Frontal Recess Cells in International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC); Prevalence, Infection Incidence, and Relation to Frontal Sinus Infection in Chronic Sinusitis Patients.

Endoscopic sinus surgery Frontal recess Frontal recess cells Frontal sinus IFAC

Journal

Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India
ISSN: 2231-3796
Titre abrégé: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9422551

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 13 11 2021
accepted: 27 12 2021
entrez: 6 2 2023
pubmed: 7 2 2023
medline: 7 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Frontal recess cells have many types with different sizes, arrangement, and extend. It plays an important role in successful functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) as most causes of failure are related to it. Outline the prevalence of the frontal recess cells, pathological incidence of each cell regarding to frontal sinus pathology. Prospective study on 100 consecutive patients (200 sides) complaining from nasal and sinus symptoms which did not respond to medical management and indicated for FESS. Anterior group was infected in 30.8%; agger nasi cell (ANC) present in 97% (25.8% infected, 74.2% not infected), supra agger cell (SAC) present in 48% (39.6% infected, 60.4% not infected), supra agger frontal cell (SAFC) present in 11% (36.4% infected, 63.6% not infected). Posterior group was infected in 24.8%; supra bulla cell (SBC) present in 72% (30.6% infected, 69.4% not infected), supra bulla frontal cell (SBFC) present in 23% (17.4% infected, 82.6% not infected), supra orbital ethmoid cell (SOEC) present in 42% of cases (19% infected, 81% not infected). Medial group [frontal septal cell (FSC)] was present in 21% (33.3% infected, 66.7% not infected). FSC, SAC, SAFC, and SBC showed high infection rate in association with infected frontal sinus, while, the SOEC, ANC, and SBFC did not have such high infection rate. Frontal recess cells show no difference in their prevalence either if the frontal sinus infected or not, however their infection rate show significant difference.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36742792
doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-03069-8
pii: 3069
pmc: PMC9895715
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

4748-4755

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interestThe authors declare no Conflict of Interest.

Références

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Jul;6(7):677-96
pubmed: 26991922
Rhinology. 2020 Feb 20;58(Suppl S29):1-464
pubmed: 32077450
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Jun;4(6):502-6
pubmed: 24616299
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Nov;276(11):3139-3146
pubmed: 31471655
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2001 Feb;34(1):77-90
pubmed: 11344063
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018 Jul;8(7):825-830
pubmed: 29457874
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2019 May;33(3):323-330
pubmed: 30754987

Auteurs

Ahmed Abdelfattah Bayomy Nofal (AAB)

Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

Mohammad Waheed El-Anwar (MW)

Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

Classifications MeSH