Performance of the SEDLine Monitor: Age Dependency and Time Delay.
Journal
Anesthesia and analgesia
ISSN: 1526-7598
Titre abrégé: Anesth Analg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1310650
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 10 2023
01 10 2023
Historique:
medline:
18
9
2023
pubmed:
3
2
2023
entrez:
2
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Devices monitoring the hypnotic component of general anesthesia can help to guide anesthetic management. The main purposes of these devices are the titration of anesthesia dose. While anesthesia at low doses can result in awareness with intraoperative memory formation, excessive administration of anesthetics may be associated with an increased risk of postoperative neurocognitive disorder. We have previously shown for various indices that they are significantly influenced by the patient's age and that the monitors have a significant time delay. Here, we evaluated the influence of patient's age and time delay on the patient state index (PSI) of the SEDLine monitor. To analyze the influence of the patient's age, we replayed 2 minutes of electroencephalography (EEG) of 141 patients (19-88 years, ASA I-IV) undergoing general anesthesia maintained with desflurane, sevoflurane, or propofol to the SEDLine monitor. We extracted the PSI as well as the spectral edge frequency (SEF) and performed a linear regression analysis. For evaluation of the time delay, we replayed 5 minutes of EEG of stable episodes of adequate anesthesia (PSI between 25 and 50) or light sedation/wake (PSI >70) in different orders to the SEDLine to simulate sudden changes between the states. Time delays were defined as the required time span of the monitor to reach the stable target index. PSI and SEF increased significantly with the patient's age. These findings did not depend on the administered anesthetic. The evaluation of the correlation between SEF and PSI showed a strong correlation with Spearman's correlation coefficient of ρ = 0.86 (0.82; 0.89). The time delays depended on the type of transition. We found a median time delay of 54 (Min: 46; Max: 61) seconds for the important transition between adequate anesthesia and awake and 55 (Min: 50; Max: 67) seconds in the other direction. With our analyses, we show that the indices presented on the SEDLine display, the PSI and the SEF, increase with age for patients under general anesthesia. Additionally, a delay of the PSI to react to sudden neurophysiologic changes due to dose of the maintenance anesthetic is of a time course that is clinically significant. These factors should be considered when navigating anesthesia relying on only the proprietary index for the SEDLine monitor.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Devices monitoring the hypnotic component of general anesthesia can help to guide anesthetic management. The main purposes of these devices are the titration of anesthesia dose. While anesthesia at low doses can result in awareness with intraoperative memory formation, excessive administration of anesthetics may be associated with an increased risk of postoperative neurocognitive disorder. We have previously shown for various indices that they are significantly influenced by the patient's age and that the monitors have a significant time delay. Here, we evaluated the influence of patient's age and time delay on the patient state index (PSI) of the SEDLine monitor.
METHODS
To analyze the influence of the patient's age, we replayed 2 minutes of electroencephalography (EEG) of 141 patients (19-88 years, ASA I-IV) undergoing general anesthesia maintained with desflurane, sevoflurane, or propofol to the SEDLine monitor. We extracted the PSI as well as the spectral edge frequency (SEF) and performed a linear regression analysis. For evaluation of the time delay, we replayed 5 minutes of EEG of stable episodes of adequate anesthesia (PSI between 25 and 50) or light sedation/wake (PSI >70) in different orders to the SEDLine to simulate sudden changes between the states. Time delays were defined as the required time span of the monitor to reach the stable target index.
RESULTS
PSI and SEF increased significantly with the patient's age. These findings did not depend on the administered anesthetic. The evaluation of the correlation between SEF and PSI showed a strong correlation with Spearman's correlation coefficient of ρ = 0.86 (0.82; 0.89). The time delays depended on the type of transition. We found a median time delay of 54 (Min: 46; Max: 61) seconds for the important transition between adequate anesthesia and awake and 55 (Min: 50; Max: 67) seconds in the other direction.
CONCLUSIONS
With our analyses, we show that the indices presented on the SEDLine display, the PSI and the SEF, increase with age for patients under general anesthesia. Additionally, a delay of the PSI to react to sudden neurophysiologic changes due to dose of the maintenance anesthetic is of a time course that is clinically significant. These factors should be considered when navigating anesthesia relying on only the proprietary index for the SEDLine monitor.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36727845
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006369
pii: 00000539-202310000-00027
doi:
Substances chimiques
Propofol
YI7VU623SF
Hypnotics and Sedatives
0
Anesthetics
0
Sevoflurane
38LVP0K73A
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
887-895Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 International Anesthesia Research Society.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Aldecoa C, Bettelli G, Bilotta F, et al. European Society of Anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34:192–214.
Chan MTV, Hedrick TL, Egan TD, et al.; Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) 6 Workgroup. American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on the Role of Neuromonitoring in Perioperative Outcomes: Electroencephalography. Anesth Analg. 2020;130:1278–1291.
Wildes TS, Mickle AM, Ben Abdallah A, et al.; ENGAGES Research Group. Effect of Electroencephalography-Guided Anesthetic Administration on Postoperative Delirium Among Older Adults Undergoing Major Surgery: the ENGAGES Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;321:473–483.
Punjasawadwong Y, Chau-In W, Laopaiboon M, Punjasawadwong S, Pin-On P. Processed electroencephalogram and evoked potential techniques for amelioration of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction following non-cardiac and non-neurosurgical procedures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:CD011283.
Brown EN, Lydic R, Schiff ND. General anesthesia, sleep, and coma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2638–2650.
Pandit JJ, Andrade J, Bogod DG, et al.; Royal College of Anaesthetists. 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: summary of main findings and risk factors. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:549–559.
Obert DP, Schweizer C, Zinn S, et al. The influence of age on EEG-based anaesthesia indices. J Clin Anesth. 2021;73:110325.
Ni K, Cooter M, Gupta DK, et al. Paradox of age: older patients receive higher age-adjusted minimum alveolar concentration fractions of volatile anaesthetics yet display higher bispectral index values. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123:288–297.
Shander A, Lobel GP, Mathews DM. Brain monitoring and the depth of anesthesia: another goldilocks dilemma. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:705–709.
Masimo. Operator’s Manual SEDLine Sedation Monitor. 2017. Accessed September 20, 2020. https://techdocs.masimo.com/contentassets/c19b67c39baa430daf34fb73907d8578/lab-7373e-master.pdf .
Kreuzer M, Zanner R, Pilge S, Paprotny S, Kochs EF, Schneider G. Time delay of monitors of the hypnotic component of anesthesia: analysis of state entropy and index of consciousness. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:315–319.
Zanner R, Schneider G, Meyer A, Kochs E, Kreuzer M. Time delay of the qCON monitor and its performance during state transitions. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021;35:379–386.
Lutz R, Müller C, Dragovic S, et al. The absence of dominant alpha-oscillatory EEG activity during emergence from delta-dominant anesthesia predicts neurocognitive impairment- results from a prospective observational trial. JClinAnesth. 2022;82:110949.
Perouansky M, Sleigh JW. A crack at MAC. Anesthesiology. 2021;134:835–837.
Mapleson WW. Effect of age on MAC in humans: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 1996;76:179–185.
Kreuzer M, Stern MA, Hight D, et al. Spectral and entropic features are altered by age in the electroencephalogram in patients under sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2020;132:1003–1016.
Sarkela M, Mustola S, Seppanen T, et al. Automatic analysis and monitoring of burst suppression in anesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput. 2002;17:125–134.
Kreuzer M, Kochs EF, Pilge S, Stockmanns G, Schneider G. Construction of the electroencephalogram player: a device to present electroencephalogram data to electroencephalogram-based anesthesia monitors. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:135–139.
Hentschke H, Stuttgen MC. Computation of measures of effect size for neuroscience data sets. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;34:1887–1894.
Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:1315–1316.
Chander D, Garcia PS, MacColl JN, Illing S, Sleigh JW. Electroencephalographic variation during end maintenance and emergence from surgical anesthesia. PLoS One. 2014;9:e106291.
Marciani MG, Maschio M, Spanedda F, Caltagirone C, Gigli GL, Bernardi G. Quantitative EEG evaluation in normal elderly subjects during mental processes: age-related changes. Int J Neurosci.1994;76:131–140.
Dijk DJ, Beersma DG, van den Hoofdakker RH. All night spectral analysis of EEG sleep in young adult and middle-aged male subjects. Neurobiol Aging. 1989;10:677–682.
Schultz A, Grouven U, Zander I, Beger FA, Siedenberg M, Schultz B. Age-related effects in the EEG during propofol anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48:27–34.
Drover DR, Lemmens HJ, Pierce ET, et al. Patient state index: titration of delivery and recovery from propofol, alfentanil, and nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:82–89.
Besch G, Liu N, Samain E, et al. Occurrence of and risk factors for electroencephalogram burst suppression during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:749–756.
Dutton RC, Smith WD, Smith NT. Wakeful response to command indicates memory potential during emergence from general anesthesia. J Clin Monit 1995;11:35–40.
Zanner R, Pilge S, Kochs EF, Kreuzer M, Schneider G. Time delay of electroencephalogram index calculation: analysis of cerebral state, bispectral, and Narcotrend indices using perioperatively recorded electroencephalographic signals. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:394–399.
Obert D, Sepulveda P, Schneider G, Kreuzer M. Time-delay of index calculation during induction of general anesthesia. presented at: Annual Meeting of the International Anesthesia Research Society (Conference Canceled); 2020, May 14–18 San Francisco, CA.
Muhlhofer WG, Zak R, Kamal T, et al. Burst-suppression ratio underestimates absolute duration of electroencephalogram suppression compared with visual analysis of intraoperative electroencephalogram. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:755–761.
Schuller PJ, Newell S, Strickland PA, Barry JJ. Response of bispectral index to neuromuscular block in awake volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(suppl 1):i95–i103.
Belletti A, Naorungroj T, Yanase F, Eastwood GM, Weinberg L, Bellomo R. Normative values for SedLine-based processed electroencephalography parameters in awake volunteers: a prospective observational study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021;35:1411–1419.
Barreto Chang OL, Kreuzer M, Morgen DF, Possin KL, García PS. Ketamine associated intraoperative electroencephalographic signatures of elderly patients with and without preoperative cognitive impairment. Anesth Analg. 2022;135:679–682
Schüler SS, Petersen CL, West NC, Ansermino JM, Merchant RN, Görges M. The effect of ketamine on depth of hypnosis indices during total intravenous anesthesia—a comparative study using a novel electroencephalography case replay system. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021;35:1027–1036.
Antognini JF, Schwartz K. Exaggerated anesthetic requirements in the preferentially anesthetized brain. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:1244–1249.
Hendrickx JFA, Eger EI II, Sonner JM, Shafer SL. Is synergy the rule? A review of anesthetic interactions producing hypnosis and immobility. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:494–506.
Van Cleve WC, Nair BG, Rooke GA. Associations between age and dosing of volatile anesthetics in 2 academic hospitals. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:645–651.
Werry C, Neulinger A, Eckert O, Lehmkuhl P, Pichlmayr I. [Age-related correlation between EEG parameters and depth of anesthesia under propofol. Effect of fentanyl]. Anaesthesist. 1996;45:722–730.
Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, et al. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:1502–1516.
Sepulveda PO, Mora X. [Reevaluation of the time course of the effect of propofol described with the Schnider pharmacokinetic model]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012;59:542–548.