Taste arbor structural variability analyzed across taste regions.

geniculate ganglion morphology neuron taste taste bud

Journal

The Journal of comparative neurology
ISSN: 1096-9861
Titre abrégé: J Comp Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0406041

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2023
Historique:
revised: 04 01 2023
received: 23 05 2022
accepted: 13 01 2023
pmc-release: 01 05 2024
pubmed: 7 2 2023
medline: 28 3 2023
entrez: 6 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Taste ganglion neurons are functionally and molecularly diverse, but until recently morphological diversity was completely unexplored. Specifically, taste arbors (the portion of the neuron within the taste bud) vary in structure, but the reason for this variability is unclear. Here, we analyzed structural variability in taste arbors to determine which factors determine their morphological diversity. To characterize arbor morphology and its relationship to taste bud cells capable of transducing taste stimuli (taste-transducing cell) number and type, we utilized sparse cell genetic labeling of taste ganglion neurons in combination with whole-mount immunohistochemistry. Reconstruction of 151 taste arbors revealed variation in arbor size, complexity, and symmetry. Overall, taste arbors exist on a continuum of complexity, cannot be categorized into discrete morphological groups, and do not have stereotyped endings. Arbor size/complexity was not related to the size of the taste bud in which it was located or the type of taste-transducing cell contacted (membranes within 180 nm). Instead, arbors could be broadly categorized into three groups: large asymmetrical arbors contacting many taste-transducing cells, small symmetrical arbors contacting one or two taste-transducing cells, and unbranched arbors. Neurons with multiple arbors had arbors in more than one of these categories, indicating that this variability is not an intrinsic feature of neuron type. Instead, we speculate that arbor structure is determined primarily by nerve fiber remodeling in response to cell turnover and that large asymmetrical arbors represent a particularly plastic state.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36740741
doi: 10.1002/cne.25459
pmc: PMC10082444
mid: NIHMS1866039
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

743-758

Subventions

Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC007176
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : F31 DC017660
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Neuron. 2012 Oct 18;76(2):266-80
pubmed: 23083731
Chem Senses. 2005 Jan;30 Suppl 1:i54-5
pubmed: 15738192
J Neurosci. 2021 Jun 2;41(22):4850-4866
pubmed: 33875572
J Ultrastruct Res. 1967 Aug;19(3):327-53
pubmed: 6053017
Brain Res. 1980 Sep 8;196(2):513-9
pubmed: 7397543
J Cell Biol. 1965 Nov;27(2):263-72
pubmed: 5884625
J Comp Neurol. 2003 Apr 21;459(1):15-24
pubmed: 12629664
J Comp Neurol. 2020 Apr 1;528(5):756-771
pubmed: 31587284
Cell. 2011 Dec 23;147(7):1615-27
pubmed: 22196735
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0148315
pubmed: 26901525
Cell. 2001 Aug 10;106(3):381-90
pubmed: 11509186
Chem Senses. 2017 Oct 31;42(9):747-758
pubmed: 29099943
Chem Senses. 2020 May 21;45(4):261-273
pubmed: 32157267
eNeuro. 2020 Feb 3;7(1):
pubmed: 31988217
J Biol Chem. 2012 May 11;287(20):16791-800
pubmed: 22442142
J Comp Neurol. 1985 May 1;235(1):48-60
pubmed: 3989005
J Comp Neurol. 1988 Apr 1;270(1):1-10, 56-7
pubmed: 3372731
Elife. 2012 Dec 18;1:e00181
pubmed: 23256042
Science. 2009 Oct 16;326(5951):443-5
pubmed: 19833970
J Anat. 2016 Dec;229(6):778-790
pubmed: 27476649
Cell. 2015 Dec 17;163(7):1783-1795
pubmed: 26687362
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Sep;18(9):530-546
pubmed: 28775344
Bioessays. 2013 Dec;35(12):1111-8
pubmed: 24105910
J Vis Exp. 2021 Feb 11;(168):
pubmed: 33645587
Brain Res. 2011 Jan 7;1367:13-21
pubmed: 20971092
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 16;115(3):E516-E525
pubmed: 29282324
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:389-442
pubmed: 10202544
BMC Biol. 2006 Mar 30;4:7
pubmed: 16573824
Science. 1980 Oct 10;210(4466):153-7
pubmed: 7414326
Cell. 2014 Dec 18;159(7):1640-51
pubmed: 25525881
J Neurosci. 2022 Feb 2;42(5):804-816
pubmed: 34876471
Neuron. 2018 May 2;98(3):547-561.e10
pubmed: 29681531
Nature. 2013 Mar 14;495(7440):223-6
pubmed: 23467090
Cell. 2003 Feb 7;112(3):293-301
pubmed: 12581520
Development. 2015 Nov 1;142(21):3620-9
pubmed: 26534983
Pflugers Arch. 2021 Jan;473(1):3-13
pubmed: 32936320
Dev Biol. 2015 Sep 15;405(2):225-36
pubmed: 26164656
Nat Commun. 2017 Oct 2;8(1):760
pubmed: 28970527
Cell. 2019 Oct 3;179(2):392-402.e15
pubmed: 31543264
Nature. 2017 Aug 17;548(7667):330-333
pubmed: 28792937
Curr Biol. 2004 Jul 13;14(13):R497-500
pubmed: 15242626
eNeuro. 2015 Dec 31;2(6):
pubmed: 26730405
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Dec;82(6):2970-88
pubmed: 10601433
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003 Oct;15(5):621-32
pubmed: 14519398
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53399
pubmed: 23320081
J Comp Neurol. 2017 Dec 15;525(18):3935-3950
pubmed: 28856690
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Nov 30;855:28-49
pubmed: 9929584

Auteurs

Lisa C Ohman (LC)

Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Lama Hanbali (L)

Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Robin F Krimm (RF)

Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Articles similaires

alpha-Synuclein Humans Animals Mice Lewy Body Disease
Animals Optogenetics Visual Cortex Neurons Mice
Humans Female Longitudinal Studies Child Male
West Nile Fever Animals West Nile virus Humans Enteric Nervous System

Classifications MeSH