Routinely used interventions to improve attachment in infants and young children: a national survey and two systematic reviews.
ATTACHMENT
CAREGIVERS
CHILD
INFANT
MENTAL HEALTH
META-ANALYSES
PARENTING
SURVEY
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Journal
Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)
ISSN: 2046-4924
Titre abrégé: Health Technol Assess
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9706284
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2023
02 2023
Historique:
entrez:
1
2
2023
pubmed:
2
2
2023
medline:
3
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Attachment refers to an infant's innate tendency to seek comfort from their caregiver. Research shows that attachment is important in promoting healthy social and emotional development. Many parenting interventions have been developed to improve attachment outcomes for children. However, numerous interventions used in routine practice have a limited evidence base, meaning that we cannot be sure if they are helpful or harmful. This research aimed to conduct a large-scale survey to identify what interventions are being used in UK services to improve child attachment; conduct a systematic review to evaluate the evidence for parenting attachment interventions; and develop recommendations for future research and practice. We worked closely with our Expert Reference Group to plan a large-scale survey focused on relevant UK services. We then conducted two systematic reviews. One searched for all randomised controlled trial evidence for any attachment parenting intervention. The second searched for all research for the top 10 routinely used interventions identified from the survey. The survey collected 625 responses covering 734 UK services. The results identified the 10 most commonly used interventions. The responses showed a limited use of validated measures and a wide variety of definitions of attachment. For the first review, seven studies were included from 2516 identified records. These were combined with results from previous reviews conducted by the team. Meta-analyses showed that, overall, parenting interventions are effective in reducing disorganised attachment (pooled odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.77) and increasing secure attachment (pooled odds ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.36 to 2.52). The second review searched the literature for the top 10 routinely used interventions identified by the survey; 61 studies were included from 1198 identified records. The results showed that many of the most commonly used interventions in UK services have a weak evidence base and those with the strongest evidence base are not as widely used. There is a need for better links between research and practice to ensure that interventions offered to families are safe and effective. Possible reasons for the disparity include the cost and accessibility of training. There is also a need for improved understanding by professionals regarding the meaning of attachment. Although the survey had good geographical spread, most respondents were based in England. For review 2 we were unable to access a large number of papers; however, we conducted extensive reference checking to account for this. There is a need for robust research to test the efficacy of routinely used attachment interventions. Research could also explore why routinely used interventions are not consistently subject to thorough evaluation; how to embed dissemination, cost-effectiveness, fidelity and sustainability into research; and how to keep clinical practice up to date with research developments. This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019137362. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Attachment refers to an infant’s natural instinct to seek comfort from their main carers. There are four ways in which infants show attachment (‘attachment patterns’). These are known as secure, insecure-avoidant, insecure-resistant and disorganised. Secure attachment usually occurs with consistent and responsive parenting/caregiving and is linked with positive social and emotional child development. Inconsistent, neglectful or abusive parenting/caregiving can lead to problems with attachment, including disorganised attachment, and is linked to poorer outcomes. Parenting support, education and therapies help parents improve infant attachment and their child’s outcomes. We surveyed UK services to see what they offered families with attachment problems. A total of 734 UK services responded. This identified 10 therapies or support packages most commonly offered to parents. We checked what research had been done on these. We found very little. We found 61 studies of support packages with quite good evidence, but these were generally not ones offered by UK services. We also looked in detail at research for all types of support/therapies to improve attachment. We looked for the best research (called ‘randomised controlled trials’); 26 studies had tested therapies to see if they improved secure attachment and 20 had tested whether or not they improved (i.e. reduced) disorganised attachment. We found that these therapies or support packages are good at increasing secure attachment and improving disorganised attachment. Mostly they did this by helping parents/caregivers improve caregiving and particularly how sensitive and responsive they are to their child and their needs. Currently, practice is not following research, and research is not being done to properly evaluate current practice. We need to improve the evidence and the way it links to practice, including how those organising and paying for services are made aware of up-to-date research to make sure that the best treatments are available. High-quality training for staff is also important.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Attachment refers to an infant's innate tendency to seek comfort from their caregiver. Research shows that attachment is important in promoting healthy social and emotional development. Many parenting interventions have been developed to improve attachment outcomes for children. However, numerous interventions used in routine practice have a limited evidence base, meaning that we cannot be sure if they are helpful or harmful.
OBJECTIVES
This research aimed to conduct a large-scale survey to identify what interventions are being used in UK services to improve child attachment; conduct a systematic review to evaluate the evidence for parenting attachment interventions; and develop recommendations for future research and practice.
DESIGN AND METHODS
We worked closely with our Expert Reference Group to plan a large-scale survey focused on relevant UK services. We then conducted two systematic reviews. One searched for all randomised controlled trial evidence for any attachment parenting intervention. The second searched for all research for the top 10 routinely used interventions identified from the survey.
RESULTS
The survey collected 625 responses covering 734 UK services. The results identified the 10 most commonly used interventions. The responses showed a limited use of validated measures and a wide variety of definitions of attachment. For the first review, seven studies were included from 2516 identified records. These were combined with results from previous reviews conducted by the team. Meta-analyses showed that, overall, parenting interventions are effective in reducing disorganised attachment (pooled odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.77) and increasing secure attachment (pooled odds ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.36 to 2.52). The second review searched the literature for the top 10 routinely used interventions identified by the survey; 61 studies were included from 1198 identified records. The results showed that many of the most commonly used interventions in UK services have a weak evidence base and those with the strongest evidence base are not as widely used.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a need for better links between research and practice to ensure that interventions offered to families are safe and effective. Possible reasons for the disparity include the cost and accessibility of training. There is also a need for improved understanding by professionals regarding the meaning of attachment.
LIMITATIONS
Although the survey had good geographical spread, most respondents were based in England. For review 2 we were unable to access a large number of papers; however, we conducted extensive reference checking to account for this.
FUTURE WORK
There is a need for robust research to test the efficacy of routinely used attachment interventions. Research could also explore why routinely used interventions are not consistently subject to thorough evaluation; how to embed dissemination, cost-effectiveness, fidelity and sustainability into research; and how to keep clinical practice up to date with research developments.
STUDY REGISTRATION
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019137362.
FUNDING
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in
Attachment refers to an infant’s natural instinct to seek comfort from their main carers. There are four ways in which infants show attachment (‘attachment patterns’). These are known as secure, insecure-avoidant, insecure-resistant and disorganised. Secure attachment usually occurs with consistent and responsive parenting/caregiving and is linked with positive social and emotional child development. Inconsistent, neglectful or abusive parenting/caregiving can lead to problems with attachment, including disorganised attachment, and is linked to poorer outcomes. Parenting support, education and therapies help parents improve infant attachment and their child’s outcomes. We surveyed UK services to see what they offered families with attachment problems. A total of 734 UK services responded. This identified 10 therapies or support packages most commonly offered to parents. We checked what research had been done on these. We found very little. We found 61 studies of support packages with quite good evidence, but these were generally not ones offered by UK services. We also looked in detail at research for all types of support/therapies to improve attachment. We looked for the best research (called ‘randomised controlled trials’); 26 studies had tested therapies to see if they improved secure attachment and 20 had tested whether or not they improved (i.e. reduced) disorganised attachment. We found that these therapies or support packages are good at increasing secure attachment and improving disorganised attachment. Mostly they did this by helping parents/caregivers improve caregiving and particularly how sensitive and responsive they are to their child and their needs. Currently, practice is not following research, and research is not being done to properly evaluate current practice. We need to improve the evidence and the way it links to practice, including how those organising and paying for services are made aware of up-to-date research to make sure that the best treatments are available. High-quality training for staff is also important.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Attachment refers to an infant’s natural instinct to seek comfort from their main carers. There are four ways in which infants show attachment (‘attachment patterns’). These are known as secure, insecure-avoidant, insecure-resistant and disorganised. Secure attachment usually occurs with consistent and responsive parenting/caregiving and is linked with positive social and emotional child development. Inconsistent, neglectful or abusive parenting/caregiving can lead to problems with attachment, including disorganised attachment, and is linked to poorer outcomes. Parenting support, education and therapies help parents improve infant attachment and their child’s outcomes. We surveyed UK services to see what they offered families with attachment problems. A total of 734 UK services responded. This identified 10 therapies or support packages most commonly offered to parents. We checked what research had been done on these. We found very little. We found 61 studies of support packages with quite good evidence, but these were generally not ones offered by UK services. We also looked in detail at research for all types of support/therapies to improve attachment. We looked for the best research (called ‘randomised controlled trials’); 26 studies had tested therapies to see if they improved secure attachment and 20 had tested whether or not they improved (i.e. reduced) disorganised attachment. We found that these therapies or support packages are good at increasing secure attachment and improving disorganised attachment. Mostly they did this by helping parents/caregivers improve caregiving and particularly how sensitive and responsive they are to their child and their needs. Currently, practice is not following research, and research is not being done to properly evaluate current practice. We need to improve the evidence and the way it links to practice, including how those organising and paying for services are made aware of up-to-date research to make sure that the best treatments are available. High-quality training for staff is also important.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36722615
doi: 10.3310/IVCN8847
pmc: PMC9900465
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-226Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Dec;74(6):1006-16
pubmed: 17154731
Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Jul;33(5):698-711
pubmed: 23742782
Infant Ment Health J. 2020 May;41(3):299-312
pubmed: 32045020
Infant Ment Health J. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):81-5
pubmed: 25424409
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;61(4):417-424
pubmed: 31677152
Ment Health Serv Res. 2005 Mar;7(1):5-20
pubmed: 15832690
Attach Hum Dev. 2014;16(4):371-86
pubmed: 24972105
Dev Psychol. 2018 Dec;54(12):2316-2327
pubmed: 30335427
Infant Ment Health J. 2016 Mar-Apr;37(2):97-114
pubmed: 26939716
Dev Sci. 2019 Mar;22(2):e12753
pubmed: 30230658
Attach Hum Dev. 2003 Sep;5(3):313-20
pubmed: 12944229
Child Dev. 2017 Sep;88(5):1447-1452
pubmed: 28737839
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 Nov-Dec;48(6):666-78
pubmed: 24165363
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1995 Feb;36(2):225-48
pubmed: 7759588
Attach Hum Dev. 2021 Dec;23(6):795-813
pubmed: 32308130
Child Dev. 1996 Oct;67(5):2512-26
pubmed: 9022253
J Fam Psychol. 2006 Jun;20(2):266-274
pubmed: 16756402
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1985;50(1-2):147-66
pubmed: 4069126
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Feb;45(2):283-91
pubmed: 25074759
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015 Jul;20(3):266-74
pubmed: 25819293
Pediatrics. 2016 Jun;137(6):
pubmed: 27221288
Early Hum Dev. 2009 Jul;85(7):443-7
pubmed: 19356866
Infant Behav Dev. 2017 Feb;46:14-32
pubmed: 27870988
Child Care Health Dev. 2018 Sep;44(5):766-775
pubmed: 30043463
Child Dev. 2020 Mar;91(2):563-576
pubmed: 30815861
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015 Jul;16(4):383-97
pubmed: 25381790
Dev Psychol. 1997 Jul;33(4):681-92
pubmed: 9232383
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Apr;83(2):416-29
pubmed: 25486375
Dev Psychol. 1999 Nov;35(6):1399-413
pubmed: 10563730
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002 Oct;43(7):835-46
pubmed: 12405473
Attach Hum Dev. 2005 Dec;7(4):349-67
pubmed: 16332580
Attach Hum Dev. 2014;16(4):315-28
pubmed: 24972101
Attach Hum Dev. 2020 Dec;22(6):705-726
pubmed: 31726954
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997 Nov;38(8):1039-50
pubmed: 9413801
Infant Behav Dev. 2020 Feb;58:101413
pubmed: 31877392
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(52):vii-xxviii, 1-347
pubmed: 26177494
Psychol Med. 2017 Jun;47(8):1478-1488
pubmed: 28137316
Dev Psychopathol. 2021 Aug;33(3):1026-1040
pubmed: 32662374
Attach Hum Dev. 1999 Apr;1(1):34-66
pubmed: 11707882
Attach Hum Dev. 2000 Apr;2(1):48-70
pubmed: 11707892
Dev Psychopathol. 2017 May;29(2):651-673
pubmed: 28401843
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2016 Feb;21(1):64-74
pubmed: 32680360
Encephale. 2017 Apr;43(2):99-103
pubmed: 27216594
Child Dev. 2012 Mar-Apr;83(2):591-610
pubmed: 22235928
Infant Ment Health J. 2005 May;26(3):231-249
pubmed: 28682506
Child Dev. 2012 Mar-Apr;83(2):623-36
pubmed: 22239483
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;2(2):133-40
pubmed: 26359749
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 May;43(5):568-77
pubmed: 15100563
Child Dev. 2004 Jul-Aug;75(4):1188-213
pubmed: 15260872
Dev Psychol. 2006 Nov;42(6):1143-53
pubmed: 17087548
Community Pract. 2011 Jan;84(1):35-7
pubmed: 21370692
Child Adolesc Social Work J. 2009 Aug;26(4):321-332
pubmed: 22065891
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 14;12(7):e0180858
pubmed: 28708838
Psychol Bull. 2003 Mar;129(2):195-215
pubmed: 12696839
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019 Sep;3(9):605-615
pubmed: 31324597
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jun 14;24(2):e61-e71
pubmed: 28632983
Attach Hum Dev. 2003 Sep;5(3):223-44
pubmed: 12944216
BMJ. 2009 Apr 14;338:b974
pubmed: 19366752
Stat Med. 2006 Oct 30;25(20):3443-57
pubmed: 16345038
Child Abuse Negl. 2016 Mar;53:128-37
pubmed: 26746112
Infant Ment Health J. 2011 Mar;32(2):207-231
pubmed: 26908296
Autism. 2015 Jul;19(5):588-603
pubmed: 24919961
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687
pubmed: 24609605
Child Dev. 2010 Mar-Apr;81(2):435-56
pubmed: 20438450
Dev Psychopathol. 2020 Feb;32(1):123-137
pubmed: 30636649
Attach Hum Dev. 2018 Oct;20(5):455-472
pubmed: 29359632
Child Dev. 1990 Oct;61(5):1617-27
pubmed: 2245751
Attach Hum Dev. 2014;16(2):103-36
pubmed: 24547936
World Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;17(1):30-38
pubmed: 29352529
Dev Psychol. 2002 Sep;38(5):806-21
pubmed: 12220057
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919
pubmed: 27733354
Child Dev. 1985 Feb;56(1):1-14
pubmed: 3987395
PLoS One. 2017 May 4;12(5):e0176218
pubmed: 28472162
Infant Ment Health J. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):556-74
pubmed: 26551929
J Pers. 1990 Mar;58(1):141-61
pubmed: 2198336
Infant Ment Health J. 2016 Sep;37(5):525-36
pubmed: 27548644
Attach Hum Dev. 2017 Dec;19(6):559-579
pubmed: 28714772
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;22(4):561-571
pubmed: 28712311
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Dec;74(6):1017-26
pubmed: 17154732
Child Dev. 1995 Dec;66(6):1798-816
pubmed: 8556900
Assessment. 2020 Jun;27(4):749-765
pubmed: 30175603
Infant Ment Health J. 2005 May;26(3):191-216
pubmed: 28682504
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1987 May;26(3):303-7
pubmed: 3597284
Dev Psychopathol. 2006 Summer;18(3):623-49
pubmed: 17152394
Infant Ment Health J. 2015 Jan-Feb;36(1):53-61
pubmed: 25445216
Child Dev. 1997 Aug;68(4):571-91
pubmed: 9306636
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;22(3):483-499
pubmed: 28447470
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Dec;74(6):994-1005
pubmed: 17154730
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2020 May-Jun;49(3):378-390
pubmed: 30649970
Attach Hum Dev. 2003 Jun;5(2):120-35
pubmed: 12791563
Dev Psychopathol. 2004 Spring;16(2):253-71
pubmed: 15487595
Dev Psychopathol. 2012 Feb;24(1):23-34
pubmed: 22292991
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Mar 21;11:49
pubmed: 23518176
Br J Psychiatry. 2003 May;182:420-7
pubmed: 12724245
Dev Psychopathol. 2011 Feb;23(1):195-210
pubmed: 21262048
Dev Psychopathol. 2009 Fall;21(4):1311-34
pubmed: 19825270
Dev Psychopathol. 2018 Feb;30(1):1-11
pubmed: 28397637
Infant Ment Health J. 2015 Jan-Feb;36(1):12-29
pubmed: 25451617
Child Dev. 1991 Feb;62(1):199-209
pubmed: 2022136
Infant Ment Health J. 2006 Sep;27(5):466-493
pubmed: 28640397
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Feb;64(1):64-73
pubmed: 8907085
Child Dev. 1998 Aug;69(4):1107-28
pubmed: 9768489
Child Youth Care Forum. 2016;45:625-653
pubmed: 27429536
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;46(3):263-74
pubmed: 15755303
Dev Psychopathol. 2013 Nov;25(4 Pt 1):919-30
pubmed: 24229539
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1985;50(1-2):233-56
pubmed: 4069129
Infant Ment Health J. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):542-55
pubmed: 26551600
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;19(3):355-66
pubmed: 23575458
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2008 Feb;13(1):52
pubmed: 32847154
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;52(8):819-33
pubmed: 21554304
Dev Psychopathol. 2017 May;29(2):617-636
pubmed: 28401850
J Clin Psychol. 2018 Aug;74(8):1333-1345
pubmed: 29797361
Dev Psychopathol. 2011 Feb;23(1):131-48
pubmed: 21262044
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019 Sep;69(3):383-387
pubmed: 31107793
Child Dev. 2015 Nov-Dec;86(6):1673-84
pubmed: 26344398
Child Care Health Dev. 2009 Sep;35(5):613-23
pubmed: 19323672