The influence of a probiotic/prebiotic supplement on microbial and metabolic parameters of equine cecal fluid or fecal slurry in vitro.


Journal

Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Jan 2023
Historique:
received: 05 12 2022
accepted: 27 01 2023
pmc-release: 28 01 2024
pubmed: 31 1 2023
medline: 11 3 2023
entrez: 30 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The microbes that reside within the equine hindgut create a complex and dynamic ecosystem. The equine hindgut microbiota is intimately associated with health and, as such, represents an area which can be beneficially modified. Synbiotics, supplements that combine probiotic micro-organisms with prebiotic ingredients, are a potential means of influencing the hindgut microbiota to promote health and prevent disease. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the influence of an equine probiotic/prebiotic supplement on characteristics of the microbiota and metabolite production in vitro. Equine cecal fluid and fecal material were collected from an abattoir in QC, CAN. Five hundred milliliters of cecal fluid was used to inoculate chemostat vessels maintained as batch fermenters (chemostat cecal, N = 11) with either 0 g (control) or 0.44 g of supplement added at 12 h intervals. One hundred milliliters of cecal fluid (anaerobic cecal, N = 15) or 5% fecal slurry (anaerobic fecal, N = 6) were maintained in an anaerobic chamber with either 0 g (control) or 0.356 g of supplement added at the time of vessel establishment. Samples were taken from vessels at vessel establishment (0), 24, or 48 h of incubation. Illumina sequencing of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and bioinformatics were performed for microbiome analysis. Metabolite data was obtained via NMR spectroscopy. All statistical analyses were run in SAS 9.4. There was no effect of treatment at 24 or 48h on alpha or beta diversity indices and limited taxonomic differences were noted. Acetate, propionate, and butyrate were higher in treated compared to untreated vessels in all methods. A consistent effect of supplementation on the metabolic profile with no discernable impact on the microbiota of these in vitro systems indicates inoculum microbe viability and a utilization of the provided fermentable substrate within the systems. Although no changes within the microbiome were apparent, the consistent changes in metabolites indicates a potential prebiotic effect of the added supplement and merits further exploration. This research investigated the impact of an equine prebiotic/probiotic supplement on the equine cecal microbiota by utilizing an in vitro fermentation system. By using two types of fermentation systems and inocula obtained using a fecal slurry and cecal contents, we evaluated how the addition of the supplement changed the microbial function over the 48 h experimental period. Although the supplement did drastically influence the production of volatile fatty acids produced by the microbes in all systems, the microbial composition did not change. Thus, indicating the supplement did not, in this in vitro context, provide probiotic or prebiotic potential. However, the systems remained viable and the microbes actively metabolized substrate for the duration of the experiment.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
This research investigated the impact of an equine prebiotic/probiotic supplement on the equine cecal microbiota by utilizing an in vitro fermentation system. By using two types of fermentation systems and inocula obtained using a fecal slurry and cecal contents, we evaluated how the addition of the supplement changed the microbial function over the 48 h experimental period. Although the supplement did drastically influence the production of volatile fatty acids produced by the microbes in all systems, the microbial composition did not change. Thus, indicating the supplement did not, in this in vitro context, provide probiotic or prebiotic potential. However, the systems remained viable and the microbes actively metabolized substrate for the duration of the experiment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36715114
pii: 7008793
doi: 10.1093/jas/skad034
pmc: PMC9994591
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Prebiotics 0
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Selected BioProducts INC

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Références

Equine Vet J. 2015 Nov;47(6):641-9
pubmed: 25257320
Animal. 2017 Jul;11(7):1136-1145
pubmed: 28065211
Microorganisms. 2020 Dec 21;8(12):
pubmed: 33371530
J Food Sci Technol. 2015 Dec;52(12):7577-87
pubmed: 26604335
Br J Nutr. 1998 Oct;80(4):S197-202
pubmed: 9924284
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(2):333-344
pubmed: 30267869
J Equine Sci. 2014;25(4):65-72
pubmed: 25558179
Altern Med Rev. 2008 Dec;13(4):315-29
pubmed: 19152479
Can Vet J. 2003 Apr;44(4):299-302
pubmed: 12715981
Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Feb;73(2 Suppl):361S-364S
pubmed: 11157342
Br J Nutr. 2020 Feb 28;123(4):372-382
pubmed: 31690358
J Vet Intern Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;28(6):1640-52
pubmed: 25231539
J Exp Med. 1935 Feb 28;61(3):335-49
pubmed: 19870362
Endocrinol Nutr. 2016 Nov;63(9):482-494
pubmed: 27633133
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jun 17;10(6):
pubmed: 32560296
Arch Oral Biol. 1981;26(12):963-9
pubmed: 6122435
Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2019;20(2):145-154
pubmed: 29756574
Animals (Basel). 2020 Aug 12;10(8):
pubmed: 32806591
ISME J. 2008 Nov;2(11):1089-100
pubmed: 18580970
Equine Vet J. 2016 Nov;48(6):689-696
pubmed: 26509834
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016 May;22(5):1137-50
pubmed: 27070911
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):e0166523
pubmed: 27846295
Biochem J. 2017 May 16;474(11):1823-1836
pubmed: 28512250
Nat Med. 2016 Oct 06;22(10):1079-1089
pubmed: 27711063
Animals (Basel). 2022 Aug 08;12(15):
pubmed: 35953998
J Nutr. 1995 Jun;125(6):1401-12
pubmed: 7782892
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2020 Dec;412(30):8241-8247
pubmed: 33033893
mSystems. 2016 May 3;1(3):
pubmed: 27822526
Vet Microbiol. 2002 Jun 5;87(1):81-8
pubmed: 12079749
Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2016;7:167-90
pubmed: 26735801
Vet J. 2015 Jul;205(1):74-80
pubmed: 25975855
Benef Microbes. 2020 Mar 27;11(2):101-129
pubmed: 32073295
J Microbiol Methods. 2015 Jun;113:16-26
pubmed: 25819008
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Aug;14(8):491-502
pubmed: 28611480
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41484
pubmed: 22859989
J Nutr. 2004 Jun;134(6):1523-8
pubmed: 15173423
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 May;12(5):303-10
pubmed: 25824997
J Biotechnol. 2000 Dec 28;84(3):197-215
pubmed: 11164262
Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2010 Apr;26(1):79-94
pubmed: 20381737
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Mar 28;17(12):1519-28
pubmed: 21472114
Cell Host Microbe. 2018 Jun 13;23(6):705-715
pubmed: 29902436
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jan 15;185(2):115-123
pubmed: 27986704
Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2018 Apr;34(1):13-24
pubmed: 29402478
Front Microbiol. 2021 Mar 25;12:646294
pubmed: 33841371
J Equine Vet Sci. 2020 May;88:102943
pubmed: 32303307

Auteurs

Jennifer L MacNicol (JL)

Department of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada.

Simone Renwick (S)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Biological Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada.

Caroline M Ganobis (CM)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Biological Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada.

Emma Allen-Vercoe (E)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Biological Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada.

Jeffery S Weese (JS)

Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada.

Wendy Pearson (W)

Department of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH