The "pervasive" state: entrepreneurial identities, frustration, and gratitude.
Affect
COVID-19 pandemic
Legacy of post-socialist transition
Micro-business owners
State practices
Journal
Dialectical anthropology
ISSN: 0304-4092
Titre abrégé: Dialect Anthropol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101093457
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Feb 2023
02 Feb 2023
Historique:
entrez:
7
2
2023
pubmed:
8
2
2023
medline:
8
2
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The state has taken center stage during the COVID-19 pandemic in unanticipated ways. Rescuing private companies with public money exemplifies this, highlighting substantial state interventionism amidst a fairly dominant discourse of our times: that of the "neoliberal state." In this article, we focus on how owners of micro-businesses in Croatia constructed state practices during the COVID-19 pandemic and how interactions with the state prior to the pandemic contributed to these constructions. We reflect on the state as a historically embedded social relation that is understood, experienced, and felt. Drawing on interviews, we develop three themes that illustrate the layered and wrought relationship between business owners and the state, as they understand it to "exist"-state-mediated constructions of business owners: tycoons and heroes; frustrating state practices; contradictory images-the benevolent state. The pervasiveness of the state is reflected in how the post-socialist state has shaped professional identities in the business sector, in the overwhelmingly negative emotional landscape state practices seem to propel, but also in hints of state benevolence during the COVID-19 pandemic. The identified nexus of emotions in relation to state practices-exasperation, disappointment, indignation, gratitude-and their historical embeddedness are a strong indication of how present-day constructions of the state are an expression of "accumulated history." Based on their experiences with state practices, our interlocutors construct the state as corrupt, incompetent, inefficient, uncaring, coercive, only on occasion benevolent, and in a highly affective register as "unnecessary," while also expressing a desire for a state that "cares," particularly in disaster settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36747904
doi: 10.1007/s10624-023-09684-x
pii: 9684
pmc: PMC9891884
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1-15Informations de copyright
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Références
Swiss J Econ Stat. 2020;156(1):15
pubmed: 33078128