The Safety and Efficacy of Salvage Stereotactic Radiation Therapy in Patients with Intraprostatic Tumor Recurrence After Previous External Radiation Therapy: Phase 1 Results from the GETUG-AFU 31 Study.

Local recurrence Phase 1 Prostate cancer Radiation therapy Reirradiation Salvage stereotactic body radiation therapy Stereotactic body radiation therapy

Journal

European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2023
Historique:
received: 19 08 2022
revised: 11 12 2022
accepted: 12 01 2023
medline: 31 7 2023
pubmed: 9 2 2023
entrez: 8 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is no consensus on the best local salvage treatment for prostate cancer recurrence after primary external beam radiotherapy. Prospective data on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are very scarce. To determine the optimal dose regimen for salvage SBRT. The present report concerns the phase 1 part of the GETUG-AFU 31 multicenter open-label study. The main inclusion criteria were histologically proven biochemical recurrence, clinical stage T1-T2 upon relapse, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging data, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≤10 ng/ml prior to salvage SBRT, PSA doubling time >10 mo, and an International Prostate Symptom Score of ≤12. Five or six fractions of 6 Gy were delivered using focal SBRT. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade ≥3 gastrointestinal or genitourinary tract toxicity, or any grade 4 toxicity (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03) occurring in the first 18 wk following treatment initiation. A time-to-event continual reassessment method was used to select the dose regimen. Twenty-one patients were treated (median [interquartile range] age: 76.8 yr [72.2-80.8]), including 12 at 6 × 6 dose level. No DLT was observed. The acute grade 2 genitourinary tract toxicity rate was 19%. With a median follow-up of 12.3 mo, the estimated cumulative incidence of late grade 2 genitourinary toxicity was 41.2% (95% confidence interval: 18.1-63.1%). No grade >2 genitourinary toxicity and no grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity were reported. All treated patients were alive and relapse free at the last follow-up. A 6 × 6 Gy dose regimen was selected for our phase 2 study of salvage SBRT. With a short follow-up period, the level of toxicity appears to be acceptable. There is no consensus on the best local treatment for patients with local relapse after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Prospective data are very scarce. Our early phase trial allowed us to recommend six fractions of 6 Gy using high-precision radiotherapy for further studies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
There is no consensus on the best local salvage treatment for prostate cancer recurrence after primary external beam radiotherapy. Prospective data on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are very scarce.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the optimal dose regimen for salvage SBRT.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
The present report concerns the phase 1 part of the GETUG-AFU 31 multicenter open-label study. The main inclusion criteria were histologically proven biochemical recurrence, clinical stage T1-T2 upon relapse, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging data, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≤10 ng/ml prior to salvage SBRT, PSA doubling time >10 mo, and an International Prostate Symptom Score of ≤12.
INTERVENTION
Five or six fractions of 6 Gy were delivered using focal SBRT.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade ≥3 gastrointestinal or genitourinary tract toxicity, or any grade 4 toxicity (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03) occurring in the first 18 wk following treatment initiation. A time-to-event continual reassessment method was used to select the dose regimen.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
Twenty-one patients were treated (median [interquartile range] age: 76.8 yr [72.2-80.8]), including 12 at 6 × 6 dose level. No DLT was observed. The acute grade 2 genitourinary tract toxicity rate was 19%. With a median follow-up of 12.3 mo, the estimated cumulative incidence of late grade 2 genitourinary toxicity was 41.2% (95% confidence interval: 18.1-63.1%). No grade >2 genitourinary toxicity and no grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity were reported. All treated patients were alive and relapse free at the last follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
A 6 × 6 Gy dose regimen was selected for our phase 2 study of salvage SBRT. With a short follow-up period, the level of toxicity appears to be acceptable.
PATIENT SUMMARY
There is no consensus on the best local treatment for patients with local relapse after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Prospective data are very scarce. Our early phase trial allowed us to recommend six fractions of 6 Gy using high-precision radiotherapy for further studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36754722
pii: S2588-9311(23)00027-5
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.01.009
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Types de publication

Multicenter Study Clinical Trial, Phase I Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

399-405

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

David Pasquier (D)

Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Lille, France. Electronic address: d-pasquier@o-lambret.fr.

Thomas Lacornerie (T)

Département de Physique Médicale, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.

Stéphane Supiot (S)

Département de Radiothérapie, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-Site René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France.

Pascal Pommier (P)

Département de Radiothérapie, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Magali Quivrin (M)

Département de Radiothérapie, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.

Jean-Marc Simon (JM)

Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.

Geneviève Loos (G)

Département de Radiothérapie, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Emmanuel Meyer (E)

Département de Radiothérapie, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.

Gilles Calais (G)

Département d'Oncologie et de Radiothérapie, CHRU Tours, France.

Didier Peiffert (D)

Département de Radiothérapie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Benjamin Vandendorpe (B)

Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.

Estelle Aymes (E)

Département de Biostatistiques, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.

Clémence Leguillette (C)

Département de Biostatistiques, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.

Meryem Brihoum (M)

Unicancer, Recherche et Développement, Paris, France.

Soazig Nenan (S)

Unicancer, Recherche et Développement, Paris, France.

Luc Cormier (L)

Service d'urologie, CHU Besançon, France.

Marie-Cécile Le Deley (MC)

Département de Biostatistiques, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.

Eric F Lartigau (EF)

Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Lille, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH