Analysis of reasons for medical malpractice litigation due to laminectomy.

VerdictSearch Westlaw Edge laminectomy litigation malpractice

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
ISSN: 1547-5646
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Spine
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101223545

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 05 2023
Historique:
received: 14 10 2022
accepted: 11 01 2023
medline: 3 5 2023
pubmed: 5 2 2023
entrez: 4 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this study was to identify the incidence and characteristics of malpractice lawsuits pertaining to laminectomy performed either as a stand-alone operation or concurrent with another procedure by querying the Westlaw Edge and VerdictSearch databases. Malpractice claims analysis is performed by several medical specialties to provide insight into patient values, methods to improve quality of care, and risk factors for litigation pertaining to specific procedures or treatments. Westlaw and VerdictSearch were queried using the keywords "laminectomy" and "spine." Claims were reviewed, with the inclusion criteria defined as a case filed between 2000 and 2022 that involved the plaintiff's basis of litigation resting on a claim of medical malpractice due to laminectomy. Additional collected data included the case date, verdict ruling, state or federal location of the filed claim, sustained injuries, and payment or settlement amount. After review of 4732 cases, 201 were identified as malpractice claims due to laminectomy. The most common reasons for litigation were delayed or denied treatment (n = 106), procedural errors (n = 38), inadequate management of postlaminectomy syndrome (n = 26), and incorrect procedural selection (n = 14). Regarding the verdict ruling, 47.3% (n = 95) of cases ruled in favor of the defendant, 9.0% (n = 18) resulted in a mixed ruling, 15.9% (n = 32) ruled in favor of the plaintiff, and 9.5% (n = 19) were resolved with an out-of-court settlement. An average payment of $4,530,277 resulted from the cases that ruled in favor of the plaintiff, while out-of-court settlements yielded an average payment of $1,193,146. This study suggests that there are several well-documented risk factors for malpractice claims attributed to laminectomy. The study findings suggest that prompt and accurate diagnosis, coordination of care, timely referral for surgical intervention, and understanding of the indications versus limitations of conservative therapy may help to mitigate the risk of litigation associated with laminectomy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36738465
doi: 10.3171/2023.1.SPINE221148
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

607-616

Auteurs

Alexander Bouterse (A)

1School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California.

Jacob Razzouk (J)

1School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California.

Daniel Bohen (D)

2University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Omar Ramos (O)

3Twin Cities Spine Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Olumide Danisa (O)

4Department of Orthopaedics, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California; and.

Wayne K Cheng (WK)

5Jerry L. Pettis Memorial Veterans Hospital, Loma Linda, California.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH