Pharma-cartography: Navigating the complexities of antibiotic supply to rural livestock in West Bengal, India, through value chain and power dynamic analysis.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
30
08
2022
accepted:
18
01
2023
entrez:
2
2
2023
pubmed:
3
2
2023
medline:
7
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Antibiotic resistance threatens provision of healthcare and livestock production worldwide with predicted negative socioeconomic impact. Antibiotic stewardship can be considered of importance to people living in rural communities, many of which depend on agriculture as a source of food and income and rely on antibiotics to control infectious diseases in livestock. Consequently, there is a need for clarity of the structure of antibiotic value chains to understand the complexity of antibiotic production and distribution in community settings as this will facilitate the development of effective policies and interventions. We used a value chain approach to investigate how relationships, behaviours, and influences are established during antibiotic distribution. Interviews were conducted with key informants (n = 17), value chain stakeholders (n = 22), and livestock keeping households (n = 36) in Kolkata, and two rural sites in West Bengal, India. Value chain mapping and an assessment of power dynamics, using manifest content analysis, were conducted to investigate antibiotic distribution and identify entry points for antibiotic stewardship. The flow of antibiotics from manufacturer to stockists is described and mapped and two local level maps showing distribution to final consumers presented. The maps illustrate that antibiotic distribution occurred through numerous formal and informal routes, many of which circumvent antibiotic use legislation. This was partly due to limited institutional power of the public sector to govern value chain activities. A 'veterinary service lacuna' existed resulting in livestock keepers having higher reliance on private and informal providers, who often lacked legal mandates to prescribe and dispense antibiotics. The illegitimacy of many antibiotic prescribers blocked access to formal training who instead relied on mimicking the behaviour of more experienced prescribers-who also lacked access to stewardship guidelines. We argue that limited institutional power to enforce existing antibiotic legislation and guide antibiotic usage and major gaps in livestock healthcare services make attempts to curb informal prescribing unsustainable. Alternative options could include addressing public sector deficits, with respect to both healthcare services and antibiotic provision, and by providing resources such as locally relevant antibiotic guidelines to all antibiotic prescribers. In addition, legitimacy of informal prescribers could be revised, which may allow formation of associations or groups to incentivise good antibiotic practices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36730354
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281188
pii: PONE-D-22-22316
pmc: PMC9894437
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0281188Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S013598/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/S011269/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Hennessey et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jun;8(6):1828-1834
pubmed: 31334140
Med Anthropol. 2019 Apr;38(3):295-310
pubmed: 30526055
Lancet Infect Dis. 2011 Sep;11(9):692-701
pubmed: 21659004
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(11):
pubmed: 34740915
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Aug;27(8):403-4
pubmed: 11480201
Voluntas. 2021 Sep 10;:1-14
pubmed: 34522070
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Jan 13;11(1):
pubmed: 35052974
Food Nutr Bull. 2018 Dec;39(4):564-580
pubmed: 30482046
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Jul;180:105025
pubmed: 32438205
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Feb 26;7:55
pubmed: 32175334
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016 Nov 11;5:42
pubmed: 27857835
Front Microbiol. 2016 Nov 16;7:1860
pubmed: 27899924
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Nov 23;10(12):
pubmed: 34943645
Vet Ital. 2012 Jan-Mar;48(1):87-93
pubmed: 22485005
Agric Syst. 2017 Mar;152:1-17
pubmed: 28260829
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2021 Jun;74(6):417-420
pubmed: 33742170
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2016 Jan-Mar;8(1):47-51
pubmed: 26957869
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;21(1):107-115
pubmed: 32717205
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1599560
pubmed: 31294679
Vet World. 2018 Mar;11(3):274-280
pubmed: 29657416
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Oct 15;59 Suppl 3:S93-6
pubmed: 25261547
Antibiotics (Basel). 2018 Dec 22;8(1):
pubmed: 30583566
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 May 2;7:60
pubmed: 29744041
J Vet Med Educ. 2020 Oct;47(5):546-554
pubmed: 32516076
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Jul;26 Suppl 1:i53-62
pubmed: 21729918
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015 Apr;28(2):443-64
pubmed: 25788516
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Apr;275:113813
pubmed: 33721743
JAMA. 2000 Jan 19;283(3):373-80
pubmed: 10647801
Rev Sci Tech. 2015 Dec;34(3):767-77
pubmed: 27044150
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7113
pubmed: 32292185
Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2014;34(4):507-15
pubmed: 26761289
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 27;14(6):e0219002
pubmed: 31247028
Science. 2019 Sep 20;365(6459):
pubmed: 31604207
Fam Pract. 2010 Dec;27(6):684-90
pubmed: 20660529
Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Nov;86(11):1113-23
pubmed: 22033257