The role of social norms on adolescent family planning in rural Kilifi county, Kenya.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 16 08 2021
accepted: 23 09 2022
entrez: 2 2 2023
pubmed: 3 2 2023
medline: 7 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite Kenya's encouraging progress in increasing access to modern contraception among youth, several barriers remain preventing large-scale efforts to reduce demand-side unmet need for family planning. Shifting social norms around the use and acceptability of modern contraception may represent a potent target for future interventions. However, the structure of normative influence on individual modern contraceptive use among youth needs to be determined. Therefore, our aim was to estimate the influence of individual and group-level normative influence on modern contraceptive use among adolescents from two villages in rural Kenya. Trained enumerators collected data from individuals aged 15-24 who provided oral informed consent, or parental informed consent, in two villages in rural Kilifi county. Participants completed a questionnaire related to modern contraceptive use and were asked to nominate one to five people (referents) with whom they spend free time. The enumerators photographed each individual who nominated at least one referent using Android phones and matched them with their nominated referents. Using this social network data, we estimated group-level normative influence by taking an average of referents' modern contraception use. We then explored associations between descriptive norms, injunctive norms, and network modern contraceptive use on individual modern contraceptive use, controlling for known confounders using logistic regression models. We also conducted sensitivity analyses to test a pattern of differential referent influence on individual modern contraceptive use. There was a positive association between pro-modern contraception descriptive and injunctive norms and individual modern contraception use (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05-1.6, and aOR = 1.31, CI = 1.06-1.62, respectively). Network modern contraceptive use was associated with individual use in the bivariate model (aOR = 2.57, CI = 1.6-4.12), but not in the multivariable model (aOR = 1.67, CI = 0.98-2.87). When stratified by sex and marital status, network modern contraceptive use was associated with individual modern contraceptive use among female participants (aOR = 2.9, CI = 1.31-6.42), and unmarried female participants (aOR = 5.26, CI = 1.34-20.69), but not among males. No interactive effects between norms variables were detected. Sensitivity analyses with a different estimate of network modern contraceptive use showed similar results. Social norms are multilevel phenomena that influence youth modern contraceptive use, especially among young women in rural Kenya. Unmarried women with modern contraceptive users in their social network may feel less stigma to use contraception themselves. This may reflect gendered differences in norms and social influence effects for modern contraceptive use. Future research should investigate group-level normative influence in relation to family planning behaviors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36730329
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275824
pii: PONE-D-21-26509
pmc: PMC9894424
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contraceptive Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0275824

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Lahiri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Comput Stat Data Anal. 2009 Jan 15;53(3):603-608
pubmed: 20084090
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 28;11(4):e0153907
pubmed: 27124177
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 29;17(1):604
pubmed: 28662695
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):493
pubmed: 32295574
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jan;7(1):
pubmed: 35027438
Lancet. 2018 Jun 30;391(10140):2642-2692
pubmed: 29753597
Glob Soc Welf. 2018 Mar;5(1):11-27
pubmed: 29744286
J Glob Health. 2020 Jun;10(1):010706
pubmed: 32373336
Soc Networks. 2021 Jul;66:171-184
pubmed: 34219904
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Mar 05;3(2):e000608
pubmed: 29527357
J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2009 Jul;(16):115-21
pubmed: 19538919
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 12;16(8):e0255954
pubmed: 34383836
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 11;20(1):1694
pubmed: 33176738
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018 Jun;16:124-131
pubmed: 29804756
Stud Fam Plann. 2018 Dec;49(4):345-365
pubmed: 30411794
Health Place. 2012 Jul;18(4):766-73
pubmed: 22579117
Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Dec 16;2:669760
pubmed: 34977861
Reprod Health. 2022 Feb 7;19(1):37
pubmed: 35130932
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Apr;64(4S):S31-S36
pubmed: 30914165
Health Commun. 2022 Nov;37(13):1573-1580
pubmed: 33761815
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 10;15:118
pubmed: 25884675
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015 Aug;19(3):203-34
pubmed: 25217363
Cult Health Sex. 2021 Dec;23(12):1748-1762
pubmed: 32795154
Stud Fam Plann. 2021 Sep;52(3):343-359
pubmed: 34255872
Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2008 Jun;34(2):79-88
pubmed: 18644759
Reprod Health. 2021 May 26;18(1):108
pubmed: 34039368
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 Sep;72(5):833-43
pubmed: 21906510
Stud Fam Plann. 2017 Dec;48(4):343-358
pubmed: 28940208
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(11):
pubmed: 34836912
SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec;2:100031
pubmed: 34927130

Auteurs

Shaon Lahiri (S)

Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Philosophy, Politics and Economics Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Center for Social Norms and Behavioral Dynamics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Jeffrey Bingenheimer (J)

Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.

Erica Sedlander (E)

Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Wolfgang Munar (W)

Department of Global Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.

Rajiv Rimal (R)

Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH