Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer.
lymphopenia
metastatic cervical cancer
phase I trial prognosis
recurrent cervical cancer
Journal
Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology
ISSN: 2590-017X
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Precis Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101768397
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
17
08
2022
revised:
04
11
2022
accepted:
21
11
2022
entrez:
8
2
2023
pubmed:
9
2
2023
medline:
9
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We aimed to identify clinical, pathologic, and treatment factors that are predictive of response and survival in patients with cervical cancer referred to phase I clinical trials. Patients with cervical cancer who received at least one dose of a phase I investigational agent at our institution between 2014 and 2022 were included. The log-rank test was used to analyze differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and multivariable regression analysis was performed. We included 65 patients with a median age of 41 years (range, 20-74), 3 prior therapies (range, 1-7), and 67.7% squamous carcinoma. The rate of distant metastasis at trial entry was 84.6%. The most common molecular alterations included PIK3CA (46.5%), PD-L1+ (46.2%), EPH (30.0%), and CREBBP (23.1%); 23.1% had received a prior checkpoint inhibitor. Phase I trials were for immunotherapy (58.5%) or targeted therapy (41.5%). The rate of biomarker matching was 21.5%. For all patients, median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.0-5.2) and OS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.0-10.6). Factors at study entry associated with worse survival were presence of bone metastasis (PFS 1.6 vs 4.4 months: hazard ratio [HR], 2.8; Bone metastasis and absolute lymphocyte count below normal range at phase I study entry portend poor survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36751659
doi: 10.36401/JIPO-22-23
pmc: PMC9888522
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
10-18Informations de copyright
© 2023.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest directly relating to this study. Unelated conflicts of interest are listed in Supplemental Material (available online).
Références
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 May 29;106(6):dju124
pubmed: 24875653
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Oct 1;112(10):1021-1029
pubmed: 31922567
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008 Jun;132(6):931-9
pubmed: 18517275
Lancet. 2003 Jun 28;361(9376):2217-25
pubmed: 12842378
Anticancer Res. 2012 Apr;32(4):1555-61
pubmed: 22493401
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33
pubmed: 35020204
Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Jun;77(3):446-9
pubmed: 10831357
Am J Clin Oncol. 1996 Oct;19(5):439-41
pubmed: 8823469
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):734-43
pubmed: 24552320
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 1;38(1):1-10
pubmed: 31682550
N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 10;386(6):544-555
pubmed: 35139273
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 May 01;145(5):413-421
pubmed: 30920592
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Jan;96(1):103-7
pubmed: 15589587
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun 10;37(17):1470-1478
pubmed: 30943124
Am J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug;30(4):428-31
pubmed: 17762444
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Sep;24(7):1319-25
pubmed: 25033256
Clin Chim Acta. 2018 Aug;483:296-302
pubmed: 29758203
Lancet Oncol. 2021 May;22(5):609-619
pubmed: 33845034
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Jan;116(1):44-9
pubmed: 19853287
JAMA. 2004 Nov 3;292(17):2130-40
pubmed: 15523074
Br J Cancer. 2018 Mar 20;118(6):763-769
pubmed: 29462132
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 11;385(20):1856-1867
pubmed: 34534429
Circulation. 2018 Aug 14;138(7):743-745
pubmed: 30359135
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 May 15;18(10):2922-9
pubmed: 22452943
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Jul;110(1):65-70
pubmed: 18455781
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Feb;92(2):639-43
pubmed: 14766259
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(32):e4381
pubmed: 27512849
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Apr;20(3):373-8
pubmed: 20375800
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Sep;23(7):1311-7
pubmed: 23839246
Br J Cancer. 2008 Mar 25;98(6):1029-33
pubmed: 18349817