Elevating the patient voice in contraceptive care quality improvement: A qualitative study of patient preferences for peripartum contraceptive care.


Journal

Contraception
ISSN: 1879-0518
Titre abrégé: Contraception
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0234361

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2023
Historique:
received: 27 04 2022
revised: 13 01 2023
accepted: 22 01 2023
medline: 5 5 2023
pubmed: 4 2 2023
entrez: 3 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patient-centeredness is an important indicator of peripartum contraceptive care quality. Prior work demonstrates how care fragmentation, provider biases, and other factors sometimes undermine the patient-centeredness and quality of this care. To guide the design of future quality improvement interventions, we explored patient preferences for peripartum contraceptive care. For this qualitative study, we recruited a convenience sample of individuals receiving prenatal care at the study site and participating in an online survey about their experience of peripartum contraceptive care during February-July 2020. We conducted individual, in-depth, semistructured interviews to assess patients' preferences for peripartum contraceptive care. Using inductive and deductive qualitative content analysis, we evaluated interview data for patient preferences for peripartum contraceptive counseling and organized preferences into domains to inform future quality measurement. Interviews (lasting 7-26 min) included 21 postpartum individuals, who were largely White with high levels of formal education. Many participants described suboptimal care experiences characterized by insufficient information, inadequate centering of patient values, and, occasionally, disrespectful care. We identified four key themes describing patients' desire for (1) comprehensive, anticipatory information from one's peripartum provider; (2) counseling and decision-making that (a) prioritize patient preferences and values and (b) avoid pressure; (3) care that respects patient feelings and wishes; and (4) provider responsiveness to individual patient preferences regarding timing and frequency of counseling. We newly identify four key domains of patient preferences for peripartum contraceptive care. Additional research is needed to understand peripartum contraceptive care preferences among diverse patient populations. Future research should develop validated measures for evaluating the patient experience of peripartum contraceptive care at scale, as part of ongoing efforts to improve the quality and respectfulness of peripartum care. Patients want peripartum contraceptive care to provide comprehensive, anticipatory information; elicit and respond to their counseling and decision-making preferences; and demonstrate respect for their wishes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36736716
pii: S0010-7824(23)00013-6
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.109960
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contraceptive Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

109960

Subventions

Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : K08 HS025465
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P30 DK092926
Pays : United States
Organisme : FDA HHS
ID : U01 FD007803
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest Alex Peahl is a consultant for Maven. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest related to the subject matter of this paper.

Auteurs

Annie Minns (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Christine Dehlendorf (C)

San Francisco Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco CA, USA.

Alex F Peahl (AF)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Program on Women's Healthcare Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Michele Heisler (M)

Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, USA; School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Lauren E Owens (LE)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Barbara van Kainen (B)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Kirsten Bonawitz (K)

Medical School, University of Michigan, 1301 Catherine St., Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Michelle H Moniz (MH)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Program on Women's Healthcare Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: mmoniz@med.umich.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH