Immune and genomic biomarkers of immunotherapy response in cancer of unknown primary.
Biomarkers, Tumor
Gene Expression Profiling
Genetic Markers
Immunotherapy
Translational Medical Research
Journal
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2023
01 2023
Historique:
accepted:
02
01
2023
entrez:
31
1
2023
pubmed:
1
2
2023
medline:
3
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers where a primary tissue of origin (TOO) is uncertain. Most patients with CUP have limited treatment options and poor survival outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be efficacious in some patients with CUP, but the optimal predictive biomarkers are unknown. We therefore assessed immune and genomic biomarkers as well as predicted TOO in patients with CUP, including a subset treated with ICIs. Patients with CUP were subject to gene-expression profiling (GEP) and DNA panel sequencing. Immune and stromal-related gene expression was explored by NanoString, including genes associated with immunotherapy response (IR) in other solid malignancies. ICI responsive cancer types were assigned based on Food and Drug Administration-approved indications, and either detection of a latent primary tumor or the TOO was suspected based on genomics informed pathology review. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) and gene mutations were also assessed. A total of 219 patients with CUP were included, 215 assessed for TOO in a previous study, with the majority (163) receiving both RNA and DNA tests. Of GEP profiled cases, 33% (59/175) had a high IR gene-expression score. Of the DNA sequenced cases, 16% (32/203) had high TMB (>10 mutations/Mb), including two with mismatch repair deficiency. Low correlation was observed between TMB and an IR score (R=0.26, p<0.001). Among 110 CUPs with a latent primary or suspected TOO, 47% (52/110) belonged to ICI-responsive cancer types. More than half of the CUPs had at least one feature that may predict ICI response (high IR score, high TMB, ICI-responsive cancer type). Among patients with CUP treated with ICIs, 8/28 (29%) responded (2 complete responses and 6 partial responses). Among non-responders, 9 had stable and 11 had progressive disease. All responders had a high IR score (7/8) and/or high TMB (3/8), while most (5/8) belonged to ICI-responsive cancer types. These features were detected at a lower frequency in non-responders and mostly in patients with stable disease. A significant fraction of CUP tumors had genomic features previously associated with ICI response. High IR score was the most sensitive predictive feature of ICI response, warranting evaluation in a larger patient series.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers where a primary tissue of origin (TOO) is uncertain. Most patients with CUP have limited treatment options and poor survival outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be efficacious in some patients with CUP, but the optimal predictive biomarkers are unknown. We therefore assessed immune and genomic biomarkers as well as predicted TOO in patients with CUP, including a subset treated with ICIs.
METHODS
Patients with CUP were subject to gene-expression profiling (GEP) and DNA panel sequencing. Immune and stromal-related gene expression was explored by NanoString, including genes associated with immunotherapy response (IR) in other solid malignancies. ICI responsive cancer types were assigned based on Food and Drug Administration-approved indications, and either detection of a latent primary tumor or the TOO was suspected based on genomics informed pathology review. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) and gene mutations were also assessed.
RESULTS
A total of 219 patients with CUP were included, 215 assessed for TOO in a previous study, with the majority (163) receiving both RNA and DNA tests. Of GEP profiled cases, 33% (59/175) had a high IR gene-expression score. Of the DNA sequenced cases, 16% (32/203) had high TMB (>10 mutations/Mb), including two with mismatch repair deficiency. Low correlation was observed between TMB and an IR score (R=0.26, p<0.001). Among 110 CUPs with a latent primary or suspected TOO, 47% (52/110) belonged to ICI-responsive cancer types. More than half of the CUPs had at least one feature that may predict ICI response (high IR score, high TMB, ICI-responsive cancer type). Among patients with CUP treated with ICIs, 8/28 (29%) responded (2 complete responses and 6 partial responses). Among non-responders, 9 had stable and 11 had progressive disease. All responders had a high IR score (7/8) and/or high TMB (3/8), while most (5/8) belonged to ICI-responsive cancer types. These features were detected at a lower frequency in non-responders and mostly in patients with stable disease.
CONCLUSIONS
A significant fraction of CUP tumors had genomic features previously associated with ICI response. High IR score was the most sensitive predictive feature of ICI response, warranting evaluation in a larger patient series.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36720497
pii: jitc-2022-005809
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005809
pmc: PMC10098268
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: RJH is a shareholder in Telix Pharmaceuticals and a Founder and Director of PreMIT. CSK is on the advisory board of AstraZeneca, BMS and Roche. CS is on the advisory board of MSD, Sanofi, Janssen, and GSK. ADeF has received grant funding from AstraZeneca, unrelated to this study; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Références
Oncologist. 2020 Nov;25(11):e1807-e1811
pubmed: 32893931
Cell Rep. 2013 Jan 31;3(1):246-59
pubmed: 23318258
J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Sep 13;7(1):251
pubmed: 31519206
Genome Med. 2017 Apr 19;9(1):34
pubmed: 28420421
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1823-1833
pubmed: 27718847
J Med Case Rep. 2017 Mar 27;11(1):82
pubmed: 28343447
Oncologist. 2021 Mar;26(3):e394-e402
pubmed: 33219618
Science. 2018 Oct 12;362(6411):
pubmed: 30309915
Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 5:v133-8
pubmed: 26314775
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2022 Apr 7;6(1):24
pubmed: 35393508
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;36(7):633-641
pubmed: 29337640
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Aug 1;21(15):3561-8
pubmed: 25695692
Ann Oncol. 2022 Feb;33(2):216-226
pubmed: 34843940
Ann Oncol. 2015 Feb;26(2):259-71
pubmed: 25214542
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 4;371(23):2189-2199
pubmed: 25409260
Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 15;77(16):4238-4246
pubmed: 28642281
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Mar 1;25(5):1564-1573
pubmed: 30442684
Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Sep;51(9):e13583
pubmed: 33970501
J Clin Invest. 2017 Aug 1;127(8):2930-2940
pubmed: 28650338
Cancer Discov. 2018 Jul;8(7):822-835
pubmed: 29773717
Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):124-8
pubmed: 25765070
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):40-49
pubmed: 26182302
Cancer Res. 2016 Mar 1;76(5):999-1008
pubmed: 26833127
Science. 2015 Oct 9;350(6257):207-211
pubmed: 26359337
Genome Res. 2018 Nov;28(11):1747-1756
pubmed: 30341162
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 15;15(4):e0222551
pubmed: 32294103
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 Feb;5:221-230
pubmed: 33625877
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb;19(2):75-90
pubmed: 34642484
Ann Oncol. 2016 Feb;27(2):339-44
pubmed: 26578722
Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2016 Nov;2(6):a001180
pubmed: 27900363
Cancer Cell. 2019 Feb 11;35(2):238-255.e6
pubmed: 30753825
Carcinogenesis. 2007 Mar;28(3):529-36
pubmed: 16920734
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 10;31(2):217-23
pubmed: 23032625
JCI Insight. 2019 Mar 21;4(6):
pubmed: 30895946
EBioMedicine. 2020 Dec;62:103131
pubmed: 33254023
Bioinformatics. 2016 Sep 15;32(18):2847-9
pubmed: 27207943
Oncotarget. 2019 Mar 5;10(19):1840-1849
pubmed: 30956762
J Pathol. 2023 Jan;259(1):81-92
pubmed: 36287571
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2500-2501
pubmed: 29262275
Cancer Cell. 2018 May 14;33(5):843-852.e4
pubmed: 29657128
Hepatology. 2014 Jun;59(6):2397-402
pubmed: 24123296
Lancet. 2016 Apr 30;387(10030):1837-46
pubmed: 26970723
Nat Med. 2020 Nov;26(11):1733-1741
pubmed: 32895571
Eur J Cancer. 2018 May;94:179-186
pubmed: 29571084
Br J Cancer. 2020 Jun;122(12):1732-1743
pubmed: 32327707
J Immunother Cancer. 2022 May;10(5):
pubmed: 35618285