Tenecteplase Treatment and Thrombus Characteristics Associated With Early Reperfusion: An EXTEND-IA TNK Trials Analysis.


Journal

Stroke
ISSN: 1524-4628
Titre abrégé: Stroke
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0235266

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 3 2 2023
medline: 3 3 2023
entrez: 2 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Intracranial occlusion site, contrast permeability, and clot burden are thrombus characteristics that influence alteplase-associated reperfusion. In this study, we assessed the reperfusion efficacy of tenecteplase and alteplase in subgroups based on these characteristics in a pooled analysis of the EXTEND-IA TNK trial (Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Before Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke). Patients with large vessel occlusion were randomized to treatment with tenecteplase (0.25 or 0.4 mg/kg) or alteplase before thrombectomy in hospitals across Australia and New Zealand (2015-2019). The primary outcome, early reperfusion, was defined as the absence of retrievable thrombus or >50% reperfusion on first-pass angiogram. We compared the effect of tenecteplase versus alteplase overall, and in subgroups, based on the following measured with computed tomography angiography: intracranial occlusion site, contrast permeability (measured via residual flow grades), and clot burden (measured via clot burden scores). We adjusted for covariates using mixed effects logistic regression models. Tenecteplase was associated with higher odds of early reperfusion (75/369 [20%] versus alteplase: 9/96 [9%], adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.18 [95% CI, 1.03-4.63]). The difference between thrombolytics was notable in occlusions with low clot burden (tenecteplase: 66/261 [25%] versus alteplase: 5/67 [7%], aOR, 3.93 [95% CI, 1.50-10.33]) when compared to high clot burden lesions (tenecteplase: 9/108 [8%] versus alteplase: 4/29 [14%], aOR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.16-2.06]; Tenecteplase demonstrates superior early reperfusion versus alteplase in lesions with low clot burden. Reperfusion efficacy remains limited in internal carotid artery occlusions and lesions with high clot burden. Further innovation in thrombolytic therapies are required.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Intracranial occlusion site, contrast permeability, and clot burden are thrombus characteristics that influence alteplase-associated reperfusion. In this study, we assessed the reperfusion efficacy of tenecteplase and alteplase in subgroups based on these characteristics in a pooled analysis of the EXTEND-IA TNK trial (Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Before Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke).
METHODS
Patients with large vessel occlusion were randomized to treatment with tenecteplase (0.25 or 0.4 mg/kg) or alteplase before thrombectomy in hospitals across Australia and New Zealand (2015-2019). The primary outcome, early reperfusion, was defined as the absence of retrievable thrombus or >50% reperfusion on first-pass angiogram. We compared the effect of tenecteplase versus alteplase overall, and in subgroups, based on the following measured with computed tomography angiography: intracranial occlusion site, contrast permeability (measured via residual flow grades), and clot burden (measured via clot burden scores). We adjusted for covariates using mixed effects logistic regression models.
RESULTS
Tenecteplase was associated with higher odds of early reperfusion (75/369 [20%] versus alteplase: 9/96 [9%], adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.18 [95% CI, 1.03-4.63]). The difference between thrombolytics was notable in occlusions with low clot burden (tenecteplase: 66/261 [25%] versus alteplase: 5/67 [7%], aOR, 3.93 [95% CI, 1.50-10.33]) when compared to high clot burden lesions (tenecteplase: 9/108 [8%] versus alteplase: 4/29 [14%], aOR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.16-2.06];
CONCLUSIONS
Tenecteplase demonstrates superior early reperfusion versus alteplase in lesions with low clot burden. Reperfusion efficacy remains limited in internal carotid artery occlusions and lesions with high clot burden. Further innovation in thrombolytic therapies are required.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36727510
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.041061
doi:

Substances chimiques

Fibrinolytic Agents 0
Tenecteplase WGD229O42W
Tissue Plasminogen Activator EC 3.4.21.68

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

706-714

Investigateurs

Richard Dowling (R)
Steven Bush (S)
Rebecca Scroop (R)
Mark Brooks (M)
Hamed Asadi (H)
Timothy Ang (T)
Ferdinand Miteff (F)
Christopher Levi (C)
Henry Zhao (H)
Felix Ng (F)
Fana Alemseged (F)
Henry Rice (H)
Laetitia de Villiers (L)
Kendal Redmond (K)
David Leggett (D)

Auteurs

Vignan Yogendrakumar (V)

Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (V.Y., L.C., P.G., J.B., N.Y., B.Y., G.S., M.W.P., G.A.D., S.M.D., B.C.V.C.).

Leonid Churilov (L)

Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (V.Y., L.C., P.G., J.B., N.Y., B.Y., G.S., M.W.P., G.A.D., S.M.D., B.C.V.C.).

Prodipta Guha (P)

Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (V.Y., L.C., P.G., J.B., N.Y., B.Y., G.S., M.W.P., G.A.D., S.M.D., B.C.V.C.).

James Beharry (J)

Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (V.Y., L.C., P.G., J.B., N.Y., B.Y., G.S., M.W.P., G.A.D., S.M.D., B.C.V.C.).
Department of Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia (J.B., V.T.).

Peter J Mitchell (PJ)

Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (P.J.M., B.Y., P.M.D.).

Timothy J Kleinig (TJ)

Department of Neurology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia (T.J.K.).

Nawaf Yassi (N)

Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (V.Y., L.C., P.G., J.B., N.Y., B.Y., G.S., M.W.P., G.A.D., S.M.D., B.C.V.C.).
Population Health and Immunity Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia (N.Y.).

Vincent Thijs (V)

Department of Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia (J.B., V.T.).
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (V.T.).

Teddy Y Wu (TY)

Department of Neurology, Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand (T.Y.W.).

Helen Brown (H)

Department of Neurology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (H.B.).

Helen M Dewey (HM)

Department of Neurosciences, Eastern Health and Eastern Health Clinical School, Clayton, Victoria, Australia (H.M.D.).

Tissa Wijeratne (T)

Melbourne Medical School, Department of Medicine and Neurology, University of Melbourne and Western Health, St Albans, Australia (T.W.).

Bernard Yan (B)

Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (V.Y., L.C., P.G., J.B., N.Y., B.Y., G.S., M.W.P., G.A.D., S.M.D., B.C.V.C.).
Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (P.J.M., B.Y., P.M.D.).

Gagan Sharma (G)

Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (V.Y., L.C., P.G., J.B., N.Y., B.Y., G.S., M.W.P., G.A.D., S.M.D., B.C.V.C.).

Patricia M Desmond (PM)

Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia (P.J.M., B.Y., P.M.D.).

Mark W Parsons (MW)

Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (V.Y., L.C., P.G., J.B., N.Y., B.Y., G.S., M.W.P., G.A.D., S.M.D., B.C.V.C.).
Department of Neurology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia (M.W.P.).

Geoffrey A Donnan (GA)

Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (V.Y., L.C., P.G., J.B., N.Y., B.Y., G.S., M.W.P., G.A.D., S.M.D., B.C.V.C.).

Stephen M Davis (SM)

Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (V.Y., L.C., P.G., J.B., N.Y., B.Y., G.S., M.W.P., G.A.D., S.M.D., B.C.V.C.).

Bruce C V Campbell (BCV)

Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (V.Y., L.C., P.G., J.B., N.Y., B.Y., G.S., M.W.P., G.A.D., S.M.D., B.C.V.C.).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH