PREDICTION OF MACULAR HOLE SIZE PROGRESSION BASED ON BASELINE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY FINDINGS.
Journal
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)
ISSN: 1539-2864
Titre abrégé: Retina
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309919
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2023
01 03 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
3
2
2023
medline:
25
2
2023
entrez:
2
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To quantify the rate of idiopathic macular hole progression from presentation and identify factors that may influence stratification and urgency for surgical listing based on the initial optical coherence tomography scans. The minimal linear diameter (MLD), base diameter (BD), and hole height on nasal and temporal sides of idiopathic macular hole were measured on spectral domain optical coherence tomographies, on initial presentation and just before surgery. Mean hole height, hole height asymmetry (absolute difference between nasal and temporal height), MLD/BD, and MLD change per day (MLD/day) were calculated for each patient. Multivariable linear regression analysis with MLD/day as the dependent variable was performed to identify significant risk factors for MLD progression. Minimal linear diameter was grouped to quintiles: 1: ≤290 µ m, 2: >290 µ m and ≤385 µ m, 3: >385 µ m and ≤490 µ m, 4: >490 µ m and ≤623 µ m, and 5: >623 µ m. In 161 eyes (157 patients), we report significant associations with MLD/day: 1) MLD/BD ( P = 0.039) (i.e., wide BD relative to MLD lead to faster progression of MLD), 2) hole height asymmetry ( P = 0.006) (larger absolute difference between nasal and temporal hole height lead to faster progression), and 3) days between scans ( P < 0.001) (longer duration between scans had reduced MLD/day, indicating more rapid increase initially then plateaux), and relative to MLD Quintile 1, MLD Quintile 3 ( P = 0.002) and MLD Quintile 4 ( P = 0,008), and MLD Quintile 5 ( P < 0.001) all lead to a reduced MLD/day rate on multivariable regression. In addition to finding that the previously reported initial smaller MLD is a risk factor for rapid MLD progression, we report two novel findings, large hole height asymmetry and a low MLD/BD (wide base relative to MLD), that represent significant risk factors. These factors should be taken into consideration on presentation to stratify timing of surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36730582
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003680
pii: 00006982-202303000-00011
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
464-471Références
Berton M, Robins J, Frigo AC, Wong R. Rate of progression of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes before surgery. Eye (Lond) 2020;34:1386–1391.
Ch’ng SW, Patton N, Ahmed M, et al. The manchester large macular hole study: is it time to reclassify large macular holes? Am J Ophthalmol 2018;195:36–42.
Lin PF, Naveed H, Eleftheriadou M, et al. Cataract service redesign in the post-COVID-19 era. Br J Ophthalmol 2021;105:745–750.
Tornambe PE. Macular hole genesis: the hydration theory. Retina 2003;23:421–424.
Schubert HD, Kuang K, Kang F, et al. Macular holes: migratory gaps and vitreous as obstacles to glial closure. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1997;235:523–529.
Giani A, Cigada M, Choudhry N, et al. Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements on normal and pathologic eyes by different optical coherence tomography instruments. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150:815–824.
Qi Y, Yu Y, You Q, et al. Hole diameter ratio for prediction of anatomical outcomes in stage III or IV idiopathic macular holes. BMC Ophthalmol 2020;20:351.
Landa G, Gentile RC, Garcia PMT, et al. External limiting membrane and visual outcome in macular hole repair: spectral domain OCT analysis. Eye (Lond) 2012;26:61–69.
Chen Y, Nasrulloh Av, Wilson I, et al. Macular hole morphology and measurement using an automated three-dimensional image segmentation algorithm. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 2020;5:e000404.
Heng LZ, Pefianaki M, Hykin P, Patel PJ. Interobserver agreement in detecting spectral-domain optical coherence tomography features of diabetic macular edema. PLoS One 2015;10:e0126557.
Müller M, Dahmen G, Pörksen E, et al. Anterior chamber angle measurement with optical coherence tomography: intraobserver and interobserver variability. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:1803–1808.
Baumann C, Almarzooqi A, Blobner K, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of macular hole size measurements using optical coherence tomography. J Clin Med 2021;10:2899.
Kim JY, Kim RY, Kim M, et al. Progression rate analysis of idiopathic macular hole using optical coherence tomography before vitrectomy: short‐term results. Acta Ophthalmol 2022;100:919–926.
Madi HA, Dinah C, Rees J, Steel DHW. The case mix of patients presenting with full-thickness macular holes and progression before surgery: implications for optimum management. Ophthalmologica 2015;233:216–221.
Hikichi T, Yoshida A, Akiba J, Trempe CL. Natural outcomes of stage 1, 2, 3, and 4 idiopathic macular holes. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:517–520.
Duker JS, Kaiser PK, Binder S, et al. The international vitreomacular traction study group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole. Ophthalmology 2013;120:2611–2619.
Ullrich S, Haritoglou C, Gass C, et al. Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:390–393.
Venkatesh R, Mohan A, Sinha S, et al. Newer indices for predicting macular hole closure in idiopathic macular holes: a retrospective, comparative study. Indian J Ophthalmol 2019;67:1857.
Steel DHW, Parkes C, Papastavrou VT, et al. Predicting macular hole closure with ocriplasmin based on spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Eye (Lond) 2016;30:740–745.
Geenen C, Murphy DC, Sandinha MT, et al. Significance of preoperative external limiting membrane height on visual prognosis in patients undergoing macular hole surgery. Retina 2019;39:1392–1398.
Wakely L, Rahman R, Stephenson J. A comparison of several methods of macular hole measurement using optical coherence tomography, and their value in predicting anatomical and visual outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:1003–1007.
Steel DHW, Lotery AJ. Idiopathic vitreomacular traction and macular hole: a comprehensive review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Eye (Lond) 2013;27:S1–S21.
Cheng L, Azen SP, El-Bradey MH, et al. Effects of preoperative and postoperative epiretinal membranes on macular hole closure and visual restoration. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1514–1520.
Yooh HS, Brooks HL Jr, Capone A, et al. Ultrastructural features of tissue removed during idiopathic macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122:67–75.