The Impact of the Patient Role on Medical Student Learning During Peer Simulation: A Qualitative Phenomenological Study.
Journal
Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
ISSN: 1559-713X
Titre abrégé: Simul Healthc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101264408
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Oct 2022
24 Oct 2022
Historique:
entrez:
2
2
2023
pubmed:
3
2
2023
medline:
3
2
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Simulation-based learning is an effective approach to teaching and assessing medical students. However, there is a lack of research regarding how playing the patient role during peer simulation impacts medical student learning. This study, therefore, examines the experiences of first-year medical students in the patient role during a high-fidelity, multiday peer simulation. Using a phenomenological approach to qualitative data analysis, we analyzed 175 student reflection papers assigned to the students at the conclusion of the peer simulation. Our research team individually coded each paper and then came to a consensus on themes and patterns within the data. We discovered the following 4 themes within the data: (1) communication, (2) empathy, (3) stress, and (4) professional identity. Through observation and peer simulation students learned the importance of team, patient, and nonverbal communication, especially during transitions of care. Next, the students recognized the importance of quality patient care and prioritizing the humanity of their future patients. The students also connected stress and mistakes, teaching them the importance of stress management. Finally, inspired by their peers and looking to their future selves, the students expressed a commitment to continued professional development. The patient role during peer simulation is an impactful learning experience for first-year medical students. Our study holds important implications for ways in which medical educators can maximize the benefits of simulation-based education for junior medical student learning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36730921
doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000698
pii: 01266021-990000000-00035
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Society for Simulation in Healthcare.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Challa KT, Sayed A, Acharya Y. Modern techniques of teaching and learning in medical education: a descriptive literature review. MedEdPublish 2021;10(18):18.
Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011;306(9):978–988.
Cook DA, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, et al. Comparative effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation versus other instructional methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Simul Healthc 2012;7(5):308–320.
McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, et al. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med 2011;86(6):706–711.
Borggreve AS, Meijer JMR, Schreuder HWR, et al. Simulation-based trauma education for medical students: a review of literature. Med Teach 2017;39(6):631–638.
Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13(suppl 1):i2–i10.
Makransky G, Bonde MT, Wulff JSG, et al. Simulation based virtual learning environment in medical genetics counseling: an example of bridging the gap between theory and practice in medical education. BMC Med Educ 2016;16(1):98.
Lateef F. Simulation-based learning: just like the real thing. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2010;3(4):348–352.
Ertmer PA, Strobel J, Cheng X, et al. Expressions of critical thinking in role-playing simulations: comparisons across roles. J Comput Higher Educ 2010;22(2):73–94.
Jabaay MJ, Marotta DA, Aita SL, et al. Medical simulation-based learning outcomes in pre-clinical medical education. Cureus 2020;12(12):e11875.
Joyner B, Young L. Teaching medical students using role play: twelve tips for successful role plays. Med Teach 2006;28(3):225–229.
Nestel D, Kidd J. Peer assisted learning in patient-centred interviewing: the impact on student tutors. Med Teach 2005;27(5):439–444.
Singh K, Bhattacharyya M, Veerwal V, et al. Using role-plays as an empathy education tool for ophthalmology postgraduate. Int J Appl Basic Med Res 2017;7(Suppl 1):S62–S66.
Shen X, Tay BWR, Tan BY-Q, et al. Effectiveness of near-peer simulation for managing the acutely deteriorating patient among residents of an internal medicine junior residency programme. Singapore Med J 2020;61(1):34–38.
George TP, Gainey KL, Kershner SH, et al. Junior and senior nursing students: a near-peer simulation experience. J Nurs Educ 2020;59(1):54–56.
Cash T, Brand E, Wong E, et al. Near-peer medical student simulation training. Clin Teach 2017;14(3):175–179.
Pritchard SA, Blackstock FC, Nestel D, et al. Simulated patients in physical therapy education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther 2016;96(9):1342–1353.
Rantatalo O, Sjöberg D, Karp S. Supporting roles in live simulations: how observers and confederates can facilitate learning. J Vocat Educ Train 2019;71(3):482–499.
Dalwood N, Bowles KA, Williams C, et al. Students as patients: a systematic review of peer simulation in health care professional education. Med Educ 2020;54(5):387–399.
Creswell JP, CNQualitative Inquiry Research and Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2018.
Van Manen M. Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for Action Sensitive Pedagogy. New York: State University; 1990.
Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Vancouver: Sage; 2002.
Lin AC. Bridging positivist and interpretivist approaches to qualitative methods. Policy Stud J 1998;26(1):162–180.
Nordqvist M, Hall A, Melin L. Qualitative research on family businesses: the relevance and usefulness of the interpretive approach. J Manag Organ 2009;15(3):294–308.
Malacrida C. Reflexive journaling on emotional research topics: ethical issues for team researchers. Qual Health Res 2007;17(10):1329–1339.
Barrett A, Kajamaa A, Johnston J. How to be reflexive when conducting qualitative research. Clin Teach 2020;17(1):9–12.
Barusch AGC, George M. Rigor in qualitative social work research: a review of studies used in published articles. Soc Work Res 2011;35(1):11–19.
Lietz CA, Langer CL, Furman R. Establishing trustworthiness in qualitative research in social work: implications from a study regarding spirituality. Qual Soc Work 2006;5(4):441–458.
O'Regan S, Molloy E, Watterson L, et al. Observer roles that optimise learning in healthcare simulation education: a systematic review. Adv Simul 2016;1(1):4.
Bonnel W, Hober C. Optimizing the reflective observer role in high-fidelity patient simulation. J Nurs Educ 2016;55(6):353–356.
Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and structure of a medical school. Standards for accredidation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree. Available at: https://lcme.org/publications/. Accessed February 15, 2022.
Henry SG, Holmboe ES, Frankel RM. Evidence-based competencies for improving communication skills in graduate medical education: a review with suggestions for implementation. Med Teach 2013;35(5):395–403.
Abraham J, Kannampallil T, Patel VL. A systematic review of the literature on the evaluation of handoff tools: implications for research and practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21(1):154–162.
Starmer AJ, Spector ND, West DC, et al. Integrating research, quality improvement, and medical education for better handoffs and safer care: disseminating, adapting, and implementing the I-PASS program. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2017;43(7):319–329.
Brugel S, Postma-Nilsenová M, Tates K. The link between perception of clinical empathy and nonverbal behavior: the effect of a doctor's gaze and body orientation. Patient Educ Couns 2015;98(10):1260–1265.
Riess H, Kraft-Todd G. E.M.P.A.T.H.Y.: a tool to enhance nonverbal communication between clinicians and their patients. Acad Med 2014;89(8):1108–1112.
Vogel D, Meyer M, Harendza S. Verbal and non-verbal communication skills including empathy during history taking of undergraduate medical students. BMC Med Educ 2018;18(1):157.
Karvelytė M, Rogers J, Gormley GJ. ‘Walking in the shoes of our patients’: a scoping review of healthcare professionals learning from the simulation of patient illness experiences. Adv Simul (Lond) 2021;6(1):43.
Mandrusiak AM, Isles R, Chang AT, et al. Senior physiotherapy students as standardised patients for junior students enhances self-efficacy and satisfaction in both junior and senior students. BMC Med Educ 2014;14(1):105.
Bearman M, Palermo C, Allen LM, et al. Learning empathy through simulation: a systematic literature review. Simul Healthc 2015;10(5):308–319.
Gelis A, Cervello S, Rey R, et al. Peer role-play for training communication skills in medical students: a systematic review. Simul Healthc 2020;15(2):106–111.
Dijkstra FS, Renden PG, Meeter M, et al. Learning about stress from building, drilling and flying: a scoping review on team performance and stress in non-medical fields. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2021;29:52.
Robertson JM, Dias RD, Yule S, et al. Operating room team training with simulation: a systematic review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2017;27(5):475–480.
Wald HS, Anthony D, Hutchinson TA, et al. Professional identity formation in medical education for humanistic, resilient physicians: pedagogic strategies for bridging theory to practice. Acad Med 2015;90(6):753–760.
Feldman ME, Edwards C, Wong A, et al. The role for simulation in professional identity formation in medical students. Simul Healthc 2022;17:e8–e13.
Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. Medicine as a community of practice: implications for medical education. Acad Med 2018;93(2):185–191.
Chandran L, Iuli RJ, Strano-Paul L, et al. Developing “a way of being”: deliberate approaches to professional identity formation in medical education. Acad Psychiatry 2019;43(5):521–527.