Treadmill training of rats after sciatic nerve graft does not alter accuracy of muscle reinnervation.

misdirected reinnervation motoneuron nerve regeneration physical exercise recovery of function sciatic nerve

Journal

Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 22 09 2022
accepted: 23 12 2022
entrez: 6 2 2023
pubmed: 7 2 2023
medline: 7 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

After peripheral nerve lesions, surgical reconstruction facilitates axonal regeneration and motor reinnervation. However, functional recovery is impaired by aberrant reinnervation. We tested whether training therapy by treadmill exercise (9 × 250 m/week) before (run-idle), after (idle-run), or both before and after (run-run) sciatic nerve graft improves the accuracy of reinnervation in rats. Female Lewis rats (LEW/SsNHsd) were either trained for 12 weeks (run) or not trained (kept under control conditions, idle). The right sciatic nerves were then excised and reconstructed with 5 mm of a congenic allograft. One week later, training started in the run-run and idle-run groups for another 12 weeks. No further training was conducted in the run-idle and idle-idle groups. Reinnervation was measured using the following parameters: counting of retrogradely labeled motoneurons, walking track analysis, and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) recordings. In intact rats, the common fibular (peroneal) and the soleus nerve received axons from 549 ± 83 motoneurons. In the run-idle group, 94% of these motoneurons had regenerated 13 weeks after the nerve graft. In the idle-run group, 81% of the normal number of motoneurons had regenerated into the denervated musculature and 87% in both run-run and idle-idle groups. Despite reinnervation, functional outcome was poor: walking tracks indicated no functional improvement of motion in any group. However, in the operated hindlimb of run-idle rats, the CMAP of the soleus muscle reached 11.9 mV (normal 16.3 mV), yet only 6.3-8.1 mV in the other groups. Treadmill training neither altered the accuracy of reinnervation nor the functional recovery, and pre-operative training (run-idle) led to a higher motor unit activation after regeneration.

Sections du résumé

Background and purpose UNASSIGNED
After peripheral nerve lesions, surgical reconstruction facilitates axonal regeneration and motor reinnervation. However, functional recovery is impaired by aberrant reinnervation.
Materials and methods UNASSIGNED
We tested whether training therapy by treadmill exercise (9 × 250 m/week) before (run-idle), after (idle-run), or both before and after (run-run) sciatic nerve graft improves the accuracy of reinnervation in rats. Female Lewis rats (LEW/SsNHsd) were either trained for 12 weeks (run) or not trained (kept under control conditions, idle). The right sciatic nerves were then excised and reconstructed with 5 mm of a congenic allograft. One week later, training started in the run-run and idle-run groups for another 12 weeks. No further training was conducted in the run-idle and idle-idle groups. Reinnervation was measured using the following parameters: counting of retrogradely labeled motoneurons, walking track analysis, and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) recordings.
Results UNASSIGNED
In intact rats, the common fibular (peroneal) and the soleus nerve received axons from 549 ± 83 motoneurons. In the run-idle group, 94% of these motoneurons had regenerated 13 weeks after the nerve graft. In the idle-run group, 81% of the normal number of motoneurons had regenerated into the denervated musculature and 87% in both run-run and idle-idle groups. Despite reinnervation, functional outcome was poor: walking tracks indicated no functional improvement of motion in any group. However, in the operated hindlimb of run-idle rats, the CMAP of the soleus muscle reached 11.9 mV (normal 16.3 mV), yet only 6.3-8.1 mV in the other groups.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Treadmill training neither altered the accuracy of reinnervation nor the functional recovery, and pre-operative training (run-idle) led to a higher motor unit activation after regeneration.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36742044
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1050822
pmc: PMC9893025
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1050822

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Barham, Andermahr, Majczyński, Sławińska, Vogt and Neiss.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Neurosurg. 2014 Feb;120(2):493-501
pubmed: 24116727
Ann Anat. 2011 Jul;193(4):354-61
pubmed: 21498059
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017 Sep;300(9):1654-1661
pubmed: 28463452
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010;65(12):1329-37
pubmed: 21340223
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jun;232(6):2021-33
pubmed: 24623354
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Jan;25(1):24-34
pubmed: 20858910
J Comp Neurol. 2009 Nov 10;517(2):245-55
pubmed: 19731339
Glia. 2004 Aug 1;47(2):120-9
pubmed: 15185391
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2000 Oct;16(7):563-7
pubmed: 11083397
J Vis Exp. 2020 Apr 18;(158):
pubmed: 32364547
Ann Plast Surg. 1992 Jun;28(6):538-44
pubmed: 1622035
Exp Neurol. 2008 Jun;211(2):489-93
pubmed: 18420199
Adv Neurol. 1988;49:211-24
pubmed: 3278542
Muscle Nerve. 2009 Apr;39(4):480-8
pubmed: 19260056
Cells Tissues Organs. 2011;193(5):298-309
pubmed: 21411964
Microsurgery. 1999;19(5):247-53
pubmed: 10413791
Microsurgery. 1989;10(1):56-70
pubmed: 2725257
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2013 Mar;18(1):30-6
pubmed: 23521641
Neuroscience. 2011 May 19;182:241-7
pubmed: 21440044
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Jan;78(1):70-7
pubmed: 9014961
J Comp Neurol. 2011 Jan 1;519(1):21-33
pubmed: 21120925
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Jun;109(11):2645-57
pubmed: 23468390
Exp Neurol. 2009 Sep;219(1):258-65
pubmed: 19500575
Muscle Nerve. 2011 Jul;44(1):55-62
pubmed: 21488054
J Reconstr Microsurg. 1997 Apr;13(3):185-92
pubmed: 9101448
J Physiol. 1917 Sep 12;51(4-5):318-46
pubmed: 16993388
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):935-8
pubmed: 25931763
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989 Jan;83(1):129-38
pubmed: 2909054
Ann Anat. 1992 Oct;174(5):419-33
pubmed: 1449219
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1960 Aug;12:738-41
pubmed: 13820840
Neurobiol Aging. 1998 Jan-Feb;19(1):83-8
pubmed: 9562508
J Neurosci Methods. 1997 Jul 18;75(1):49-54
pubmed: 9262143
Brain. 2003 Jan;126(Pt 1):115-33
pubmed: 12477700
Brain Res. 1991 Sep 20;559(2):315-21
pubmed: 1794104
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Jul-Aug;22(4):355-66
pubmed: 18326889
J Microsc. 1986 Jul;143(Pt 1):3-45
pubmed: 3761363
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2018;82(1):111-118
pubmed: 29543223
NeuroRehabilitation. 2018;42(1):113-119
pubmed: 29400678
Neuroophthalmology. 2019 Feb 8;44(4):262-266
pubmed: 33012913
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Oct;73(4):405-11
pubmed: 24317246
Neuroscience. 2011 Oct 27;194:337-48
pubmed: 21864654
Exp Neurol. 1987 Aug;97(2):289-300
pubmed: 3609213
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 1990 Jan 1;1(3):275-80
pubmed: 21551567
Front Neurosci. 2022 May 13;16:895076
pubmed: 35645727
J Neurosci Res. 2000 Jun 1;60(5):666-77
pubmed: 10820438
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;185(3):469-83
pubmed: 17955222
Exp Neurol. 2008 Jun;211(2):339-50
pubmed: 18448099
J Neurosci. 1988 Mar;8(3):1026-31
pubmed: 3346713
Muscle Nerve. 2015 Jan;51(1):83-91
pubmed: 24752648
J Neurosci Methods. 2000 Mar 15;96(2):89-96
pubmed: 10720672
Ann Anat. 2011 Jul;193(4):347-53
pubmed: 21514121
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Jul;38(7):1267-76
pubmed: 16826023
J Neurotrauma. 2004 Jan;21(1):95-108
pubmed: 14987469
J Neurotrauma. 2002 Nov;19(11):1475-85
pubmed: 12490012
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992 Feb;89(2):251-8
pubmed: 1732892
Eur J Neurosci. 1999 Apr;11(4):1369-78
pubmed: 10103132
J Neurosci Methods. 2016 Feb 1;259:122-128
pubmed: 26658222
Muscle Nerve. 1990 Sep;13(9):801-3
pubmed: 2233866
Acta Histochem. 2013 Jun;115(5):460-9
pubmed: 23265777
Anat Rec. 1986 May;215(1):71-81
pubmed: 3706794
Exp Neurol. 1982 Sep;77(3):634-43
pubmed: 7117467
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 1998;3(4):277-82
pubmed: 10970128
J Neurosci Res. 2001 Jan 15;63(2):214-23
pubmed: 11169632
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Jan;25(1):15-23
pubmed: 20930211
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985 Mar;75(3):384-8
pubmed: 2579408
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2021 Mar 1;21(1):68-78
pubmed: 33657756
Muscle Nerve. 2011 Apr;43(4):500-9
pubmed: 21305568
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 May;96(5):1988-95
pubmed: 14634028
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 1;101(22):8473-8
pubmed: 15159540
J Neurosci Methods. 1991 Jul;38(2-3):111-4
pubmed: 1784117
Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1990 Dec 15;57(2):163-74
pubmed: 2073717
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2000;16(2):117-126
pubmed: 12671214
Life Sci. 1979 Jul 9;25(2):171-9
pubmed: 491843

Auteurs

Mohammed Barham (M)

Department II of Anatomy, University of Cologne and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Jonas Andermahr (J)

Kreiskrankenhaus Mechernich, Mechernich, Germany.

Henryk Majczyński (H)

Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa, Poland.

Urszula Sławińska (U)

Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa, Poland.

Johannes Vogt (J)

Department II of Anatomy, University of Cologne and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Cluster of Excellence for Aging Research (CECAD) and Center of Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Wolfram F Neiss (WF)

Department I of Anatomy, University of Cologne and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Classifications MeSH