0.844-0.865) for GBM, 0.836 (95% CI 0.823-0.849) for NNET, and 0.856 (95% CI 9.846-0.867) for XGBoost. XGBoost outperformed all models except GBM. Machine learning-based processing of administrative data enables the creation of well-performing prediction models for in-hospital mortality in heart failure patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36713020
doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac012
pii: ztac012
pmc: PMC9708014
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

307-310

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.

Références

PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0224135
pubmed: 31940350
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 30;15(11):e1002709
pubmed: 30500816
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 8;7(4):
pubmed: 29437604
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Dec;22(12):2190-2201
pubmed: 33135851
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Aug;8(4):3026-3036
pubmed: 34085775
Europace. 2020 Nov 1;22(11):1635-1644
pubmed: 32879969
J Card Fail. 2019 Jul;25(7):571-575
pubmed: 30822512
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Oct;2(5):440-6
pubmed: 25194291
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 22;12(14):1304-1311
pubmed: 31255564
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918962
pubmed: 31922560

Auteurs

Sebastian König (S)

Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Department of Electrophysiology, Strümpellstraße 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.

Vincent Pellissier (V)

Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.

Sven Hohenstein (S)

Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.

Johannes Leiner (J)

Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.

Andreas Meier-Hellmann (A)

Helios Hospitals, Berlin, Germany.

Ralf Kuhlen (R)

Helios Health, Berlin, Germany.

Gerhard Hindricks (G)

Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Department of Electrophysiology, Strümpellstraße 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.

Andreas Bollmann (A)

Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Department of Electrophysiology, Strümpellstraße 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.

Classifications MeSH