Semi-field evaluation of the space spray efficacy of Fludora Co-Max EW against wild insecticide-resistant Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito populations from Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Aedes aegypti
Arboviruses
Culex quinquefasciatus
Côte d’Ivoire
Fludora Co-Max EW
Insecticide resistance
K-Othrine EC
Space spray
Vector control
Journal
Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Feb 2023
02 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
27
05
2022
accepted:
02
11
2022
entrez:
3
2
2023
pubmed:
4
2
2023
medline:
7
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Space spraying of insecticides is still an important means of controlling Aedes and Culex mosquitoes and arboviral diseases. This study evaluated the space spray efficacy of Fludora Co-Max EW, (water-based insecticide space spray combining flupyradifurone and transfluthrin with film forming aqueous spray technology (FFAST)), against wild insecticide-resistant Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes from Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, compared with K-Othrine EC (deltamethrin-only product), in small-scale field trials. Wild Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquito larvae were collected in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire from August to December 2020. Mosquito larvae were reared in the laboratory until the adult stage. Fludora Co-Max EW and K-Othrine EC were tested against emerged adult females (F Overall, Fludora Co-Max EW induced significantly higher knockdown and mortality effects in the wild insecticide-resistant Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus compared with K-Othrine EC. In both species, mortality rates with Fludora Co-Max EW were > 80% (up to 100%) with the ULV spray outdoors at each distance checkpoint (i.e. 10-100 m), and 100% with the ULV and TF sprays indoors at all checkpoints (i.e. ceiling, mid-height and floor). K-Othrine EC induced high mortality indoors (97.9-100%), whereas mortality outdoors rapidly declined in Ae. aegypti from 96.7% (10 m) to 36.7% (100 m) with the ULV spray, and from 85.0% (10 m) to 38.3% (100 m) with the TF spray. Fludora Co-Max EW spray applied as ULV spray outdoors had higher knockdown and higher killing effects on Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus than when applied as TF spray. Fludora Co-Max EW performed better against Cx. quinquefasciatus than against Ae. aegypti. Fludora Co-Max EW induced high mortality and knockdown effects against wild insecticide-resistant Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus Abidjan strains and performed better than K-Othrine EC. The presence of flupyradifurone and transfluthrin (with new and independent modes of action) and FFAST technology in the current Fludora Co-Max EW formulation appears to have broadened its killing capacity. Fludora Co-Max EW is thus an effective adulticide and may be a useful tool for Aedes and Culex mosquito and arbovirus control in endemic areas.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Space spraying of insecticides is still an important means of controlling Aedes and Culex mosquitoes and arboviral diseases. This study evaluated the space spray efficacy of Fludora Co-Max EW, (water-based insecticide space spray combining flupyradifurone and transfluthrin with film forming aqueous spray technology (FFAST)), against wild insecticide-resistant Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes from Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, compared with K-Othrine EC (deltamethrin-only product), in small-scale field trials.
METHODS
METHODS
Wild Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquito larvae were collected in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire from August to December 2020. Mosquito larvae were reared in the laboratory until the adult stage. Fludora Co-Max EW and K-Othrine EC were tested against emerged adult females (F
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, Fludora Co-Max EW induced significantly higher knockdown and mortality effects in the wild insecticide-resistant Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus compared with K-Othrine EC. In both species, mortality rates with Fludora Co-Max EW were > 80% (up to 100%) with the ULV spray outdoors at each distance checkpoint (i.e. 10-100 m), and 100% with the ULV and TF sprays indoors at all checkpoints (i.e. ceiling, mid-height and floor). K-Othrine EC induced high mortality indoors (97.9-100%), whereas mortality outdoors rapidly declined in Ae. aegypti from 96.7% (10 m) to 36.7% (100 m) with the ULV spray, and from 85.0% (10 m) to 38.3% (100 m) with the TF spray. Fludora Co-Max EW spray applied as ULV spray outdoors had higher knockdown and higher killing effects on Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus than when applied as TF spray. Fludora Co-Max EW performed better against Cx. quinquefasciatus than against Ae. aegypti.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Fludora Co-Max EW induced high mortality and knockdown effects against wild insecticide-resistant Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus Abidjan strains and performed better than K-Othrine EC. The presence of flupyradifurone and transfluthrin (with new and independent modes of action) and FFAST technology in the current Fludora Co-Max EW formulation appears to have broadened its killing capacity. Fludora Co-Max EW is thus an effective adulticide and may be a useful tool for Aedes and Culex mosquito and arbovirus control in endemic areas.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36732832
doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05572-5
pii: 10.1186/s13071-022-05572-5
pmc: PMC9893543
doi:
Substances chimiques
Insecticides
0
flupyradifurone
8H7JT159D0
transfluthrin
QWL3SKA6EG
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
47Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2012 Dec;28(4):338-40
pubmed: 23393762
Parasit Vectors. 2016 Sep 29;9(1):523
pubmed: 27682270
Pest Manag Sci. 2015 Jun;71(6):850-62
pubmed: 25351824
Parasit Vectors. 2019 Jul 3;12(1):331
pubmed: 31269996
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Oct;17(10):1274-80
pubmed: 22906100
Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2012 Aug;105(3):230-6
pubmed: 22638774
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jul 20;11(7):e0005625
pubmed: 28727779
Nat Microbiol. 2019 May;4(5):854-863
pubmed: 30833735
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 28;15(2):
pubmed: 29382107
Vaccine. 2020 May 19;38(24):3989-3994
pubmed: 32336601
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Jan 9;11(1):29
pubmed: 29316963
Acta Trop. 2017 Jan;165:66-75
pubmed: 26899680
Trop Med Health. 2019 Jan 04;47:2
pubmed: 30787670
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jun 15;10(6):e0004780
pubmed: 27304430
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Apr 06;12(4):e0006378
pubmed: 29624581
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2020 Sep 1;36(3):189-196
pubmed: 33600591
J Med Entomol. 2021 Jul 16;58(4):1808-1816
pubmed: 33876233
Viruses. 2021 May 12;13(5):
pubmed: 34065928
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2017 Jun;33(2):116-127
pubmed: 28590217
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jul 13;11(7):e0005751
pubmed: 28704434
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Oct 10;13(10):e0007615
pubmed: 31600206
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Jun;5(6):e1202
pubmed: 21713017
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2013 Jun;29(2):173-6
pubmed: 23923334
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 May 5;15(5):e0009397
pubmed: 33951038
J Med Entomol. 2014 Jul;51(4):845-54
pubmed: 25118418
Pest Manag Sci. 2021 Jun;77(6):2609-2619
pubmed: 33421293
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012 Apr;12(4):325-9
pubmed: 22029425
Acta Trop. 2020 Sep;209:105468
pubmed: 32416077
Parasit Vectors. 2016 Nov 23;9(1):597
pubmed: 27881181
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Jul 23;12(7):e0006627
pubmed: 30036382
Annu Rev Entomol. 2020 Jan 7;65:191-208
pubmed: 31594415