Assessment of atrial conduction times in patients with frequent premature ventricular complex.

atrial conduction time echocardiography premature ventricular complex

Journal

Journal of arrhythmia
ISSN: 1880-4276
Titre abrégé: J Arrhythm
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101263026

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 07 06 2022
revised: 14 12 2022
accepted: 22 12 2022
entrez: 3 2 2023
pubmed: 4 2 2023
medline: 4 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Premature ventricular complex (PVC) is a frequent finding in the general population. The atrial conduction time (ACT) is the period between the electrocardiographic P wave and the atrial mechanical contraction, and its prolongation indicates an atrial electromechanical delay (EMD). In our study, we compared atrial conduction parameters by echocardiographic methods between patients with frequent PVC and healthy control subjects. The study included 54 patients with PVC and 54 healthy volunteers. Atrial conduction parameters were measured with echocardiographic examination. The time difference between the p wave and the Am wave was measured in the septal, lateral, and tricuspid annulus regions. The interatrial EMD, left atrial intra-atrial delay, and the right atrial intra-atrial delay were calculated from these measurements. The groups were compared for demographic and electrocardiographic features and echocardiographic parameters. Left intra-atrial EMD, right intra-atrial EMD, and interatrial EMD were significantly longer in the patient group ( Atrial conduction times are prolonged in patients with frequent PVC.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Premature ventricular complex (PVC) is a frequent finding in the general population. The atrial conduction time (ACT) is the period between the electrocardiographic P wave and the atrial mechanical contraction, and its prolongation indicates an atrial electromechanical delay (EMD). In our study, we compared atrial conduction parameters by echocardiographic methods between patients with frequent PVC and healthy control subjects.
Methods UNASSIGNED
The study included 54 patients with PVC and 54 healthy volunteers. Atrial conduction parameters were measured with echocardiographic examination. The time difference between the p wave and the Am wave was measured in the septal, lateral, and tricuspid annulus regions. The interatrial EMD, left atrial intra-atrial delay, and the right atrial intra-atrial delay were calculated from these measurements. The groups were compared for demographic and electrocardiographic features and echocardiographic parameters.
Results UNASSIGNED
Left intra-atrial EMD, right intra-atrial EMD, and interatrial EMD were significantly longer in the patient group (
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Atrial conduction times are prolonged in patients with frequent PVC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36733324
doi: 10.1002/joa3.12806
pii: JOA312806
pmc: PMC9885309
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

34-41

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Heart Rhythm Society.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The work will be presented at the “European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress 2022, Barcelona” as an oral moderated poster presentation and will be published as an abstract in the supplement of the European Heart Journal.

Références

J Cardiol. 2015 Nov;66(5):382-7
pubmed: 25818642
Europace. 2019 May 1;21(5):698-707
pubmed: 30508087
Echocardiography. 2014 Sep;31(8):972-9
pubmed: 24447113
J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Oct;1(5):e002519
pubmed: 23316293
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Dec;18(12):1440-63
pubmed: 16376782
Clin Cardiol. 2008 Feb;31(2):74-8
pubmed: 18257022
Heart Rhythm. 2007 Feb;4(2):175-85
pubmed: 17275753
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Jan;30 Suppl 1:S147-50
pubmed: 17302693
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2020 May;25(3):e12718
pubmed: 31603280
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011 Jul;22(7):791-8
pubmed: 21332870
Heart. 2009 May;95(10):835-40
pubmed: 19074923
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;112(8):1263-70
pubmed: 23927786
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Nov;37(11):1455-61
pubmed: 25039981
Kardiol Pol. 2014;72(11):1141-7
pubmed: 25522754
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 15;11(1):1601
pubmed: 33452389
Med Princ Pract. 2015;24(1):30-5
pubmed: 25138738
Hypertension. 2007 Feb;49(2):311-6
pubmed: 17178978
Heart. 2011 Dec;97(23):1982-9
pubmed: 22058287
Stroke. 2015 May;46(5):1365-7
pubmed: 25873602
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Feb 1;180:80-5
pubmed: 25438221
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Mar;42(3):321-326
pubmed: 30653680
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 2;72(14):e91-e220
pubmed: 29097296
Circulation. 2020 Apr 28;141(17):1404-1418
pubmed: 32339046
Echocardiography. 2016 Jul;33(7):970-6
pubmed: 27009549
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2020 Jun 22;18(1):22
pubmed: 32571347

Auteurs

Erkan Kahraman (E)

Department of Cardiology, Dr. Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital University of Health Sciences Istanbul Turkey.

Nursen Keles (N)

Department of Cardiology, Dr. Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital University of Health Sciences Istanbul Turkey.

Kemal Emrecan Parsova (KE)

Department of Cardiology Zile State Hospital Tokat Turkey.

Murat Bastopcu (M)

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Dr. Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital University of Health Sciences Istanbul Turkey.

Mesut Karatas (M)

Department of Cardiology, Kartal Kosuyolu Yüksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital University of Health Sciences Istanbul Turkey.

Classifications MeSH