Physician altruism under the change from pure payment system to mixed payment schemes: experimental evidence.
Altruism
Diagnosis-related groups
Fee-for-service
Laboratory experiment
Mixed payment schemes
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Feb 2023
02 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
22
10
2022
accepted:
25
01
2023
entrez:
2
2
2023
pubmed:
3
2
2023
medline:
7
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mixed payment schemes have become one of the effective measures to balance medical costs and quality of medical services. However, altruism as an intrinsic motivation may influence the effect of switching from a pure payment system to mixed payment schemes. This study aimed to quantify physicians' altruism and analyze the effect of changes of payment system on physicians' altruism and thus proposed references for the reform of payment system. We simulated an exogenous payment system in a controlled laboratory with five experimental groups and 150 medical student subjects. Physicians' altruism was measured by estimating altruistic parameter and marginal rate of substitution. The non-parametric test and the least square regression analysis were used to analyze the differences of altruistic parameters between pure payment systems and mixed payment schemes. Finally, we analyzed the effect of changes in payment system accompanied by changes in trade-off range on physicians' altruism. We find that the mean value of individual altruistic parameter is 0.78 and the marginal rate of substitution is 1.078. Their estimates at the individual level were significantly positively correlated (Spearman's ρ = 0.715, p < 0.01). The shift from pure payment system to mixed payment scheme reduced the altruistic parameter. However, the altruistic parameter increased with the increase of the trade-off range. Physicians who were more altruistic generated higher patients' health benefit. For each unit increase in altruistic parameter, the increase in patients' health benefit was lower in mixed payment scheme than in the pure payment system. The estimates of altruistic parameters are reliable. Physicians attach a higher weight to patients' benefit than to their own profit. Mixed payment schemes improve physicians' behavior and relate to lower altruistic parameters; physicians only need to sacrifice less personal profits to generate the same or even higher altruistic parameter as under the pure payment system. The design of mixed payment schemes that make the interests of physicians and patients close to each other by reducing the trade-off range can provide implication for the reform of payment system in which the physicians' interest and the patients' benefit are consistent.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Mixed payment schemes have become one of the effective measures to balance medical costs and quality of medical services. However, altruism as an intrinsic motivation may influence the effect of switching from a pure payment system to mixed payment schemes. This study aimed to quantify physicians' altruism and analyze the effect of changes of payment system on physicians' altruism and thus proposed references for the reform of payment system.
METHODS
METHODS
We simulated an exogenous payment system in a controlled laboratory with five experimental groups and 150 medical student subjects. Physicians' altruism was measured by estimating altruistic parameter and marginal rate of substitution. The non-parametric test and the least square regression analysis were used to analyze the differences of altruistic parameters between pure payment systems and mixed payment schemes. Finally, we analyzed the effect of changes in payment system accompanied by changes in trade-off range on physicians' altruism.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We find that the mean value of individual altruistic parameter is 0.78 and the marginal rate of substitution is 1.078. Their estimates at the individual level were significantly positively correlated (Spearman's ρ = 0.715, p < 0.01). The shift from pure payment system to mixed payment scheme reduced the altruistic parameter. However, the altruistic parameter increased with the increase of the trade-off range. Physicians who were more altruistic generated higher patients' health benefit. For each unit increase in altruistic parameter, the increase in patients' health benefit was lower in mixed payment scheme than in the pure payment system.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The estimates of altruistic parameters are reliable. Physicians attach a higher weight to patients' benefit than to their own profit. Mixed payment schemes improve physicians' behavior and relate to lower altruistic parameters; physicians only need to sacrifice less personal profits to generate the same or even higher altruistic parameter as under the pure payment system. The design of mixed payment schemes that make the interests of physicians and patients close to each other by reducing the trade-off range can provide implication for the reform of payment system in which the physicians' interest and the patients' benefit are consistent.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36732745
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09112-4
pii: 10.1186/s12913-023-09112-4
pmc: PMC9893586
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
111Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 71774113
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Health Econ. 2005 Jan;24(1):211-23
pubmed: 15617795
BMJ. 2002 Mar 16;324(7338):624-5
pubmed: 11895808
J Health Econ. 1990;9(4):375-96
pubmed: 10109988
J Health Econ. 2005 Jan;24(1):73-93
pubmed: 15617789
Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;108:156-65
pubmed: 24641880
J Health Econ. 2013 Dec;32(6):1105-16
pubmed: 24135614
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 28;114(48):E10291-E10300
pubmed: 29146826
J Health Econ. 2018 Jul;60:16-29
pubmed: 29843017
J Health Econ. 2008 Dec;27(6):1436-50
pubmed: 18778862
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):870
pubmed: 35790981
J Health Econ. 1998 Jan;17(1):1-19
pubmed: 10176310
Health Serv Res. 2004 Oct;39(5):1589-606
pubmed: 15333124
Health Econ. 2015 Jul;24(7):895-906
pubmed: 24990110
Health Econ. 2013 Dec;22(12):1417-39
pubmed: 23203722
J Health Econ. 2011 Jul;30(4):637-46
pubmed: 21683460
Psychol Bull. 1999 Nov;125(6):627-68; discussion 692-700
pubmed: 10589297
Health Econ. 2020 Nov;29(11):1435-1455
pubmed: 32812685
J Health Econ. 1986 Jun;5(2):129-51
pubmed: 10287223
J Health Econ. 2018 Nov;62:45-59
pubmed: 30273781
Health Econ. 2017 Feb;26(2):243-262
pubmed: 26708170
J Health Econ. 2011 Sep;30(5):880-93
pubmed: 21782263