Mitigating work conditions that can inhibit learning from errors: Benefits of error management climate perceptions.

emotions error consequences error management climate error type learning from errors time pressure

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 31 08 2022
accepted: 04 01 2023
entrez: 6 2 2023
pubmed: 7 2 2023
medline: 7 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Professionals do not always learn from their errors; rather, the way in which professionals experience errors and their work environment may not foster, but can rather inhibit error learning. In the wake of a series of accounting scandals, including Royal Ahold in Netherlands, Lehman Brothers in the United States, and Wirecard in Germany, within the context of financial auditing, we explore four audit-specific conditions at the workplace that could be negatively associated with learning: small error consequences, routine-type errors, negative emotions, and high time pressure. Then, we examine how perceptions of an open or blame error management climate (EMC) moderate the negative relationship between the four work conditions and learning from errors. Using an experiential questionnaire approach, we analyze data provided by 141 Dutch auditors across all hierarchical ranks from two audit firms. Our results show that open EMC perceptions mitigate the negative relationship between negative emotions and error learning, as well as the negative relationship between time pressure and error learning. While we expected that blame EMC perceptions would exacerbate the negative relationship between negative emotions and error learning, we find a mitigating effect of low blame EMC perceptions. Further, and contrary to our expectations, we find that blame EMC perceptions mitigate the negative relationship between small error consequences and error learning, so that overall, more error learning takes place regardless of consequences when participants experience a blame EMC. We derive several recommendations for future research, and our findings generate specific implications on how (audit) organizations can foster learning from errors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36743251
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1033470
pmc: PMC9895947
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1033470

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 van Mourik, Grohnert and Gold.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(4):963-70
pubmed: 16834519
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Jul;105(1):69-75
pubmed: 20551028
J Organ Behav. 2017 Jan;38(1):108-123
pubmed: 28133415
Acad Med. 2011 Mar;86(3):307-13
pubmed: 21248608
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:661-87
pubmed: 25251490
Adm Sci Q. 1978 Jun;23(2):224-53
pubmed: 10307892
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Sep;90(5):857-71
pubmed: 16162059
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Jun;18(3):671-5
pubmed: 22435605
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Nov;65(5):861-76
pubmed: 8246114
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 21;12:716915
pubmed: 35126221
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Nov;39(4):709-22
pubmed: 18183883
Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:465-489
pubmed: 27648988
Psychol Bull. 1954 Jul;51(4):327-58
pubmed: 13177800
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Nov;90(6):1228-40
pubmed: 16316276

Auteurs

Oscar van Mourik (O)

Department of Accounting, School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Therese Grohnert (T)

Department of Educational Research and Development, School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Anna Gold (A)

Department of Accounting, School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH