Biomarker Data from the Phase III KATHERINE Study of Adjuvant T-DM1 versus Trastuzumab for Residual Invasive Disease after Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.
Humans
Female
Trastuzumab
/ therapeutic use
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
B7-H1 Antigen
/ genetics
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ metabolism
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ adverse effects
Tumor Microenvironment
Journal
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
ISSN: 1557-3265
Titre abrégé: Clin Cancer Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502500
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 04 2023
14 04 2023
Historique:
received:
22
06
2022
revised:
31
10
2022
accepted:
01
02
2023
medline:
17
4
2023
pubmed:
3
2
2023
entrez:
2
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In KATHERINE, adjuvant T-DM1 reduced risk of disease recurrence or death by 50% compared with trastuzumab in patients with residual invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) comprised of HER2-targeted therapy and chemotherapy. This analysis aimed to identify biomarkers of response and differences in biomarker expression before and after NAT. Exploratory analyses investigated the relationship between invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and HER2 protein expression/gene amplification, PIK3CA hotspot mutations, and gene expression of HER2, PD-L1, CD8, predefined immune signatures, and Prediction Analysis of Microarray 50 intrinsic molecular subtypes, classified by Absolute Intrinsic Molecular Subtyping. HER2 expression on paired pre- and post-NAT samples was examined. T-DM1 appeared to improve IDFS versus trastuzumab across most biomarker subgroups, except the HER2 focal expression subgroup. High versus low HER2 gene expression in residual disease was associated with worse outcomes with trastuzumab [HR, 2.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32-3.11], but IDFS with T-DM1 was independent of HER2 expression level (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.56-1.83). Low PD-L1 gene expression in residual disease was associated with worse outcomes with trastuzumab (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-1.00), but not T-DM1 (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.59-1.87). PIK3CA mutations were not prognostic. Increased variability in HER2 expression was observed in post-NAT versus paired pre-NAT samples. T-DM1 appears to overcome HER2 resistance. T-DM1 benefit does not appear dependent on immune activation, but these results do not rule out an influence of the tumor immune microenvironment on the degree of response.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36730339
pii: 716372
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1989
pmc: PMC10102844
doi:
Substances chimiques
Trastuzumab
P188ANX8CK
B7-H1 Antigen
0
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine
SE2KH7T06F
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1569-1581Informations de copyright
©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.
Références
Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1519-25
pubmed: 27177864
Oncotarget. 2015 Mar 10;6(7):5449-64
pubmed: 25669979
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Sep 15;25(18):5717-5726
pubmed: 31227501
Cancer Cell. 2007 Oct;12(4):395-402
pubmed: 17936563
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35(2):141-148
pubmed: 28056202
Front Oncol. 2019 Aug 06;9:707
pubmed: 31448227
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1137-46
pubmed: 25130998
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2022 Jul 19;8(1):85
pubmed: 35853907
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 20;33(9):983-91
pubmed: 25534375
Cancer Cell. 2004 Aug;6(2):117-27
pubmed: 15324695
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Feb 01;3(2):227-234
pubmed: 27684533
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Jan 1;112(1):46-54
pubmed: 31037288
Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 20;11(1):385
pubmed: 31959756
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2022 Sep 19;8(1):106
pubmed: 36117201
Int J Cancer. 2016 Nov 15;139(10):2336-42
pubmed: 27428671
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 20;33(12):1340-7
pubmed: 25559813
Ann Oncol. 2014 Aug;25(8):1544-50
pubmed: 24608200
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Feb 9;19(1):16
pubmed: 28183321
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 10;38(35):4184-4193
pubmed: 33095682
Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Jul 08;16(4):R73
pubmed: 25005255
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Dec 4;105(23):1782-8
pubmed: 24262440
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Apr 20;43(7):e47
pubmed: 25605792
Cancer Treat Rev. 2020 Mar;84:101965
pubmed: 32000054
Ann Oncol. 2015 Dec;26(12):2429-36
pubmed: 26387142
Breast Cancer Res. 2013 Feb 07;15(1):R11
pubmed: 23391338
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Jan;89:27-35
pubmed: 29223479
Ann Oncol. 2016 Mar;27(3):480-7
pubmed: 26704052
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Aug 1;111(8):867-871
pubmed: 30888406
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;33(7):701-8
pubmed: 25605861
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 10;27(8):1160-7
pubmed: 19204204
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Dec 04;107(1):357
pubmed: 25479802
Oncotarget. 2015 Nov 3;6(34):36894-902
pubmed: 26384297
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Feb 1;21(3):569-76
pubmed: 25467182
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Sep 1;29(25):3351-7
pubmed: 21788566
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15545-50
pubmed: 16199517
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 20;32(33):3753-61
pubmed: 25332247
Genome Biol. 2014 Feb 03;15(2):R29
pubmed: 24485249
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):40-50
pubmed: 29233559
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):617-628
pubmed: 30516102
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jan;2(1):56-64
pubmed: 26469139
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Aug 1;22(15):3755-63
pubmed: 26920887
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Jul 3;105(13):960-7
pubmed: 23739063
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):542-9
pubmed: 26527775
BMC Cancer. 2019 May 30;19(1):517
pubmed: 31146717
Cancer Res. 2008 Nov 15;68(22):9221-30
pubmed: 19010894
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):e58-68
pubmed: 24480556
Lancet Oncol. 2014 May;15(6):640-7
pubmed: 24657003