Understory species composition mediates soil greenhouse gas fluxes by affecting bacterial community diversity in boreal forests.
boreal forest
greenhouse gas
larch forest
soil bacterial community
understory species
Journal
Frontiers in microbiology
ISSN: 1664-302X
Titre abrégé: Front Microbiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
05
11
2022
accepted:
05
12
2022
entrez:
6
2
2023
pubmed:
7
2
2023
medline:
7
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Plant species composition in forest ecosystems can alter soil greenhouse gas (GHG) budgets by affecting soil properties and microbial communities. However, little attention has been paid to the forest types characterized by understory vegetation, especially in boreal forests where understory species contribute significantly to carbon and nitrogen cycling. In the present study, soil GHG fluxes, soil properties and bacterial community, and soil environmental conditions were investigated among three types of larch forest [ The results showed that differences in understory species significantly affected soil GHG fluxes, properties, and bacterial composition among types of larch forest. Soil CO Our study highlights the importance of understory species in regulating soil GHG fluxes in boreal forests, which furthers our understanding of the role of boreal forests in sustainable development and climate change mitigation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36741883
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1090169
pmc: PMC9894877
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1090169Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Duan, Xiao, Cai, Man, Ge, Gao and Mencuccini.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 10;838(Pt 1):155983
pubmed: 35588825
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 15;856(Pt 1):158907
pubmed: 36150592
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 20;840:156469
pubmed: 35679935
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 20;16(16):
pubmed: 31434321
Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 25;13:868862
pubmed: 35547151
Bioresour Technol. 2017 Oct;241:473-481
pubmed: 28599226
AMB Express. 2020 Mar 31;10(1):61
pubmed: 32236738
Ecology. 2007 Jun;88(6):1354-64
pubmed: 17601128
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Jan 13;:
pubmed: 31930624
Water Res. 2012 Mar 15;46(4):1027-37
pubmed: 22227243
Bioresour Technol. 2018 Aug;261:19-27
pubmed: 29653330
Environ Microbiol. 2006 Feb;8(2):214-22
pubmed: 16423010
Ambio. 2016 Feb;45 Suppl 2:175-87
pubmed: 26744052
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 3;114(40):10749-10754
pubmed: 28923961
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Nov;27(21):5657-5669
pubmed: 34363712
J Environ Manage. 2021 Mar 1;281:111905
pubmed: 33388713
Microbiol Rev. 1989 Mar;53(1):68-84
pubmed: 2496288
New Phytol. 2013 May;198(3):656-669
pubmed: 23521345
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(42):63753-63767
pubmed: 35461419
Front Microbiol. 2019 Apr 26;10:870
pubmed: 31105668
Mol Microbiol. 2004 Oct;54(1):148-58
pubmed: 15458412
Ecol Evol. 2018 Jan 08;8(3):1693-1704
pubmed: 29435244
Bioresour Technol. 2021 Oct;337:125397
pubmed: 34139563
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 29;13(1):e0191952
pubmed: 29377926
Trends Microbiol. 2013 Dec;21(12):641-51
pubmed: 24139848
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Jan 1;502:280-6
pubmed: 25261818
Chemosphere. 2020 Jan;239:124795
pubmed: 31520977
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2015 Sep;39(5):729-49
pubmed: 25934121