Black and Latinx Primary Caregiver Considerations for Developing and Implementing a Machine Learning-Based Model for Detecting Child Abuse and Neglect With Implications for Racial Bias Reduction: Qualitative Interview Study With Primary Caregivers.

abuse child child abuse and neglect community development electronic health records epidemic implementation machine learning machine learning–based risk models model neglect pediatric emergency departments primary caregivers

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 Jan 2023
Historique:
received: 09 06 2022
accepted: 15 08 2022
revised: 22 07 2022
entrez: 31 1 2023
pubmed: 1 2 2023
medline: 1 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Child abuse and neglect, once viewed as a social problem, is now an epidemic. Moreover, health providers agree that existing stereotypes may link racial and social class issues to child abuse. The broad adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) in clinical settings offers a new avenue for addressing this epidemic. To reduce racial bias and improve the development, implementation, and outcomes of machine learning (ML)-based models that use EHR data, it is crucial to involve marginalized members of the community in the process. This study elicited Black and Latinx primary caregivers' viewpoints regarding child abuse and neglect while living in underserved communities to highlight considerations for designing an ML-based model for detecting child abuse and neglect in emergency departments (EDs) with implications for racial bias reduction and future interventions. We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth interviews with 20 Black and Latinx primary caregivers whose children were cared for at a single pediatric tertiary-care ED to gain insights about child abuse and neglect and their experiences with health providers. Three central themes were developed in the coding process: (1) primary caregivers' perspectives on the definition of child abuse and neglect, (2) primary caregivers' experiences with health providers and medical documentation, and (3) primary caregivers' perceptions of child protective services. Our findings highlight essential considerations from primary caregivers for developing an ML-based model for detecting child abuse and neglect in ED settings. This includes how to define child abuse and neglect from a primary caregiver lens. Miscommunication between patients and health providers can potentially lead to a misdiagnosis, and therefore, have a negative impact on medical documentation. Additionally, the outcome and application of the ML-based models for detecting abuse and neglect may cause additional harm than expected to the community. Further research is needed to validate these findings and integrate them into creating an ML-based model.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Child abuse and neglect, once viewed as a social problem, is now an epidemic. Moreover, health providers agree that existing stereotypes may link racial and social class issues to child abuse. The broad adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) in clinical settings offers a new avenue for addressing this epidemic. To reduce racial bias and improve the development, implementation, and outcomes of machine learning (ML)-based models that use EHR data, it is crucial to involve marginalized members of the community in the process.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study elicited Black and Latinx primary caregivers' viewpoints regarding child abuse and neglect while living in underserved communities to highlight considerations for designing an ML-based model for detecting child abuse and neglect in emergency departments (EDs) with implications for racial bias reduction and future interventions.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth interviews with 20 Black and Latinx primary caregivers whose children were cared for at a single pediatric tertiary-care ED to gain insights about child abuse and neglect and their experiences with health providers.
RESULTS RESULTS
Three central themes were developed in the coding process: (1) primary caregivers' perspectives on the definition of child abuse and neglect, (2) primary caregivers' experiences with health providers and medical documentation, and (3) primary caregivers' perceptions of child protective services.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our findings highlight essential considerations from primary caregivers for developing an ML-based model for detecting child abuse and neglect in ED settings. This includes how to define child abuse and neglect from a primary caregiver lens. Miscommunication between patients and health providers can potentially lead to a misdiagnosis, and therefore, have a negative impact on medical documentation. Additionally, the outcome and application of the ML-based models for detecting abuse and neglect may cause additional harm than expected to the community. Further research is needed to validate these findings and integrate them into creating an ML-based model.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36719717
pii: v7i1e40194
doi: 10.2196/40194
pmc: PMC9929722
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e40194

Informations de copyright

©Aviv Y Landau, Ashley Blanchard, Nia Atkins, Stephanie Salazar, Kenrick Cato, Desmond U Patton, Maxim Topaz. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 31.01.2023.

Références

Milbank Q. 2022 Mar;100(1):134-150
pubmed: 34812541
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2010 Nov;19(6):535-41
pubmed: 20606597
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Dec;86:217-222
pubmed: 30359821
Am J Public Health. 2017 Feb;107(2):274-280
pubmed: 27997240
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jan 29;29(3):512-519
pubmed: 35024857
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2016 Dec;55(14):1318-1327
pubmed: 26896341
J Pediatr. 2018 Jul;198:137-143.e1
pubmed: 29606408
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2002 Mar-Apr;47(2):80-96
pubmed: 12019990
J Community Health. 2001 Aug;26(4):271-84
pubmed: 11488516
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 May 31;10(5):e36388
pubmed: 35639450
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Mar;41:40-8
pubmed: 25466427
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 2;370(1):6-8
pubmed: 24304001
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jan 29;29(3):576-580
pubmed: 35024859
JAMA. 2015 Apr 14;313(14):1417-8
pubmed: 25751310
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Dec 3;19(1):250
pubmed: 31795998
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;25(2):142-149
pubmed: 28641385
JAMIA Open. 2021 Aug 17;4(3):ooab051
pubmed: 34661067
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 26;16(2):e0247404
pubmed: 33635890
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Jun;68:11-24
pubmed: 28391074

Auteurs

Aviv Y Landau (AY)

School of Social Policy & Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Ashley Blanchard (A)

New York Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.

Nia Atkins (N)

Columbia College, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Stephanie Salazar (S)

Columbia School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Kenrick Cato (K)

University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Phildelphia, PA, United States.
Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Phildelphia, PA, United States.

Desmond U Patton (DU)

School of Social Policy & Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Phildelphia, PA, United States.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Phildelphia, PA, United States.

Maxim Topaz (M)

Columbia University School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Columbia University Data Science Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Classifications MeSH