Strangulation in sexual homicide: Is it opportunity, victim's vulnerability or sadism?

Artificial neural network Opportunity Sadism Sexual homicide Strangulation Victim's vulnerability

Journal

Journal of forensic and legal medicine
ISSN: 1878-7487
Titre abrégé: J Forensic Leg Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300022

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 07 10 2022
revised: 10 01 2023
accepted: 20 01 2023
pubmed: 3 2 2023
medline: 15 2 2023
entrez: 2 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although most homicides involve the use of a weapon, some offenders still prefer killing with their own hands, using strangulation. In fact, when disaggregating the various types of homicides, sexual homicide offenders appear as having a preference for "personal weapon" to kill the victim. Personal weapons, such as strangulation, asphyxiation, and beating, are the most commonly used killing methods in sexual homicide. Using a sample of 451 cases of sexual homicide of adult female, the current study examines three hypotheses as to why strangulation is the method of choice to kill in sexual homicide: 1) weapon of opportunity, 2) victim's vulnerability, and 3) sexual sadism. Results from logistic regressions and artificial neural network analysis show that all three hypotheses are supported, sexual homicide offenders using strangulation being less likely to target a victim with a strong build, to bring and use a weapon. However, strangulation is more likely to be used to kill the victim when the offender is characterized with sadism. Implications of the findings are discussed in light of our understanding of the crime-commission process involved in sexual homicide.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36731365
pii: S1752-928X(23)00006-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2023.102488
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102488

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None.

Auteurs

Anny Kim (A)

School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby (British Columbia), V5A 1S6, Canada. Electronic address: anny_kim@sfu.ca.

Eric Beauregard (E)

School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby (British Columbia), V5A 1S6, Canada. Electronic address: ebeaureg@sfu.ca.

Julien Chopin (J)

Terrorism, Violence and Security Institute Research Centre, Simon Fraser University and International Centre for Comparative Criminology, University of Montreal, Canada. Electronic address: julien_chopin@sfu.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH