Eczema Care Online behavioural interventions to support self-care for children and young people: two independent, pragmatic, randomised controlled trials.


Journal

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
ISSN: 1756-1833
Titre abrégé: BMJ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8900488

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 12 2022
Historique:
entrez: 6 2 2023
pubmed: 7 2 2023
medline: 8 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To determine the effectiveness of two online behavioural interventions, one for parents and carers and one for young people, to support eczema self-management. Two independent, pragmatic, parallel group, unmasked, randomised controlled trials. 98 general practices in England. Parents and carers of children (0-12 years) with eczema (trial 1) and young people (13-25 years) with eczema (trial 2), excluding people with inactive or very mild eczema (≤5 on POEM, the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure). Participants were randomised (1:1) using online software to receive usual eczema care or an online (www.EczemaCareOnline.org.uk) behavioural intervention for eczema plus usual care. Primary outcome was eczema symptoms rated using POEM (range 0-28, with 28 being very severe) every four weeks over 24 weeks. Outcomes were reported by parents or carers for children and by self-report for young people. Secondary outcomes included POEM score every four weeks over 52 weeks, quality of life, eczema control, itch intensity (young people only), patient enablement, treatment use, perceived barriers to treatment use, and intervention use. Analyses were carried out separately for the two trials and according to intention-to-treat principles. 340 parents or carers of children (169 usual care; 171 intervention) and 337 young people (169 usual care; 168 intervention) were randomised. The mean baseline POEM score was 12.8 (standard deviation 5.3) for parents and carers and 15.2 (5.4) for young people. Three young people withdrew from follow-up but did not withdraw their data. All randomised participants were included in the analyses. At 24 weeks, follow-up rates were 91.5% (311/340) for parents or carers and 90.2% (304/337) for young people. After controlling for baseline eczema severity and confounders, compared with usual care groups over 24 weeks, eczema severity improved in the intervention groups: mean difference in POEM score -1.5 (95% confidence interval -2.5 to -0.6; P=0.002) for parents or carers and -1.9 (-3.0 to -0.8; P<0.001) for young people. The number needed to treat to achieve a 2.5 difference in POEM score at 24 weeks was 6 in both trials. Improvements were sustained to 52 weeks in both trials. Enablement showed a statistically significant difference favouring the intervention group in both trials: adjusted mean difference at 24 weeks -0.7 (95% confidence interval -1.0 to -0.4) for parents or carers and -0.9 (-1.3 to -0.6) for young people. No harms were identified in either group. Two online interventions for self-management of eczema aimed at parents or carers of children with eczema and at young people with eczema provide a useful, sustained benefit in managing eczema severity in children and young people when offered in addition to usual eczema care. ISRCTN registry ISRCTN79282252.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36740888
doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072007
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Pragmatic Clinical Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e072007

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 205039/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: no support from any organisation other than the National Institute for Health and Care Research for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work, other than LH has received consultancy fees from the University of Oxford on an educational grant funded by Pfizer, unrelated to the submitted work.

Auteurs

Miriam Santer (M)

Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.

Ingrid Muller (I)

Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.

Taeko Becque (T)

Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.

Beth Stuart (B)

Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.
Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Julie Hooper (J)

Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.

Mary Steele (M)

Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.

Sylvia Wilczynska (S)

King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.

Tracey H Sach (TH)

Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Matthew J Ridd (MJ)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Amanda Roberts (A)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Amina Ahmed (A)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Lucy Yardley (L)

School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Paul Little (P)

Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.

Kate Greenwell (K)

School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Katy Sivyer (K)

School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Jacqui Nuttall (J)

Southampton Clinical Trial Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.

Gareth Griffiths (G)

Southampton Clinical Trial Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.

Sandra Lawton (S)

The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, Rotherham, UK.

Sinéad M Langan (SM)

Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Laura M Howells (LM)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Paul Leighton (P)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Hywel C Williams (HC)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Kim S Thomas (KS)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH