IFNα and 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine combined with a dendritic-cell targeting DNA vaccine alter tumor immune cell infiltration in the B16F10 melanoma model.
5-Aza-2’-deoxycitidine
B16F10 melanoma
CCL20
CD8+ T-cells
chemokine
dendritic cell
interferon
vaccine
Journal
Frontiers in immunology
ISSN: 1664-3224
Titre abrégé: Front Immunol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560960
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
19
10
2022
accepted:
29
12
2022
entrez:
6
2
2023
pubmed:
7
2
2023
medline:
8
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
DNA vaccines containing a fusion of the gene encoding chemokine MIP-3α (CCL20), the ligand for CCR6 on immature dendritic cells (DCs), to melanoma-associated antigen genes have enhanced anti-tumor immunity and efficacy compared to those lacking the chemokine gene. Previous work has shown that type-I interferon (IFNα or IFN) and 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5Aza) significantly enhance the therapeutic benefit of DNA vaccines as measured by reduced tumor burden and improved mouse survival. Here, we explored mouse intratumoral immune correlates underlying the therapeutic benefit of this combination regimen (vaccine, IFN, and 5Aza) as compared to vaccine alone and IFN and 5Aza without vaccine, focusing on chemokine mRNA expression by qRT-PCR and inflammatory cellular infiltration into the tumor microenvironment (TME) by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The combination group significantly upregulated intratumoral mRNA expression of key immune infiltration chemokines XCL1 and CXCL10. Flow cytometric analyses of tumor suspensions exhibited greater tumor infiltration of CD8+ DCs, CCR7+ DCs, and NK cells in the combination group, as well as reduced levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in vaccinated groups. The mice receiving combination therapy also had greater proportions of effector/memory T-cells (Tem), in addition to showing an enhanced infiltration of Tem and central memory CD8+ T-cells, (Tcm). Tem and Tcm populations both correlated with smaller tumor size. Immunohistochemical analysis of tumors confirmed that CD8+ cells were more abundant overall and especially in the tumor parenchyma with combination therapy. Efficient targeting of antigen to immature DCs with a chemokine-fusion vaccine offers a potential alternative approach to classic and dendritic cell-based vaccines. Combining this approach with IFNα and 5Aza treatments significantly improved vaccine efficacy. This treatment creates an environment of increased inflammatory chemokines that facilitates the trafficking of CD8+ DCs, NK cells, and CD8+ T-cells, especially memory cells, while reducing the number of MDSCs. Importantly, in the combination group, CD8+ cells were more able to penetrate the tumor mass in addition to being more numerous. Further analysis of the pathways engaged by our combination therapy is expected to provide additional insights into melanoma pathogenesis and facilitate the development of novel treatment strategies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36741387
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1074644
pmc: PMC9892704
doi:
Substances chimiques
Decitabine
776B62CQ27
Interferon-alpha
0
RNA, Messenger
0
Vaccines, DNA
0
Cancer Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1074644Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : T32 AI007291
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA006973
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : K24 AI143447
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI148710
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Gordy, Sandhu, Fessler, Luo, Kapoor, Ayeh, Hui, Schill, Chen, Wang, Karanika, Sunshine, Karakousis and Markham.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Authors RM and JG are inventors on a patent 11419928 for the vaccine that has been issued to Johns Hopkins University. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any further commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov;146(11):2897-2911
pubmed: 32748119
Cell Death Dis. 2015 Jun 18;6:e1792
pubmed: 26086965
Nat Rev Cancer. 2021 Jun;21(6):360-378
pubmed: 33907315
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2020 Apr;69(4):569-580
pubmed: 31980915
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 01;21(15):
pubmed: 32752264
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33
pubmed: 35020204
Oncogene. 2021 Aug;40(34):5253-5261
pubmed: 34290401
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Apr 14;11(4):
pubmed: 33919875
Immunol Rev. 2010 Mar;234(1):18-31
pubmed: 20193009
Immunity. 2006 Feb;24(2):191-201
pubmed: 16473831
J Immunother Cancer. 2016 Dec 20;4:96
pubmed: 28018602
Front Immunol. 2020 May 29;11:976
pubmed: 32547545
Trends Immunol. 2016 Mar;37(3):208-220
pubmed: 26858199
Tissue Antigens. 2008 Sep;72(3):187-94
pubmed: 18627571
Transl Oncol. 2021 Jan;14(1):100930
pubmed: 33186888
Cancer Cell. 2019 Nov 11;36(5):471-482
pubmed: 31715131
Cell. 2018 Feb 22;172(5):1022-1037.e14
pubmed: 29429633
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Dec 04;11(12):
pubmed: 31817234
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 18;11:708943
pubmed: 34222030
Clin Epigenetics. 2021 Aug 27;13(1):166
pubmed: 34452630
J Invest Dermatol. 2017 Jan;137(1):159-169
pubmed: 27623509
Front Immunol. 2021 Feb 03;11:621254
pubmed: 33613552
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Oct 01;7:212
pubmed: 31632965
Front Immunol. 2012 Feb 10;3:14
pubmed: 22566900
Br J Cancer. 2018 Jan;118(1):9-16
pubmed: 29319049