Developing an Evidence-Based Surgical Curriculum: Learning from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Rehearsal in Virtual Reality.
Journal
The journal of international advanced otology
ISSN: 2148-3817
Titre abrégé: J Int Adv Otol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101522982
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
entrez:
31
1
2023
pubmed:
1
2
2023
medline:
2
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Surgical rehearsal - patient-specific preoperative surgical practice - can be provided by virtual reality simulation. This study investigated the effect of surgical rehearsal on cortical mastoidectomy performance and procedure duration. University students (n=40) were randomized evenly into a rehearsal and control group. After watching a video tutorial on cortical mastoidectomy, participants completed the procedure on a virtual reality simulator as a pre-test. Participants completed a further 8 cortical mastoidectomies on the virtual reality simulator as training before drilling two 3-dimensional (3D) printed temporal bones. The rehearsal group received 3D printed bones they had previously operated on in virtual reality, while the control group received 2 new bones. Cortical mastoidectomy was assessed by 3 blinded graders using the Melbourne Mastoidectomy Scale. There was high interrater reliability between the 3 graders (intraclass correlation coefficient, r=0.8533, P < .0001). There was no difference in the mean surgical performance on the two 3D printed bones between the control and rehearsal groups (P=.2791). There was no significant difference in the mean procedure duration between the control and rehearsal groups for both 3D printed bones (P=.8709). However, there was a significant decrease in procedure duration between the first and second 3D printed bones (P < .0001). In this study, patient-specific virtual reality rehearsal provided no additional advantage to cortical mastoidectomy performance by novice operators compared to generic practice on a virtual reality simulator. Further, virtual reality training did not improve cortical mastoidectomy performance on 3D printed bones, highlighting the impact of anatomical diversity and changing operating modalities on the acquisition of new surgical skills.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Surgical rehearsal - patient-specific preoperative surgical practice - can be provided by virtual reality simulation. This study investigated the effect of surgical rehearsal on cortical mastoidectomy performance and procedure duration.
METHODS
METHODS
University students (n=40) were randomized evenly into a rehearsal and control group. After watching a video tutorial on cortical mastoidectomy, participants completed the procedure on a virtual reality simulator as a pre-test. Participants completed a further 8 cortical mastoidectomies on the virtual reality simulator as training before drilling two 3-dimensional (3D) printed temporal bones. The rehearsal group received 3D printed bones they had previously operated on in virtual reality, while the control group received 2 new bones. Cortical mastoidectomy was assessed by 3 blinded graders using the Melbourne Mastoidectomy Scale.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There was high interrater reliability between the 3 graders (intraclass correlation coefficient, r=0.8533, P < .0001). There was no difference in the mean surgical performance on the two 3D printed bones between the control and rehearsal groups (P=.2791). There was no significant difference in the mean procedure duration between the control and rehearsal groups for both 3D printed bones (P=.8709). However, there was a significant decrease in procedure duration between the first and second 3D printed bones (P < .0001).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, patient-specific virtual reality rehearsal provided no additional advantage to cortical mastoidectomy performance by novice operators compared to generic practice on a virtual reality simulator. Further, virtual reality training did not improve cortical mastoidectomy performance on 3D printed bones, highlighting the impact of anatomical diversity and changing operating modalities on the acquisition of new surgical skills.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36718031
doi: 10.5152/iao.2023.22851
pmc: PMC9984964
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16-21Références
Laryngoscope. 2011 Apr;121(4):831-7
pubmed: 21433021
Int J Surg. 2014;12(2):141-5
pubmed: 24316389
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2018 May;127(5):338-343
pubmed: 29667491
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Mar;144(3):357-64
pubmed: 21493196
Ann Surg. 2016 Nov;264(5):703-709
pubmed: 27429036
Cochlear Implants Int. 2017 Mar;18(2):89-96
pubmed: 28238283
Laryngoscope. 2010 Jul;120(7):1417-21
pubmed: 20578231
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Oct;141(10):913-8
pubmed: 26334610
Laryngoscope. 2021 Aug;131(8):1855-1862
pubmed: 33780005
Laryngoscope. 2008 Jun;118(6):1040-6
pubmed: 18354339
J Surg Educ. 2011 Jan-Feb;68(1):44-51
pubmed: 21292215
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jun;156(6):1142-1149
pubmed: 28322125
J Laryngol Otol. 2012 Jul;126(7):663-9
pubmed: 22643313
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):838-844
pubmed: 27177182
J Laryngol Otol. 2018 Mar;132(3):257-263
pubmed: 29363437
Laryngoscope. 2016 Aug;126(8):1883-8
pubmed: 26452157
Laryngoscope. 2009 Dec;119(12):2402-10
pubmed: 19885831
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2018 Apr;52(3):169-172
pubmed: 29325502
Ann Surg. 2012 Jun;255(6):1184-9
pubmed: 22566016
BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 06;4(2):e004391
pubmed: 24503305
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Oct 13;43:31
pubmed: 25312968
Clin Otolaryngol. 2020 Sep;45(5):746-753
pubmed: 32391949