Indications for continuous electroencephalographic (cEEG) monitoring: What do they tell us?
Continuous EEG
Indication for EEG
Non-convulsive seizures
Subclinical seizures
Journal
Epilepsy research
ISSN: 1872-6844
Titre abrégé: Epilepsy Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8703089
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2023
02 2023
Historique:
received:
03
10
2022
revised:
27
12
2022
accepted:
12
01
2023
pubmed:
3
2
2023
medline:
22
2
2023
entrez:
2
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
While studies have explored clinical and EEG predictors of seizures on continuous EEG (cEEG), the role of cEEG indications as predictors of seizures has not been studied. Our study aims to fill this knowledge gap. We used the prospective cEEG database at Cleveland Clinic for the 2016 calendar year. Patients ≥ 18 years who underwent cEEG for the indication of altered mental status (AMS) and seizure-like events (SLE: motor or patient-reported events) were included. Baseline characteristics and EEG findings were compared between the two groups. Multivariable regression was used to compare the two groups and identify seizure detection risk factors. Of 2227 patients (mean age 59.4 years) who met the inclusion criteria, 882 (50% females) underwent cEEG for AMS and 1345(51% females) for SLE. SLE patients were younger(OR: 0.988, CI: 0.98-0.99, p < 0.001), had longer monitoring(OR:1.04, CI:1.00-1.07, p = 0.033), were more likely to have epilepsy-related-breakthrough seizures(OR:25.9, CI:0.5.89-115, p < 0.001), psychogenic non-epileptic spells (OR:6.85, CI:1.60-29.3, p = 0.008), were more awake (p < 0.001) and more likely to be on anti-seizure medications(OR:1.60, CI:1.29-1.98, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, SLE was an independent predictor of seizure detection (OR: 2.60, CI: 1.77-3.88, p < 0.001). Our findings highlight the differences in patients undergoing cEEG for AMS vs. SLE. SLE as a cEEG indication represents an independent predictor of seizures on cEEG and, therefore, deserves special attention. Future multicenter studies are needed to validate our findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36731271
pii: S0920-1211(23)00013-X
doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2023.107088
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
107088Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interests All other authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this study. We confirm that we have read the Journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publications and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.