Syringe Suction Yields Greater Adipocyte Viability for Fat Grafting: Fact or Fiction?
Journal
Annals of plastic surgery
ISSN: 1536-3708
Titre abrégé: Ann Plast Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7805336
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2023
01 06 2023
Historique:
medline:
20
6
2023
pubmed:
3
2
2023
entrez:
2
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Autologous fat grafting is a technique that can be used for cosmetic and reconstructive indications such as oncologic defects, aging, trauma, and congenital malformations. However, there is no standardized technique, and one of the main challenges is the unpredictable rate of fat resorption. When using fat grafting, it is crucial to understand the different factors that contribute to adipocyte viability. A literature search, using PubMed, was conducted in 2022 with variations of the terms "autologous fat grafting," "fat harvesting," "fat processing," and "fat injection." Articles in the English language that presented original data about different factors that may affect adipocyte viability for fat grafting were included in this review. Syringe suction harvests (lower pressures), compared with other methods with higher pressures, were found to have increased adipocyte counts and viability, but this did not translate clinically during in vivo studies. The studies have shown that, despite our efforts in optimizing fat harvest, processing, and injection, no statistical or clinical differences have been found. Additional studies are still needed to determine a universal protocol for optimal fat graft survival.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36729108
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003341
pii: 00000637-202306004-00022
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S430-S432Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: None.
Références
Kaufman MR, Bradley JP, Dickinson B, et al. Autologous fat transfer national consensus survey: trends in techniques for harvest, preparation, and application, and perception of short- and long-term results. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2007;119:323–331.
Bellini E, Grieco MP, Raposio E. The science behind autologous fat grafting. Ann Med Surg (Lond) . 2017;24:65–73.
Peer LA. Loss of weight and volume in human fat grafts with postulation of a “cell survival theory”. Plast Reconstr Surg . 1950;5:217–230.
Van der Meulen J. Considérations générales sur les greffes graisseuses et séro-graisseuses épiploïques et leurs principales applications. 1919.
Fischer A, Fischer GM. First surgical treatment for molding body's cellulite with three 5 mm incisions. Bull Int Acad Cosmet Surg . 1976;2:35–37.
Chajchir A, Benzaquen I, Wexler E, et al. Fat injection. Aesthetic Plast Surg . 1990;14:127–136.
Ellenbogen R. Free autogenous pearl fat grafts in the face—a preliminary report of a rediscovered technique. Ann Plast Surg . 1986;16:179–194.
Coleman SR. Structural fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J . 1998;18:386–388.
Coleman SR. Structural fat grafting: more than a permanent filler. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2006;118(suppl 3):108S–120S.
Abu-Ghname A, Perdanasari AT, Reece EM. Principles and applications of fat grafting in plastic surgery. Semin Plast Surg . 2019;33:147–154.
Doornaert M, Colle J, De Maere E, et al. Autologous fat grafting: latest insights. Ann Med Surg (Lond) . 2018;37:47–53.
Fontes T, Brandao I, Negrao R, et al. Autologous fat grafting: harvesting techniques. Ann Med Surg (Lond) . 2018;36:212–218.
Nava MB, Blondeel P, Botti G, et al. International expert panel consensus on fat grafting of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open . 2019;7:e2426.
Smith P, Adams WP Jr., Lipschitz AH, et al. Autologous human fat grafting: effect of harvesting and preparation techniques on adipocyte graft survival. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2006;117:1836–1844.
Leong DT, Hutmacher DW, Chew FT, et al. Viability and adipogenic potential of human adipose tissue processed cell population obtained from pump-assisted and syringe-assisted liposuction. J Dermatol Sci . 2005;37:169–176.
Shiffman MA, Mirrafati S. Fat transfer techniques: the effect of harvest and transfer methods on adipocyte viability and review of the literature. Dermatol Surg . 2001;27:819–826.
Campbell GL, Laudenslager N, Newman J. The effect of mechanical stress on adipocyte morphology and metabolism. Am J Cosmet Surg . 1987;4:89–94.
Shauly O, Gould DJ, Ghavami A. Fat grafting: basic science, techniques, and patient management. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open . 2022;10:e3987.
Xue EY, Narvaez L, Chu CK, et al. Fat processing techniques. Semin Plast Surg . 2020;34:11–16.
Conde-Green A, Baptista LS, de Amorin NF, et al. Effects of centrifugation on cell composition and viability of aspirated adipose tissue processed for transplantation. Aesthet Surg J . 2010;30:249–255.
Moore JH Jr., Kolaczynski JW, Morales LM, et al. Viability of fat obtained by syringe suction lipectomy: effects of local anesthesia with lidocaine. Aesthetic Plast Surg . 1995;19:335–339.
Ozsoy Z, Kul Z, Bilir A. The role of cannula diameter in improved adipocyte viability: a quantitative analysis. Aesthet Surg J . 2006;26:287–289.
Erdim M, Tezel E, Numanoglu A, et al. The effects of the size of liposuction cannula on adipocyte survival and the optimum temperature for fat graft storage: an experimental study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg . 2009;62:1210–1214.
Lee JH, Kirkham JC, McCormack MC, et al. The effect of pressure and shear on autologous fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2013;131:1125–1136.