Sympathetic Skin Response in Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow.


Journal

Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society
ISSN: 1537-1603
Titre abrégé: J Clin Neurophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8506708

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Nov 2022
Historique:
entrez: 2 2 2023
pubmed: 3 2 2023
medline: 3 2 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The sympathetic skin response (SSR) reflects the function of sudomotor sympathetic unmyelinated fibers. This study evaluates SSR abnormalities in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE). Sympathetic skin response was obtained after electrical stimulation of the glabella recording simultaneously from the hand palm (P), third digit (M3) and fifth digit ipsilateral (U5) and contralateral (cU5) to the side of UNE. Ten consecutive SSRs were recorded from each recording side of all participants. The authors enrolled 31 patients (mean age 54.3 ± 11.4 years) and 25 subjects of a control group (mean age 52.6 ± 11.3 years). The mean of the areas and the area of the largest response of U5-SSR were significantly lower in the patients (106.9 ± 68.9 and 127.8 ± 79.7 μV/s, respectively) than in control group (161.8 ± 116.6 and 197.2 ± 143.3 μV/s, respectively) and in the affected than in the unaffected sides of the patients (155.3 ± 84.8 and 197.7 ± 103.3 μV/s, respectively); there were no differences in U5-SSR latencies and P-SSR and M3-SSR parameters. U5-SSR mean areas and U5-SSR largest area were reduced in 29% and 26% of patients, respectively. The differences between patients and control group and the number of patients with U5-SSR abnormalities increased when the ratios of M3/U5-SSR and U5/cU5-SSR areas were considered. U5-SSR area was related to UNE clinical severity and to some parameters of the ulnar nerve conduction velocity and cutaneous silent period. Sympathetic skin response is useful to demonstrate abnormalities of sympathetic fibers even if UNE patients do not complain for sympathetic symptoms. The SSR abnormalities were evident only if electrophysiological damage of myelinated fibers was moderate or severe.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36730829
doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000963
pii: 00004691-990000000-00053
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Références

Kofler M, Leis AA, Valls-Solé J. Cutaneous silent periods—part 2: update on pathophysiology and clinical utility. Clin Neurophysiol 2019;130:604–615.
Vetrugno R, Liguori R, Cortelli P, Montagna P. Sympathetic skin response: basic mechanisms and clinical applications. Clin Auton Res 2003;13:256–270.
Lefaucheur JP, Wahab A, Planté-Bordeneuve V, et al. Diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy: a comparative study of five neurophysiological tests. Neurophysiol Clin 2015;45:445–455.
Lyu RK, Tang LM, Wu YR, Chen ST. Cardiovascular autonomic function and sympathetic skin response in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2002;26:669–672.
Shahani BT, Day TJ, Cros D, Khalil N, Kneebone CS. RR interval variation and the sympathetic skin response in the assessment of autonomic function in peripheral neuropathy. Arch Neurol 1990;47:659–664.
Soliven B, Maselli R, Jaspan J, et al. Sympathetic skin response in diabetic neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 1997;10:711–716.
Niakan E, Harati Y. Sympathetic skin response in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 1988;11:261–264.
Levy DM, Reid G, Rowley DA, Abraham RR. Quantitative measures of sympathetic skin response in diabetes: relation to sudomotor and neurological function. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;55:902–908.
Idiaquez J, Fadic R, Necochea C. Distal site testing of sympathetic skin response (big toe) in diabetic polyneuropathy. Clin Auton Res 2004;14:401–404.
Caccia MR, Galimberti V, Valla PL, Salvaggio A, Dezuanni E, Mangoni A. Peripheral autonomic involvement in the carpal tunnel syndrome. Acta Neurol Scand 1993;88:47–50.
Kuntzer T. Carpal tunnel syndrome in 100 patients: sensitivity, specificity of multi-neurphysiological procedures and estimation of axonal loss of motor, sensory and sympathetic median nerve fibers. J Neurol Sci 1993;127:221–229.
Kanzato N, Komine Y, Kanaya F, Fukiyama K. Preserved sympathetic skin response at the distal phalanx in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 1993;111:2057–2063.
Reddeppa S, Bulusu K, Chand PR, Jacob PC, Kalappurakkal J, Tharakan J. The sympathetic skin response in carpal tunnel syndrome. Auton Neurosci 2000;84:119–121.
Sener HO, Taşcilar NF, Balaban H, Selçuki D. Sympathetic skin response in carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111:1395–1399.
Verghese J, Galanopoulou AS, Herskovitz S. Autonomic dysfunction in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2000;23:1209–1213.
Mondelli M, Vecchiarelli B, Reale F, Marsili T, Giannini F. Sympathetic skin response before and after surgical release of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2001;24:130–133.
Kiylioglu N, Akyol A, Guney E, Bicerol B, Ozkul A, Erturk A. Sympathetic skin response in idiopathic and diabetic carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2005;108:1–7.
Argyriou AA, Polychronopoulos P, Moutopulou E, Aplada M, Chroni E. The significance of intact sympathetic skin responses in carpal tunnel syndrome. Eur J Neurol 2006;13:455–459.
Bayrak AO, Tilki HE, Coşkun M. Sympathetic skin response and axon count in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Clin Neurophysiol 2007;24:70–75.
Zyluk A, Kosovets L. An assessment of the sympathetic function within the hand in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2010;35:402–408.
Deniz O, Aygül R, Kotan D, et al. The effect of local corticosteroid injection on F-wave conduction velocity and sympathetic skin response in carpal tunnel syndrome. Rheumatol Int 2012;32:1285–1290.
Triki L, Zouari HG, Kammoun R, et al. A reappraisal of small- and large-fiber damage in carpal tunnel syndrome: new insights into the value of the EMLA test for improving diagnostic sensitivity. Neurophysiol Clin 2017;47:427–436.
Kofler M, Fröhlich K, Saltuari L. Preserved cutaneous silent periods in severe entrapment neuropathies. Muscle Nerve 2003;28:711–714.
Mondelli M, Aretini A. Cutaneous silent period in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve 2022;65:225–232.
American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, and American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Campbell WW, Carroll DJ, Greenberg MK, et al. Practice parameter. Electrodiagnostic studies in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Neurology 1999;52:688–690.
Mondelli M, Padua L, Giannini F, Bibbò G, Aprile I, Rossi S. A self-administered questionnaire of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Neurol Sci 2006;27:402–411.
Werner RA, Chiodo T, Spiegelberg T, Franzblau A. Use of hand diagrams in screening for ulnar neuropathy: comparison with elecrodiagnostic studies. Muscle Nerve 2012;46:891–894.
Vinciguerra C, Curti S, Aretini A, et al. Clinical findings and electrodiagnostic testing in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow and differences according to site and type of nerve damage. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2020;99:116–123.
Maselli RA, Jaspan JB, Soliven BC, Green AJ, Spire JP, Arnason BG. Comparison of sympathetic skin response with quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test in diabetic neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 1989;12:420–423.
Mondelli M, Aretini A, Ballerini M, Vecchiarelli B, Rossi A. Sympathetic skin response. Glabella stimulation may be more useful than peripheral nerve stimulation in clinical practice. Auton Neurosci 2011;164:101–104.
Toyokura M, Murakami K. Reproducibility of sympathetic skin response. Muscle Nerve 1996;19:1481–1483.
Toyokura M. Waveform and habituation of sympathetic skin response. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;109:178–183.
Mondelli M, de Stefano R, Rossi S, Aretini A, Romano C. Sympathetic skin response in primary Raynaud's phenomenon. Clin Auton Res 2009;19:355–362.
Montagna P, Liguori R, Zappia M. Sympathetic skin response. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985;48:489–490.
Kira Y, Ogura T, Aramaki S, Kubo T, Hayasida T, Hirasawa Y. Sympathetic skin response evoked by respiratory stimulation as a measure of sympathetic function. Clin Neurophysiol 2001;112: 861–865.
Chroni E, Argyriou AA, Polychronopoulos P, Sirrou V. The effect of stimulation technique on sympathetic skin responses in healthy subjects. Clin Auton Res 2006;16:396–400.
Kucera P, Goldenberg Z, Kurca E. Sympathetic skin response: review of the method and its clinical use. Bratisl Lek Listy 2004;105:108–116.
Illigens BM, Gibbons CH. Sweat testing to evaluate autonomic function. Clin Auton Res 2009;19:79–87.
Dawson DM. Entrapment neuropathies of the upper extremities. N Engl J Med 1993;329:2013–2018.
Linden D, Weng Y, Glocker FX, Kretzschmar A, Diehl RR, Berlit P. Sympathetic skin responses evoked by magnetic stimulation of the neck: normative data. Muscle Nerve 1996;19:1487–1489.

Auteurs

Mauro Mondelli (M)

EMG Service, Local Health Unit Toscana Sud Est, Siena, Italy.

Classifications MeSH