Identifying High-Risk Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: An Opportunity for Intervention Within the Primary Care Setting.


Journal

Journal of clinical gastroenterology
ISSN: 1539-2031
Titre abrégé: J Clin Gastroenterol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7910017

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 10 2023
Historique:
received: 04 04 2022
accepted: 18 09 2022
medline: 11 9 2023
pubmed: 3 2 2023
entrez: 2 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS) are likely to have nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which can progress to advanced fibrosis. Early recognition of those at highest risk may ameliorate outcomes. Noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment through validated scoring systems such as the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index is helpful to identify these high-risk patients, with the process ideally beginning in the primary care setting. The primary objective of this study was to determine rates of disease recognition and initial management of patients with NAFLD and advanced fibrosis in a diverse primary care setting. The secondary objective was to define demographic and clinical predictors of NAFLD identification and management in this population. Medical charts from patients seen at three university-based primary care practices in New York City from January 2016 to December 2019 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria consisted of: age 18 years and above, persistent alanine transaminase (ALT) elevation (2 values ≥40 IU/mL ≥6 mo apart), and body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 . Patients with viral hepatitis or alcohol misuse were excluded. Patients were defined as likely having NAFLD if they met 2 of the following criteria indicating MetS: systolic blood pressure >135 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure >85 mm Hg or active treatment for hypertension; high-density lipoprotein <40 g/dL; triglycerides >150 mg/dL or active treatment for hyperlipidemia; or hemoglobin A1c ≥5.7% or active treatment for insulin resistance. The primary study endpoints were the frequency of providers' recognition of NAFLD and referral to specialist and/or for imaging based on visit diagnosis codes or chart documentation. The secondary endpoints were frequency of detecting those with NAFLD and advanced fibrosis utilizing previously defined FIB-4 index cutoffs as well as predictors of disease recognition and management. Analysis was completed using descriptive statistics and logistical regression modeling. A total of 295 patients were identified as having persistently elevated ALT, a body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 , and MetS consistent with likely NAFLD diagnosis. In patients meeting these criteria, ALT elevation was documented by primary care providers in 129 patients (43.7%), NAFLD was noted in chart documentation in 76 patients (25.8%), and a NAFLD ICD-10 diagnosis was assigned to 7 patients (2.4%). 50 patients (16.9%) were referred for ultrasound. Among 51 patients (17.2%) at high risk for advanced fibrosis based on FIB-4 >3.25, 23 patients (45.1%) had NAFLD recognized by their provider and 3 (5.9%) were referred to a specialist. On logistic regression, female gender, dyslipidemia, and private insurance were predictors of disease identification by the primary care physician. ALT elevation and NAFLD are under recognized among patients with MetS in the primary care setting. Importantly, while 17.2% of patients with likely NAFLD in our cohort were high risk for advanced fibrosis, less than half of this group had a NAFLD diagnosis recognized by their primary care provider and only three were referred to a liver specialist. Further investigation of disease recognition and management algorithms in the primary care setting are necessary to enhance NAFLD detection, implement clinical care pathways, and reduce disease progression and complications.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE
Patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS) are likely to have nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which can progress to advanced fibrosis. Early recognition of those at highest risk may ameliorate outcomes. Noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment through validated scoring systems such as the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index is helpful to identify these high-risk patients, with the process ideally beginning in the primary care setting. The primary objective of this study was to determine rates of disease recognition and initial management of patients with NAFLD and advanced fibrosis in a diverse primary care setting. The secondary objective was to define demographic and clinical predictors of NAFLD identification and management in this population.
METHODS
Medical charts from patients seen at three university-based primary care practices in New York City from January 2016 to December 2019 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria consisted of: age 18 years and above, persistent alanine transaminase (ALT) elevation (2 values ≥40 IU/mL ≥6 mo apart), and body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 . Patients with viral hepatitis or alcohol misuse were excluded. Patients were defined as likely having NAFLD if they met 2 of the following criteria indicating MetS: systolic blood pressure >135 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure >85 mm Hg or active treatment for hypertension; high-density lipoprotein <40 g/dL; triglycerides >150 mg/dL or active treatment for hyperlipidemia; or hemoglobin A1c ≥5.7% or active treatment for insulin resistance. The primary study endpoints were the frequency of providers' recognition of NAFLD and referral to specialist and/or for imaging based on visit diagnosis codes or chart documentation. The secondary endpoints were frequency of detecting those with NAFLD and advanced fibrosis utilizing previously defined FIB-4 index cutoffs as well as predictors of disease recognition and management. Analysis was completed using descriptive statistics and logistical regression modeling.
RESULTS
A total of 295 patients were identified as having persistently elevated ALT, a body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 , and MetS consistent with likely NAFLD diagnosis. In patients meeting these criteria, ALT elevation was documented by primary care providers in 129 patients (43.7%), NAFLD was noted in chart documentation in 76 patients (25.8%), and a NAFLD ICD-10 diagnosis was assigned to 7 patients (2.4%). 50 patients (16.9%) were referred for ultrasound. Among 51 patients (17.2%) at high risk for advanced fibrosis based on FIB-4 >3.25, 23 patients (45.1%) had NAFLD recognized by their provider and 3 (5.9%) were referred to a specialist. On logistic regression, female gender, dyslipidemia, and private insurance were predictors of disease identification by the primary care physician.
CONCLUSION
ALT elevation and NAFLD are under recognized among patients with MetS in the primary care setting. Importantly, while 17.2% of patients with likely NAFLD in our cohort were high risk for advanced fibrosis, less than half of this group had a NAFLD diagnosis recognized by their primary care provider and only three were referred to a liver specialist. Further investigation of disease recognition and management algorithms in the primary care setting are necessary to enhance NAFLD detection, implement clinical care pathways, and reduce disease progression and complications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36731002
doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001784
pii: 00004836-990000000-00080
doi:

Substances chimiques

Alanine Transaminase EC 2.6.1.2

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

956-961

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Younossi Z, Anstee QM, Marietti M, et al. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15:11–20.
Anstee QM, Targher G, Day CP. Progression of NAFLD to diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease or cirrhosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10:330–344.
Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, et al. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease—meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64:73–84.
Hagström H, Nasr P, Ekstedt M, et al. Fibrosis stage but not NASH predicts mortality and time to development of severe liver disease in biopsy-proven NAFLD. J Hepatol. 2017;67:1265–1273.
Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;67:328–357.
Blais P, Husain N, Kramer JR, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is underrecognized in the primary care setting. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:10–14.
Kanwal F, Shubrook JH, Adams LA, et al. Clinical care pathway for the risk stratification and management of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2021;161:1657–1669.
Sun W, Cui H, Li N, et al. Comparison of FIB‐4 index, NAFLD fibrosis score and BARD score for prediction of advanced fibrosis in adult patients with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta‐analysis study. Hepatol Res. 2016;46:862–870.
Tapper EB, Hunink MGM, Afdhal NH, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis: risk stratification of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) by the primary care physician using the NAFLD Fibrosis Score. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0147237.
Elangovan H, Rajagopaul S, Williams SM, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: interface between primary care and hepatology clinics. Hepatol Commun. 2020;4:518–526.
Grundy SM, Brewer HB Jr, Cleeman JI, et al. American Heart Association; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Definition of metabolic syndrome: report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association conference on scientific issues related to definition. Circulation. 2004;109:433–438.
Crabb DW, Im GY, Szabo G, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Alcohol-Associated Liver Diseases: 2019 Practice Guidance From the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2020;71:306–333.
Vallet-Pichard A, Mallet V, Nalpas B, et al. FIB-4: an inexpensive and accurate marker of fibrosis in HCV infection comparison with liver biopsy and fibrotest. Hepatology. 2007;46:32–36.
Kanwal F, Kramer JR, Li L, et al. Effect of metabolic traits on the risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2020;71:808–819.
Lonardo A, Nascimbeni F, Ballestri S, et al. Sex differences in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: state of the art and identification of research gaps. Hepatology. 2019;70:1457–1469.
Stewart M. Patient characteristics which are related to the doctor-patient interaction. Fam Pract. 1984;1:30–36.
Rich NE, Oji S, Mufti AR, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease prevalence, severity, and outcomes in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:198–210.e2.
Chalasani N, Saha C, Teal E. Are there ethnicity-based differences in the evaluation of individuals with abnormal liver biochemistries? J Hepatol. 2007;47:123–127.
Parry DA. The molecular and fibrillar structure of collagen and its relationship to the mechanical properties of connective tissue. Biophys Chem. 1988;29:195–209.
Loomis AK, Kabadi S, Preiss D, et al. Body mass index and risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: two electronic health record prospective studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101:945–952.
Kim Y, Chang Y, Cho YK, et al. Metabolically healthy versus unhealthy obesity and risk of fibrosis progression in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2019;39:1884–1894.

Auteurs

Jae Seong No (JS)

Weill Cornell Medicine.

Adam Buckholz (A)

Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York, NY.

Catherine Han (C)

Weill Cornell Medicine.

Steven Matthews (S)

Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York, NY.

Brett Fortune (B)

Montefiore Health System, Bronx, NY.

Tibor Krisko (T)

Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York, NY.

Carolyn Newberry (C)

Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York, NY.

Sonal Kumar (S)

Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York, NY.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH