Improvement After Surgery in a Patient With Prolonged Tetraplegia Due to Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Without Bone Injury.

cervical decompressive surgery cervical spinal cord injury cervical spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormalities conservative treatment neuro-rehabilitation operative indication

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Historique:
accepted: 05 01 2023
entrez: 8 2 2023
pubmed: 9 2 2023
medline: 9 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Treatment strategies for patients with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without major bone injury in the acute phase are under debate. For CSCI without major bone injury, conservative treatment is often the first choice owing to the absence of fractures and spinal column instability. However, treatment of CSCI without major bone injury by either surgery or conservative measures remains controversial. We described a case of a 48-year-old man with cervical American Spinal Cord Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade C tetraplegia as a result of a fall. Computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging revealed no fractures and widespread T2-hyperintense signal changes in the cord centered on C3-4. The paralyzed condition of his lower extremities remained unchanged with conservative treatment for eight months after the injury. Therefore, he underwent decompression surgery eight months after the injury. At two weeks postoperatively, he could transfer and walk using a walker. After discharge, he underwent regular home-visit rehabilitation and gradually improved his physical functions, including gait ability one year postoperatively. We encountered a case in which surgery and intensive rehabilitation eight months after the injury improved motor function. The combination of surgery in the chronic phase and postoperative rehabilitation can therefore improve the outcomes. The message in this paper is by no means a recommendation for "late surgery." However, we suggested that surgical treatment might be an option if the functional improvement is poor, as even quite late surgery can provide functional improvement.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36751226
doi: 10.7759/cureus.33420
pmc: PMC9899152
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

e33420

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023, Kitade et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Dec 1;37(25):E1560-6
pubmed: 22972511
Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(3 Suppl):195S-202S
pubmed: 29164024
J Orthop Sci. 2019 Mar;24(2):230-236
pubmed: 30361169
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2133604
pubmed: 34751757
World Neurosurg. 2017 Sep;105:790-795
pubmed: 28645598
J Clin Neurosci. 2005 May;12(4):438-43
pubmed: 15925777
Spinal Cord. 2010 Jul;48(7):548-53
pubmed: 20065985
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Feb;133(2):193-8
pubmed: 23179476
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32037
pubmed: 22384132

Auteurs

Ippei Kitade (I)

Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Fukui Hospital, Fukui, JPN.

Hideaki Nakajima (H)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Fukui, Fukui, JPN.

Hiroki Nakagawa (H)

Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, JPN.

Ai Takahashi (A)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Fukui, Fukui, JPN.

Akihiko Matsumine (A)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Fukui, Fukui, JPN.

Classifications MeSH