Reliability assessment of ultrasound muscle echogenicity in patients with rheumatic diseases: Results of a multicenter international web-based study.
muscle echogenicity
musculoskeletal ultrasound
reliability
rheumatic diseases
sarcopenia
Journal
Frontiers in medicine
ISSN: 2296-858X
Titre abrégé: Front Med (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648047
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
05
11
2022
accepted:
29
12
2022
entrez:
3
2
2023
pubmed:
4
2
2023
medline:
4
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To investigate the inter/intra-reliability of ultrasound (US) muscle echogenicity in patients with rheumatic diseases. Forty-two rheumatologists and 2 radiologists from 13 countries were asked to assess US muscle echogenicity of quadriceps muscle in 80 static images and 20 clips from 64 patients with different rheumatic diseases and 8 healthy subjects. Two visual scales were evaluated, a visual semi-quantitative scale (0-3) and a continuous quantitative measurement ("VAS echogenicity," 0-100). The same assessment was repeated to calculate intra-observer reliability. US muscle echogenicity was also calculated by an independent research assistant using a software for the analysis of scientific images (ImageJ). Inter and intra reliabilities were assessed by means of prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted Kappa (PABAK), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and correlations through Kendall's Tau and Pearson's Rho coefficients. The semi-quantitative scale showed a moderate inter-reliability [PABAK = 0.58 (0.57-0.59)] and a substantial intra-reliability [PABAK = 0.71 (0.68-0.73)]. The lowest inter and intra-reliability results were obtained for the intermediate grades (i.e., grade 1 and 2) of the semi-quantitative scale. "VAS echogenicity" showed a high reliability both in the inter-observer [ICC = 0.80 (0.75-0.85)] and intra-observer [ICC = 0.88 (0.88-0.89)] evaluations. A substantial association was found between the participants assessment of the semi-quantitative scale and "VAS echogenicity" [ICC = 0.52 (0.50-0.54)]. The correlation between these two visual scales and ImageJ analysis was high (tau = 0.76 and rho = 0.89, respectively). The results of this large, multicenter study highlighted the overall good inter and intra-reliability of the US assessment of muscle echogenicity in patients with different rheumatic diseases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36733934
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1090468
pmc: PMC9886677
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1090468Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Di Matteo, Moscioni, Lommano, Cipolletta, Smerilli, Farah, Airoldi, Aydin, Becciolini, Bonfiglioli, Carotti, Carrara, Cazenave, Corradini, Cosatti, de Agustin, Destro Castaniti, Di Carlo, Di Donato, Di Geso, Elliott, Fodor, Francioso, Gabba, Hernández-Díaz, Horvath, Hurnakova, Jesus, Marin, Martire, Mashadi Mirza, Massarotti, Musca, Nair, Okano, Papalopoulos, Rosa, Rosemffet, Rovisco, Rozza, Salaffi, Scioscia, Scirè, Tamas, Tanimura, Ventura-Rios, Villota-Eraso, Villota, Voulgari, Vreju, Vukatana, Hereter, Zanetti, Grassi and Filippucci.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
SA received honoraria from AbbVie, Celgene, UCB, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, and Sanofi. AB served as a speaker for AbbVie, Amgen, Sanofi-Genzyme, and UCB, outside the submitted work. EF had received speaking fees from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, and UCB, outside the submitted work. WG had received speaking fees from Celltrion and Pfizer, outside the submitted work.
Références
Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Jul 28;6:192
pubmed: 25120482
Eur Geriatr Med. 2021 Feb;12(1):45-59
pubmed: 33387359
Eur Geriatr Med. 2018 Dec;9(6):739-757
pubmed: 34674473
BMC Med Imaging. 2012 Apr 02;12:7
pubmed: 22471726
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Oct;13(5):2298-2309
pubmed: 35851996
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Nov 28;61(12):4775-4785
pubmed: 35333315
Muscle Nerve. 2021 Apr;63(4):455-466
pubmed: 33051891
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Sep;47(9):3205-3216
pubmed: 34687326
Neurol Res. 2011 Dec;33(10):1016-24
pubmed: 22196753
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020 Sep-Oct;38(5):985-988
pubmed: 32301420
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 26;10(23):
pubmed: 34884255
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 07;21(16):
pubmed: 32784808
Nutrition. 2021 Apr;84:110999
pubmed: 33160811
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018 Apr;9(2):269-278
pubmed: 29349935
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Mar;21(3):300-307.e2
pubmed: 32033882
Eur Radiol. 2020 Apr;30(4):2199-2208
pubmed: 31834509
Radiol Med. 2022 Mar;127(3):228-237
pubmed: 35041137
Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Aug;32(8):1155-60
pubmed: 23588880
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021 Jun;51(3):661-676
pubmed: 33386164
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2020 Sep 28;22(11):82
pubmed: 32989482
Radiol Med. 2022 Nov;127(11):1277-1291
pubmed: 36125609
J Pediatr. 1982 Nov;101(5):656-60
pubmed: 7131136
J Anat. 2001 Oct;199(Pt 4):429-34
pubmed: 11693303
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Feb;41(2):557-64
pubmed: 25444689
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;18(4):290-300
pubmed: 28202349
Age Ageing. 2019 Jan 1;48(1):16-31
pubmed: 30312372
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Nov;33(11):2929-2939
pubmed: 33566325
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 11;10(1):19551
pubmed: 33177536
Biometrics. 1977 Jun;33(2):363-74
pubmed: 884196
Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Mar;40(3):1055-1060
pubmed: 33040227
J Biomech. 2009 Nov 13;42(15):2549-54
pubmed: 19646698
Mod Rheumatol. 2022 Jul 1;32(4):728-735
pubmed: 34897497
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Nov 28;61(12):4863-4874
pubmed: 35293988
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):116-8
pubmed: 14639480
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2022 May 21;:
pubmed: 35596881
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2022 Dec;57:152090
pubmed: 36099743