Statistical methods to estimate the impact of remote teaching on university students' performance.
Difference-In-Differences
Distance learning
Higher education
Mixed model
Multilevel model
Journal
Quality & quantity
ISSN: 0033-5177
Titre abrégé: Qual Quant
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 1245762
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Jan 2023
30 Jan 2023
Historique:
accepted:
10
01
2023
entrez:
6
2
2023
pubmed:
7
2
2023
medline:
7
2
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic manifested around the World since February 2020, leading to disruptive effects on many aspects of people social life. The suspension of face-to-face teaching activities in schools and universities was the first containment measure adopted by the Governments to deal with the spread of the virus. Remote teaching has been the emergency solution implemented by schools and universities to limit the damages of schools and universities closure to students' learning. In this contribution we intend to suggest to policy makers and researchers how to assess the impact of emergency policies on remote learning in academia by analysing students' careers. In particular, we exploit the quasi-experimental setting arising from the sudden implementation of remote teaching in the second semester of academic year 2019/2020: we compare the performance of the cohort 2019/2020, which represents the treatment group, with the performance of the cohort 2018/2019, which represents the control group. We distinguish the impact of remote teaching at two levels: degree program and single courses within a degree program. We suggest to use Difference-In-Differences approach in the former case and multilevel modeling in the latter one. The proposal is illustrated analysing administrative data referred to freshmen of cohorts 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 for a sample of degree programs of the University of Florence (Italy).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36743855
doi: 10.1007/s11135-023-01612-z
pii: 1612
pmc: PMC9885921
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1-19Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestThe authors declare the absence of competing interests.
Références
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 17;12:702163
pubmed: 34484052
Eur J Psychol. 2022 Aug 31;18(3):302-318
pubmed: 36348822
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):499-512
pubmed: 11419809
Lancet Infect Dis. 2009 Aug;9(8):473-81
pubmed: 19628172
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jan 25;62:377-382
pubmed: 33552498
Comput Human Behav. 2021 Jun;119:106713
pubmed: 34866769
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Nov;59:186-194
pubmed: 33042535
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Nov 12;60:445-450
pubmed: 33251004
Data Brief. 2020 Dec;33:106421
pubmed: 33102666
Int J Educ Res Open. 2020;1:100011
pubmed: 35059662
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Oct 06;7:594261
pubmed: 33134368
Stat Methods Appt. 2022 Oct 12;:1-22
pubmed: 36245948
J Surg Educ. 2021 Mar-Apr;78(2):370-374
pubmed: 32819868
J Surg Res. 2021 Aug;264:534-543
pubmed: 33862581
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 9;15(10):e0239490
pubmed: 33035228
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Apr 16;14:207
pubmed: 24739814
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 23;12:642593
pubmed: 33967903
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 22;12:643408
pubmed: 34239475
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 17;17(14):
pubmed: 32709128
J Public Econ. 2020 Nov;191:104271
pubmed: 32873994
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021 Jan;120:105802
pubmed: 33318719