Dynamics and risk sharing in groups of selfish individuals.
Collective behavior
Prey predator interactions
Reinforcement learning
Journal
Journal of theoretical biology
ISSN: 1095-8541
Titre abrégé: J Theor Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376342
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 04 2023
07 04 2023
Historique:
received:
03
10
2022
revised:
24
01
2023
accepted:
29
01
2023
pubmed:
5
2
2023
medline:
8
3
2023
entrez:
4
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Understanding why animals organize in collective states is a central question of current research in, e.g., biology, physics, and psychology. More than 50 years ago, W.D. Hamilton postulated that the formation of animal herds may simply result from the individual's selfish motivation to minimize their predation risk. The latter is quantified by the domain of danger (DOD) which is given by the Voronoi area around each individual. In fact, simulations show that individuals aiming to reduce their DODs form compact groups similar to what is observed in many living systems. However, despite the apparent simplicity of this problem, it is not clear what motional strategy is required to find an optimal solution. Here, we use the framework of Multi Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) which gives the unbiased and optimal strategy of individuals to solve the selfish herd problem. We demonstrate that the motivation of individuals to reduce their predation risk naturally leads to pronounced collective behaviors including the formation of cohesive swirls. We reveal a previously unexplored rather complex intra-group motion which eventually leads to a evenly shared predation risk amongst selfish individuals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36738824
pii: S0022-5193(23)00029-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111433
pmc: PMC10020420
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
111433Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
J Theor Biol. 2002 Sep 7;218(1):1-11
pubmed: 12297066
Int J Adv Robot Syst. 2020 Sep 1;17(5):
pubmed: 34819959
Phys Rev Lett. 1995 Aug 7;75(6):1226-1229
pubmed: 10060237
Biol Lett. 2010 Feb 23;6(1):48-50
pubmed: 19793737
Phys Rev E. 2020 Jul;102(1-1):012601
pubmed: 32794942
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 13;107(28):12576-80
pubmed: 20616032
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e76250
pubmed: 24146843
J Theor Biol. 2004 May 7;228(1):107-13
pubmed: 15064086
Nat Commun. 2020 May 21;11(1):2547
pubmed: 32439919
J Theor Biol. 2019 Jun 21;471:82-90
pubmed: 30926522
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Jul 24;10(7):e1003697
pubmed: 25057853
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 22;278(1705):605-12
pubmed: 20810438
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2521-6
pubmed: 16959644
Biol Bull. 2002 Jun;202(3):296-305
pubmed: 12087003
J Theor Biol. 2017 Jul 7;424:84-90
pubmed: 28456461
Biosystems. 2016 Sep;147:40-66
pubmed: 27288936
J Theor Biol. 2002 Jul 21;217(2):183-94
pubmed: 12202112
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 18;15(12):e0243628
pubmed: 33338066
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 Jun;73(6 Pt 1):061924
pubmed: 16906881
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 21;11(1):20843
pubmed: 34675352
J Theor Biol. 1971 May;31(2):295-311
pubmed: 5104951
Q Rev Biol. 2016 Mar;91(1):1-24
pubmed: 27192777