A comparison of temporal pathways to self-harm in young people compared to adults: A pilot test of the Card Sort Task for Self-harm online using Indicator Wave Analysis.

CaTS-online Indicator Wave Analysis adolescence adulthood card sort co-development digital interventions self-harm

Journal

Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 21 06 2022
accepted: 12 12 2022
entrez: 30 1 2023
pubmed: 31 1 2023
medline: 31 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Self-harm is complex, multifaceted, and dynamic, typically starts in adolescence, and is prevalent in young people. A novel research tool (the Card Sort Task for Self-harm; CaTS) offers a systematic approach to understanding this complexity by charting the dynamic interplay between multidimensional factors in the build-up to self-harm. Sequential analysis of CaTS has revealed differences in key factors between the first and the most recent episode of self-harm in adolescence. Rates of self-harm typically decline post-adolescence, but self-harm can continue into adulthood. A comparison between factors linked to self-harm in young people vs. adults will inform an understanding of how risk unfolds over time and clarify age-specific points for intervention. A pilot online adaptation (CaTS-online) and a new method (Indicator Wave Analysis; IWA) were used to assess key factors in the build-up to self-harm. Community-based young people ( Positive emotion at and immediately after self-harm exceeded the threshold for both groups for both episodes. Feeling better following self-harm was more pronounced for the first-ever episodes. Impulsivity was an important immediate antecedent to self-harm for both groups at both episodes but most markedly for young people. Acquired capability was notable for adults' most recent episodes, suggesting this develops over time. Burdensomeness was only more notable for adults and occurred 1 week prior to a recent episode. Both groups revealed patterns of accessing support that were helpful and unhelpful. Commonalities and differences in the temporal organisation of factors leading to and following self-harm were identified in young people and adult pathways which shed light on age-specific factors and possible points of intervention. This has implications for clinical support and services around approaches to positive feelings after self-harm (especially for first-ever self-harm), feeling of burdensomeness, impulsivity, and acquired capability leading up to self-harm. Support is provided for card-sort approaches that enable the investigation of the complex and dynamic nature of pathways to self-harm.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Self-harm is complex, multifaceted, and dynamic, typically starts in adolescence, and is prevalent in young people. A novel research tool (the Card Sort Task for Self-harm; CaTS) offers a systematic approach to understanding this complexity by charting the dynamic interplay between multidimensional factors in the build-up to self-harm. Sequential analysis of CaTS has revealed differences in key factors between the first and the most recent episode of self-harm in adolescence. Rates of self-harm typically decline post-adolescence, but self-harm can continue into adulthood. A comparison between factors linked to self-harm in young people vs. adults will inform an understanding of how risk unfolds over time and clarify age-specific points for intervention. A pilot online adaptation (CaTS-online) and a new method (Indicator Wave Analysis; IWA) were used to assess key factors in the build-up to self-harm.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Community-based young people (
Results UNASSIGNED
Positive emotion at and immediately after self-harm exceeded the threshold for both groups for both episodes. Feeling better following self-harm was more pronounced for the first-ever episodes. Impulsivity was an important immediate antecedent to self-harm for both groups at both episodes but most markedly for young people. Acquired capability was notable for adults' most recent episodes, suggesting this develops over time. Burdensomeness was only more notable for adults and occurred 1 week prior to a recent episode. Both groups revealed patterns of accessing support that were helpful and unhelpful.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Commonalities and differences in the temporal organisation of factors leading to and following self-harm were identified in young people and adult pathways which shed light on age-specific factors and possible points of intervention. This has implications for clinical support and services around approaches to positive feelings after self-harm (especially for first-ever self-harm), feeling of burdensomeness, impulsivity, and acquired capability leading up to self-harm. Support is provided for card-sort approaches that enable the investigation of the complex and dynamic nature of pathways to self-harm.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36713895
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.938003
pmc: PMC9878399
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

938003

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/W002450/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Lockwood, Babbage, Bird, Thynne, Barsky, Clarke and Townsend.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 21;15(12):e0244319
pubmed: 33347492
J Affect Disord. 2014 Oct;168:407-14
pubmed: 25108277
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Jun 19;12:52-61
pubmed: 31388663
Lancet. 2012 Jun 23;379(9834):2373-82
pubmed: 22726518
Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;200(4):330-5
pubmed: 22403089
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Dec;42:156-67
pubmed: 26416295
Pers Individ Dif. 2016 Feb 1;90:332-337
pubmed: 26949280
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;46(4):508-514
pubmed: 17420686
Lancet. 2012 Jan 21;379(9812):236-43
pubmed: 22100201
Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;214(4):186-200
pubmed: 30789112
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;61(8):928-940
pubmed: 32572961
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;42(7):513-21
pubmed: 17516016
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;5(2):167-174
pubmed: 29246453
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 May;7(5):381-383
pubmed: 32353264
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2018 May 02;12:23
pubmed: 29743942
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Jan;55(1):125-128
pubmed: 31667559
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Feb;4(2):111-120
pubmed: 31926769
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Jul;6(7):964-974
pubmed: 35484208
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 08;8:1946
pubmed: 29167651
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;60(12):1491-1500
pubmed: 34130904
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2015 Jan 30;2:2
pubmed: 26401305
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 15;13(11):e0206584
pubmed: 30439958
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Jun;38:13-24
pubmed: 25779460
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 5;373(1754):
pubmed: 30012735
J Affect Disord. 2016 Dec;206:161-168
pubmed: 27475886
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2022 Nov;27(4):352-360
pubmed: 35042280
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;26(4):387-402
pubmed: 27815757
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Nov 19;8(11):e30915
pubmed: 34807835
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;57(10):733-741
pubmed: 30274648
BMJ. 2017 Oct 18;359:j4351
pubmed: 29046278
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;6(7):573-581
pubmed: 31175059
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 22;4:CD013668
pubmed: 33884617
Br J Clin Psychol. 2017 Nov;56(4):388-407
pubmed: 28593633
Cogn Emot. 2017 Dec;31(8):1543-1556
pubmed: 27702245
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:339-63
pubmed: 20192787
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Apr 30;166(2-3):260-8
pubmed: 19275962
Psychol Bull. 2017 Feb;143(2):187-232
pubmed: 27841450
Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;186:538-9
pubmed: 15928367
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;30(3):475-492
pubmed: 32318877
J Affect Disord. 2013 Mar 5;145(3):356-62
pubmed: 23021191
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 12;(5):CD012189
pubmed: 27168519
J Health Psychol. 2017 Nov;22(13):1631-1641
pubmed: 26951365
Crisis. 2005;26(2):64-72
pubmed: 16138742
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jun;215:37-48
pubmed: 28315579
Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):579-88
pubmed: 22035987
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Mar;2(3):223-228
pubmed: 30169257
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 15;16(6):e0253278
pubmed: 34129610
J Affect Disord. 2013 Dec;151(3):821-30
pubmed: 24091302
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;44(8):601-7
pubmed: 19023507

Auteurs

Joanna Lockwood (J)

National Institute of Health Research MindTech MedTech Co-operative, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Camilla Babbage (C)

National Institute of Health Research MindTech MedTech Co-operative, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Katherine Bird (K)

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Imogen Thynne (I)

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Andrey Barsky (A)

School of Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

David D Clarke (DD)

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Ellen Townsend (E)

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH