Comparison of Humeral-Head Replacement with Glenoid-Reaming Arthroplasty (Ream and Run) Versus Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Matched-Cohort Study.
Journal
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
ISSN: 1535-1386
Titre abrégé: J Bone Joint Surg Am
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0014030
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 04 2023
05 04 2023
Historique:
medline:
7
4
2023
pubmed:
3
2
2023
entrez:
2
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Glenoid component failure is a major concern after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). Ream and run (RnR) is an alternative procedure that may avoid glenoid-related complications. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of RnR versus aTSA in younger patients with advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis. This was a retrospective matched-cohort study of 110 patients who underwent aTSA and 57 patients who underwent RnR; patients were <66 years of age and had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Propensity matching was performed using 21 preoperative variables. Pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) scores, satisfaction with outcome, and revision data were analyzed. Mixed-effects models examined the association of preoperative variables with outcomes. Thirty-nine patient pairs were matched. All patients were male, with a mean age of 58.6 ± 7.3 years and a mean follow-up 4.4 ± 2.3 years. The aTSA cohort had better final Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. However, in the mixed-effects model analysis, arthroplasty type was not associated with outcome. At 2 years postoperatively, a significantly greater percentage of aTSA patients achieved the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for the ASES (100% versus 79.2%; p = 0.01) and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (89.7% versus 75%; p = 0.02) for the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. At >5-year follow-up, there were no significant differences between the cohorts in the percentage who achieved the MCID, SCB, or patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the ASES, SST, and VAS for pain. Three patients underwent revision arthroplasty for pain after RnR, at a mean of 1.9 ± 1.7 years. Two patients underwent revision arthroplasty for glenoid loosening at 9.2 and 14 years after aTSA. RnR and aTSA had comparable outcomes in most analyses. The greater early revision rate after RnR should focus attention on optimizing patient selection and postoperative management. Revision for glenoid loosening is a concern among younger and active patients. Longer-term study is needed to better understand the relative benefits and disadvantages of these procedures. Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Glenoid component failure is a major concern after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). Ream and run (RnR) is an alternative procedure that may avoid glenoid-related complications. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of RnR versus aTSA in younger patients with advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
METHODS
This was a retrospective matched-cohort study of 110 patients who underwent aTSA and 57 patients who underwent RnR; patients were <66 years of age and had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Propensity matching was performed using 21 preoperative variables. Pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) scores, satisfaction with outcome, and revision data were analyzed. Mixed-effects models examined the association of preoperative variables with outcomes.
RESULTS
Thirty-nine patient pairs were matched. All patients were male, with a mean age of 58.6 ± 7.3 years and a mean follow-up 4.4 ± 2.3 years. The aTSA cohort had better final Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. However, in the mixed-effects model analysis, arthroplasty type was not associated with outcome. At 2 years postoperatively, a significantly greater percentage of aTSA patients achieved the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for the ASES (100% versus 79.2%; p = 0.01) and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (89.7% versus 75%; p = 0.02) for the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. At >5-year follow-up, there were no significant differences between the cohorts in the percentage who achieved the MCID, SCB, or patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the ASES, SST, and VAS for pain. Three patients underwent revision arthroplasty for pain after RnR, at a mean of 1.9 ± 1.7 years. Two patients underwent revision arthroplasty for glenoid loosening at 9.2 and 14 years after aTSA.
CONCLUSIONS
RnR and aTSA had comparable outcomes in most analyses. The greater early revision rate after RnR should focus attention on optimizing patient selection and postoperative management. Revision for glenoid loosening is a concern among younger and active patients. Longer-term study is needed to better understand the relative benefits and disadvantages of these procedures.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36727972
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00650
pii: 00004623-202304050-00002
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
509-517Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H400 ).
Références
Denard PJ, Raiss P, Sowa B, Walch G. Mid- to long-term follow-up of total shoulder arthroplasty using a keeled glenoid in young adults with primary glenohumeral arthritis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2013 Jul;22(7):894-900.
Gauci MO, Bonnevialle N, Moineau G, Baba M, Walch G, Boileau P. Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis: all-polyethylene versus metal-backed glenoid. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2018 Apr 1;100-B(4):485-92.
Kusnezov N, Dunn JC, Parada SA, Kilcoyne K, Waterman BR. Clinical Outcomes of Anatomical Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Young, Active Population. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Jul-Aug;45(5):E273-82.
Luedke C, Kissenberth MJ, Tolan SJ, Hawkins RJ, Tokish JM. Outcomes of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with B2 Glenoids: A Systematic Review. JBJS Rev. 2018 Apr;6(4):e7.
Matsen FA 3rd, Clinton J, Lynch J, Bertelsen A, Richardson ML. Glenoid component failure in total shoulder arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2008 Apr;90(4):885-96.
McLendon PB, Schoch BS, Sperling JW, Sánchez-Sotelo J, Schleck CD, Cofield RH. Survival of the pegged glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty: part II. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2017 Aug;26(8):1469-76.
Papadonikolakis A, Neradilek MB, Matsen FA 3rd. Failure of the glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of the English-language literature between 2006 and 2012. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 2013 Dec 18;95(24):2205-12.
Raiss P, Bruckner T, Rickert M, Walch G. Longitudinal observational study of total shoulder replacements with cement: fifteen to twenty-year follow-up. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2014 Feb 5;96(3):198-205.
Walch G, Young AA, Boileau P, Loew M, Gazielly D, Molé D. Patterns of loosening of polyethylene keeled glenoid components after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study with more than five years of follow-up. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2012 Jan 18;94(2):145-50.
Young A, Walch G, Boileau P, Favard L, Gohlke F, Loew M, Molé D. A multicentre study of the long-term results of using a flat-back polyethylene glenoid component in shoulder replacement for primary osteoarthritis. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume. 2011 Feb;93-B(2):210-6.
Golant A, Christoforou D, Zuckerman JD, Kwon YW. Return to sports after shoulder arthroplasty: a survey of surgeons’ preferences. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2012 Apr;21(4):554-60.
Bartels DW, Marigi E, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J. Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Anatomical Glenoid Component Loosening Was Not Universally Successful: A Detailed Analysis of 127 Consecutive Shoulders. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2021 May 19;103(10):879-86.
van den Bekerom MJ, Geervliet PC, Somford MP, van den Borne MJ, Boer R. Total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis: A systematic review of the literature at long-term follow-up. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2013 Jul;7(3):110-5.
Carter MJ, Mikuls TR, Nayak S, Fehringer EV, Michaud K. Impact of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty on Generic and Shoulder-Specific Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measures: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2012;94(17):e127.
Migliorini F, Vecchio G, Baroncini A, Pintore A, Oliva F, Maffulli N. Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty versus Hemiarthroplasty for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Applied Sciences 2021;11(21):10112.
Sayegh ET, Mascarenhas R, Chalmers PN, Cole BJ, Romeo AA, Verma NN. Surgical Treatment Options for Glenohumeral Arthritis in Young Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2015 Jun;31(6):1156-1166.e8.
Wagner ER, Farley KX, Higgins I, Wilson JM, Daly CA, Gottschalk MB. The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: rise and future projections compared with hip and knee arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020 Dec;29(12):2601-9.
Lynch JR, Franta AK, Montgomery WH Jr, Lenters TR, Mounce D, Matsen FA 3rd. Self-assessed outcome at two to four years after shoulder hemiarthroplasty with concentric glenoid reaming. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 2007 Jun;89(6):1284-92.
Garcia GH, Gowd AK, Liu JN, Malaret MR, Cabarcas BC, Romeo AA. Return to Sport Following Hemiarthroplasty With Concentric Reaming Versus Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Matched Pair Analysis. Orthopedics. 2019 Sep 1;42(5):276-84.
Gilmer BB, Comstock BA, Jette JL, Warme WJ, Jackins SE, Matsen FA. The prognosis for improvement in comfort and function after the ream-and-run arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis: an analysis of 176 consecutive cases. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2012 Jul 18;94(14):e102.
Gowd AK, Garcia GH, Liu JN, Malaret MR, Cabarcas BC, Romeo AA. Comparative analysis of work-related outcomes in hemiarthroplasty with concentric glenoid reaming and total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2019 Feb;28(2):244-51.
Matsen FA 3rd, Carofino BC, Green A, Hasan SS, Hsu JE, Lazarus MD, McElvany MD, Moskal MJ, Parsons IM 4th, Saltzman MD, Warme WJ. Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty with Nonprosthetic Glenoid Arthroplasty: The Ream-and-Run Procedure. JBJS Reviews. 2021 Aug 25;9(8).
Somerson JS, Neradilek MB, Service BC, Hsu JE, Russ SM, Matsen FA 3rd. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of the Ream-and-Run Procedure for Primary Glenohumeral Arthritis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2017 Aug 2;99(15):1291-304.
Virk MS, Thorsness RJ, Griffin JW, Kim J, Aiyash S, Malaret M, Romeo AA. Short-term Clinical Outcomes of Hemiarthroplasty With Concentric Glenoid Reaming: The Ream and Run Procedure. Orthopedics. 2018 Nov 1;41(6):e854-60.
Getz CL, Kearns KA, Padegimas EM, Johnston PS, Lazarus MD, Williams GRJ Jr. Survivorship of Hemiarthroplasty With Concentric Glenoid Reaming for Glenohumeral Arthritis in Young, Active Patients With a Biconcave Glenoid. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2017 Oct;25(10):715-23.
Matsen FA 3rd, Whitson A, Jackins SE, Neradilek MB, Warme WJ, Hsu JE. Ream and run and total shoulder: patient and shoulder characteristics in five hundred forty-four concurrent cases. International Orthopaedics. 2019 Sep;43(9):2105-15.
Levins J, Passarelli E, Adkins J, Molino J, Henry H, Paxton ES, Green A. Early outcome of humeral head replacement with glenoid reaming arthroplasty (Ream and Run) for treatment of advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022 Sep;31(9):1846-58.
Tashjian RZ, Bradley MP, Tocci S, Rey J, Henn RF, Green A. Factors influencing patient satisfaction after rotator cuff repair. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2007 Nov-Dec;16(6):752-8.
Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, Khoury A. Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 1999 Sep;14(6):756-60.
Austin PC. A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score. Statistics in Medicine. 2014 Mar 15;33(6):1057-69.
Simovitch R, Flurin PH, Wright T, Zuckerman JD, Roche CP. Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018 Feb;27(2):298-305.
Jain SS, DeFroda SF, Paxton ES, Green A. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Scores of Patients Undergoing Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2020 Jul 1;102(13):1186-1193.
Somerson JS, Matsen FA 3rd. Functional Outcomes of the Ream-and-Run Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Concise Follow-up of a Previous Report. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2017 Dec 6;99(23):1999-2003.
Roberson TA, Bentley JC, Griscom JT, Kissenberth MJ, Tolan SJ, Hawkins RJ, Tokish JM. Outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years: a systematic review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2017 Jul;26(7):1298-306.