Antenatal consultation and deliberation: adapting to parental preferences.


Journal

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association
ISSN: 1476-5543
Titre abrégé: J Perinatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8501884

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2023
Historique:
received: 25 09 2022
accepted: 10 01 2023
revised: 28 12 2022
medline: 10 7 2023
pubmed: 2 2 2023
entrez: 1 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To analyze and compare perspectives on antenatal consultation and decision-making from participants with varying degrees of prematurity experience and clinician-experts. Open-ended interviews structured around topics previously identified by recognized clinician-experts were conducted with participants having different levels of prematurity experience. Analysis used mixed methods (thematic and mental models analysis). Secondary sub-group comparisons were performed, based on degree of experience. Non-clinician participants' (n = 80) perspectives differed regarding: amount and content of information desired, decision-making strategies, and who - parent or clinician - should direct consultations. Most wanted to retain decisional authority, all recognized their emotional limitations and many advocated for deliberation support. Participants worried parents' would regret choosing palliative care contrary to clinicians. Bereaved parents often saw issues differently. Parents approach risk and decision-making for extremely premature infants in a personal fashion. They need personalized support tailored to their unique circumstances, decision-making preferences, and emotions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36725985
doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01605-8
pii: 10.1038/s41372-023-01605-8
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

895-902

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Références

Janvier A, Lorenz JM, Lantos JD. Antenatal counselling for parents facing an extremely preterm birth: limitations of the medical evidence. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101:800–4.
doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02695.x pubmed: 22497312
Gaucher N, Payot A. Focusing on relationships, not information, respects autonomy during antenatal consultations. Acta Paediatr. 2017;106:14–20.
doi: 10.1111/apa.13590 pubmed: 27628458
Kim UO, Basir MA. Informing and educating parents about the risks and outcomes of prematurity. Clin Perinatol. 2014;41:979–91.
doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2014.08.015 pubmed: 25459785
Guillén Ú, Suh S, Munson D, Posencheg M, Truitt E, Zupancic JA, et al. Development and pretesting of a decision-aid to use when counseling parents facing imminent extreme premature delivery. J Pediatr. 2012;160:382–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.08.070 pubmed: 22048056
Haward MF, Gaucher N, Payot A, Robson K, Janvier A. Personalized decision making: practical recommendations for antenatal counseling for fragile neonates. Clin Perinatol. 2017;44:429–45.
doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2017.01.006 pubmed: 28477670
Grobman WA, Kavanaugh K, Moro T, DeRegnier RA, Savage T. Providing advice to parents for women at acutely high risk of periviable delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:904–9.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181da93a7 pubmed: 20410761 pmcid: 3735348
Payot A, Gendron S, Lefebvre F, Doucet H. Deciding to resuscitate extremely premature babies: how do parents and neonatologists engage in the decision? Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1487–500.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.016 pubmed: 17196312
Fischhoff B, Barnato AE. Value awareness: a new goal for end-of-life decision making. MDM Policy Pr. 2019;4:2381468318817523.
Haward MF, Janvier A, Lorenz JM, Fischhoff B. Counseling parents at risk of delivery of an extremely premature infant: Differing strategies. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017;8:243–52.
doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1394399 pubmed: 29048264
Morgan MGFB, Bostrom A, Atman C. Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
Bruine de Bruin W, Bostrom A. Assessing what to address in science communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:14062–8.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212729110 pubmed: 23942122 pmcid: 3752171
Haward MF, Lorenz JM, Janvier A, Fischhoff B. Bereaved parents: insights for the antenatal consultation. Am J Perinatol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731651 . Epub ahead of print.
Bourque CJ, Dahan S, Mantha G, Robson K, Reichherzer M, Janvier A. Improving neonatal care with the help of veteran resource parents: an overview of current practices. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;23:44–51.
doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.10.005 pubmed: 29111298
Janvier A, Bourque CJ, Dahan S, Robson K, Barrington KJ. Integrating parents in neonatal and pediatric research. Neonatology 2019;115:283–91.
doi: 10.1159/000492502 pubmed: 30799397
Gaucher N, Nadeau S, Barbier A, Janvier A, Payot A. Personalized antenatal consultations for preterm labor: responding to mothers’ expectations. J Pediatr. 2016;178:130–4.e7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.08.006 pubmed: 27597734
Lantos JD. Ethical problems in decision making in the neonatal ICU. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1851–60.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1801063 pubmed: 30403936
Goggins KM, Wallston KA, Nwosu S, Schildcrout JS, Castel L, Kripalani S. Health literacy, numeracy, and other characteristics associated with hospitalized patients’ preferences for involvement in decision making. J Health Commun. 2014;19:29–43.
doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.938841 pubmed: 25315582 pmcid: 4306288
Reyna VF, Nelson WL, Han PK, Dieckmann NF. How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychol Bull. 2009;135:943–73.
doi: 10.1037/a0017327 pubmed: 19883143 pmcid: 2844786
Lipkus IM, Samsa G, Rimer BK. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Mak. 2001;21:37–44.
doi: 10.1177/0272989X0102100105
Kaemingk BD, Carroll K, Thorvilson MJ, Schaepe KS, Collura CA. Uncertainty at the limits of viability: a qualitative study of antenatal consultations. Pediatrics. 2021;147:e20201865.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1865 pubmed: 33658319
Kharrat A, Moore GP, Beckett S, Nicholls SG, Sampson M, Daboval T. Antenatal consultations at extreme prematurity: a systematic review of parent communication needs. J Pediatr. 2018;196:109–15.e7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.067 pubmed: 29223461
Arnolds M, Xu L, Hughes P, McCoy J, Meadow W. Worth a try? Describing the experiences of families during the course of care in the neonatal intensive care unit when the prognosis is poor. J Pediatr. 2018;196:116–22.e3.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.12.050 pubmed: 29398049
Dahan S, Bourque CJ, Reichherzer M, Prince J, Mantha G, Savaria M, et al. Community, hope, and resilience: parental perspectives on peer support in neonatology. J Pediatr. 2022;243:85–90.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.11.060 pubmed: 34843711
Thivierge E, Luu TM, Bourque CJ, Duquette LA, Pearce R, Jaworski M, Barrington KJ, et al. Guilt and regrets experienced by parents of children born extremely preterm. J Pediatr. 2022:S0022-3476(22)01019-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.10.042 . Epub ahead of print.
Hynan MT, Steinberg Z, Baker L, Cicco R, Geller PA, Lassen S, et al. Recommendations for mental health professionals in the NICU. J Perinatol. 2015;35:S14–8.
doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.144 pubmed: 26597800 pmcid: 4660044
Snaman JM, Kaye EC, Torres C, Gibson DV, Baker JN. Helping parents live with the hole in their heart: The role of health care providers and institutions in the bereaved parents’ grief journeys. Cancer 2016;122:2757–65.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.30087 pubmed: 27244654
Zaal-Schuller IH, Geurtzen R, Willems DL, de Vos MA, Hogeveen M. What hinders and helps in the end-of-life decision-making process for children: Parents’ and physicians’ views. Acta Paediatr. 2022;111:873–87.
Fischhoff B. Hindsight foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1975;1:288–99.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.288
Baron J, Hershey JC. Outcome bias in decision evaluation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:569–79.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.569 pubmed: 3367280
Geurtzen R, van Heijst AFJ, Draaisma JMT, Kuijpers L, Woiski M, Scheepers HCJ, et al. Development of nationwide recommendations to support prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity. Pediatrics. 2019;143:e20183253.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3253 pubmed: 31160512
Levetown M, Committee on B. Communicating with children and families: from everyday interactions to skill in conveying distressing information. Pediatrics. 2008;121:e1441–e60.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0565 pubmed: 18450887

Auteurs

Marlyse F Haward (MF)

Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. mhaward@aol.com.

John M Lorenz (JM)

Department of Pediatrics, Morgan Stanley Children Hospital of New York and Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.

Annie Janvier (A)

Department of Pediatrics, Bureau de l'Éthique Clinique, Université de Montréal and Division of Neonatology, Research Center, Clinical Ethics Unit, Palliative Care Unit, Unité de recherche en éthique clinique et partenariat famille, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Baruch Fischhoff (B)

Institute for Politics and Strategy, and Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH