Internet-based self-help intervention for procrastination: randomized control group trial protocol.
Cognitive behavioural therapy
Control group randomized trial
Internet-based intervention
Procrastination
Self-regulated learning theory
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Feb 2023
06 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
30
11
2022
accepted:
22
01
2023
entrez:
7
2
2023
pubmed:
8
2
2023
medline:
9
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Procrastination or "postponing until later" is a common phenomenon defined as the intentional delay in partaking in and finishing important activities despite negative outcomes potentially outweighing the positive. Procrastination adversely affects mental health, academic performance, and career achievement. Although studies on procrastination intervention methods and effectiveness exist, utility and cost-effectiveness are limited by various factors, including practitioner availability and skills, barriers to participant participation, and the time investment required by participants. Thus, internet-based interventions could increase the availability of evidence-based treatments for adult procrastination. This study explored the efficacy of an online-based self-help intervention in the context of voluntary procrastination among undergraduate psychology students. The study design is a randomized controlled trial. Participants who self-reported procrastination-related problems and behaviours were included in the trial consisting of two groups; specifically, one group undergoing a self-directed internet-based intervention for coping with procrastination (N=160) and (2) another group with delayed access to the intervention programmes (waitlist control group; N=160). Follow-up assessments were scheduled 6 and 12 weeks after baseline, and the control group received the intervention after 12 weeks. Procrastination, measured by the Irrational Procrastination Scale and the Simple Procrastination Scale, was examined as the primary outcome. Meanwhile, secondary outcomes included susceptibility, stress, depression, anxiety, well-being, self-efficacy, time management strategies, self-control, cognition, and emotion regulation. Other measures comprised acceptability (e.g., intervention satisfaction, potential side effects, and expectations) and learning behaviour analysis to reflect adherence. This randomized controlled trial will provide data on the effectiveness of online interventions for adult procrastination. If deemed effective, this low-cost, high-coverage internet-based intervention could aid more people who seek to address their procrastination. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=171246 .
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Procrastination or "postponing until later" is a common phenomenon defined as the intentional delay in partaking in and finishing important activities despite negative outcomes potentially outweighing the positive. Procrastination adversely affects mental health, academic performance, and career achievement. Although studies on procrastination intervention methods and effectiveness exist, utility and cost-effectiveness are limited by various factors, including practitioner availability and skills, barriers to participant participation, and the time investment required by participants. Thus, internet-based interventions could increase the availability of evidence-based treatments for adult procrastination.
METHODS
METHODS
This study explored the efficacy of an online-based self-help intervention in the context of voluntary procrastination among undergraduate psychology students. The study design is a randomized controlled trial. Participants who self-reported procrastination-related problems and behaviours were included in the trial consisting of two groups; specifically, one group undergoing a self-directed internet-based intervention for coping with procrastination (N=160) and (2) another group with delayed access to the intervention programmes (waitlist control group; N=160). Follow-up assessments were scheduled 6 and 12 weeks after baseline, and the control group received the intervention after 12 weeks. Procrastination, measured by the Irrational Procrastination Scale and the Simple Procrastination Scale, was examined as the primary outcome. Meanwhile, secondary outcomes included susceptibility, stress, depression, anxiety, well-being, self-efficacy, time management strategies, self-control, cognition, and emotion regulation. Other measures comprised acceptability (e.g., intervention satisfaction, potential side effects, and expectations) and learning behaviour analysis to reflect adherence.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
This randomized controlled trial will provide data on the effectiveness of online interventions for adult procrastination. If deemed effective, this low-cost, high-coverage internet-based intervention could aid more people who seek to address their procrastination.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=171246 .
Identifiants
pubmed: 36747265
doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07112-7
pii: 10.1186/s13063-023-07112-7
pmc: PMC9900198
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
82Subventions
Organisme : Beijing Municipal Social Science Foundation
ID : 19JYB023
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Soc Psychol Educ. 2021;24(3):877-893
pubmed: 34121913
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 20;20(1):130
pubmed: 32197589
J Affect Disord. 2015 Nov 15;187:136-41
pubmed: 26331687
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 05;9:1103
pubmed: 30026713
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 18;12:768581
pubmed: 34733223
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 11;13(12):e0208162
pubmed: 30533013
J Prev Interv Community. 2018 Apr-Jun;46(2):117-130
pubmed: 29485384
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Apr;144(2):400-9
pubmed: 25688905
Am Psychol. 2002 Sep;57(9):705-17
pubmed: 12237980
Learn Individ Differ. 2017 Feb;54:160-172
pubmed: 28943742
Am Psychol. 2021 Apr;76(3):409-426
pubmed: 32772538
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;164(11):1676-83
pubmed: 17974932
Psychol Bull. 2007 Jan;133(1):65-94
pubmed: 17201571
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 05;9:1087
pubmed: 30026712
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 23;9(3):
pubmed: 32210017
Behav Ther. 2018 Mar;49(2):180-197
pubmed: 29530258
J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 15;265:395-401
pubmed: 32090765
Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;44(6):480-90
pubmed: 26178164
Iran J Public Health. 2020 Sep;49(9):1692-1700
pubmed: 33643944
J Am Coll Health. 2019 May-Jun;67(4):374-382
pubmed: 29979942
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Sep;47(5):559-572
pubmed: 30871650
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 15;17(14):
pubmed: 32679730
Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;44(3):223-36
pubmed: 25705924
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 23;12:620564
pubmed: 33708161
Internet Interv. 2017 Jul 06;12:83-90
pubmed: 30135772
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;25(11):1127-33
pubmed: 20029795